Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention, 1977 (No. 148) - Hungary (Ratification: 1994)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2025, published 114th ILC session (2026)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on occupational safety and health (OSH), the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 127 (maximum weight), 139 (occupational cancer), 148 (working environment (air pollution, noise and vibration)), 155 (OSH), 161 (occupational health services), and 167 (safety and health in construction) together.

The Committee notes the observations of the Forum for the Co-operation of Trade Unions (SZEF) and the Hungarian Trade Union Confederation (MASZSZ), received in 2024. It also notes the observations made by the workers’ representatives of the National ILO Council communicated with the Government’s reports concerning Conventions Nos 155 and 167.

General Provisions

Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)

The Committees notes the information provided by the Government on the implementing measures giving effect to Article 11(b) (on determination of work processes, substances and agents subject to authorization or control), Article 11(f) (systems to examine chemical, physical and biological agents in respect of the risk to the health of workers) and Article 16 of the Convention (employers’ responsibilities) which responds to its previous request.

Articles 4, 7 and 8 of Convention No. 155. National OSH policy and review of the national OSH situation. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indications in its report regarding the adoption of the national OSH policy for the period 2016–22, in consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers. It also notes with interest the information provided by the Government on the subsequent discussion and adoption of the national OSH policy for the period 2024–27 within the National Commission for Occupational Safety and Health, which aims to improve the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases and the preparedness for possible future health emergencies. To achieve these objectives, measures will be adopted at the national, sectoral and workplace levels, including for the identification, prevention and reduction of ergonomic and psychosocial risks, and the promotion of safe and healthy working conditions, particularly in the agriculture sector and in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, among others.

The Committee further notes that, in their observations, the workers’ representatives of the National ILO Council claim that the OSH management system currently places little emphasis on prevention and add that there is a persistent lack of OSH prevention in the public sector and in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to ensure the implementation of the national OSH policy 2024–2027, in consultation with the representative organizations of employers and workers concerned, including the measures taken to prevent occupational accidents and diseases in the public and private sectors, including in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the review of the national OSH policy, including information on any discussions regarding OSH held at the National Commission for Occupational Safety and Health, the main problems identified, the methods for addressing them and the priorities for action established.

Articles 5(c), 14 and 19(d). Appropriate training in occupational safety and health. The Committee notes that in their observations, the SZEF and the MASZSZ claim that under section 55(2a) of the OSH Act, in the case of the types of work defined in the Minister’s regulations, the training required when an employee is hired, and when the workplace, job position or requirements for safe and healthy work change, may also be provided by giving the employee the general training material specified in the Minister’s decree or by publishing the training content on an internal electronic network accessible to the employee. The workers’ organizations indicate that, according to Decree No. 6 of 2024, employers are authorized to apply the provision of section 55(2a) of the OSH Act with respect to office workers and teleworkers using information technology and computer equipment. They claim that, although the exception has so far been limited to these two categories of workers, the Minister can extend the personal scope of this provision to other categories of workers by adopting new decrees. The SZEF and the MASZSZ claim that the fact that employers can fulfil their legal obligation by giving the employee the general training or by publishing the content to the internal electronic network undermines the adequacy and suitability of the training provided to workers. The workers’ organizations state that office workers and teleworkers are highly exposed to ergonomic and psychosocial risks. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this respect.

Article 12. Responsibilities of those who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment and substances for occupational use. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that Act XXV of 2000 on Chemical Safety, which aims to identify, prevent, reduce, eliminate and disclose the harmful effects of dangerous substances and mixtures, contains detailed provisions on the manufacture, import and supply of dangerous substances (sections 14, 20(1), 21(4), 30 and 31), as well as on the provision of information and instructions on their correct installation and use (sections 6, 8, 10 and 20(5)). It also notes that Decree No. 16 of 2008 on safety requirements and certification of conformity of machinery establishes requirements for the design of machinery in relation to ergonomics, lighting, protective devices, emergency stops, noise, vibration, radiation and emissions of hazardous substances (Annex 1), as well as the obligation of the manufacturer to draw up instructions for the correct assembly, installation and use of machinery (sections 112(a), 137, 174 and 17.42(k)), and to carry out studies on machinery to determine whether the design and construction are safe (section 1 of Annex 8). The Committee further notes that Decree No. 10 of 2016 on minimum health and safety requirements for work equipment and its use establishes OSH standards for the design of work equipment (sections 4, 33(1), (2) and (4) and 36(1)), and the obligation to install, use and dismantle work equipment in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (sections 29(2), 37(1), 52(3)(a)). Noting the Government’s indications that the development of OSH legislation will continue to be carried out on a tripartite basis, taking into account the opinion of professional organizations such as the National Association of Lifting Machinery, the National Trade Association of Construction Contractors and the Hungarian Chemical Industry Association, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that those who design, manufacture, import, supply or transfer equipment and substances for occupational use undertake studies and research or otherwise keep abreast of the scientific and technical knowledge necessary to comply with Article 12(a) and (b) of the Convention, including the adoption of legislation in this regard in consultation with the representative organizations of employers and workers concerned.

Article 9. Enforcement of laws and regulations concerning OSH through an adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes the observations made by the workers’ representatives of the National ILO Council stating that: (i) the downsizing of the occupational safety and health authority makes it inadequate to fulfil its purpose; and (ii) the number of OSH inspections is decreasing. It also notes the information provided by the Government on the labour inspection services carried out from 2015 to 2023, including the number of inspection visits carried out, the annual inspections made by subject area, the number of OSH irregularities detected, the number of occupational accidents registered (683 fatal accidents, 1,521 serious accidents and 1,996 severe injuries), and the number of occupational diseases and cases of increased exposure notified (15,803 cases).

The Committee further notes the Governments’ indication that the national OSH policy 2024–27 aims to strengthen the operational capacity of the occupational safety and health authority. With reference to its comments under the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), the Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken in practice to strengthen its labour inspection system and to enforce the laws and regulations concerning occupational safety and health and the working environment. In this respect, it also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number, nature and causes of the occupational accidents and diseases notified, as well as information on the inspection activities carried out.

Occupational Health Services Convention, 1985 (No. 161)

Article 5(f) of Convention No. 161. Surveillance of workers’ health in relation to work. The Committee notes that in their joint observations, the SZEF and the MASZSZ claim that: (i) under section 49(1a) of the OSH Act, which entered into force in September 2024, the suitability and health of the employee required for a job should be decided on the basis of a medical examination only in the cases provided for by law or at the employer’s discretion; and (ii) according to section 51(4) of the Labour Code, employers are only required to provide free regular medical examinations when provided by law.

The Committee notes that, in accordance with Decree No. 49 of 2024 on the organization of the compulsory aptitude test for work, fitness for work shall be decided on the basis of medical examinations and opinions in cases where workers are exposed to the following risks: hazardous chemicals, ionizing radiations, handling of loads of more than 10 kilograms, biological agents, dust, noise, vibrations, machinery, work in mines, work with risk of explosion, work with oil and gas, night shift work, work involving heat or cold stress and work at heights.

The Committee notes that the SZEF and the MASZSZ indicate that, according to the joint opinion of the workers’ and employers’ representatives of the national OSH Committee, the system of medical examinations instituted under section 49(1a) of the OSH Act, section 51(4) of the Labour Code and Decree No. 49 of 2024: (i) leads to the exclusion of vulnerable groups of workers from the provision of medical examinations, including pregnant women, young workers and older workers; (ii) does not take into account ergonomic and psychosocial risks; and (iii) does not specify whether it applies to pre-employment examinations as well as periodic examinations. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this respect. It requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to progressively develop health surveillance in relation to work, including for workers exposed to ergonomic and psychosocial risks. It also requests the Government to provide information on the number of medical examinations carried out prior to employment and at regular intervals thereafter.

Articles 8, 9 and 16. Supervision of the operation of occupational health services. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that, by virtue of section 4 of Decree No. 27 of 1995 on occupational health services, these services perform multidisciplinary functions that include (i) identifying sources of risk in the working environment; (ii) providing occupational health services in physiology, psychology, rehabilitation, ergonomics, hygiene, chemical safety and first aid; (iii) reporting on health and safety issues related to working conditions; (iv) advising on personal protective equipment; and (v) reporting and investigating occupational diseases and cases of increased exposure. The Government adds that in order to fulfil these tasks, in the period 2018–2023, 330 graduates, together with specialists and nurses, participated in the implementation of multidisciplinary occupational health services.

With regard to the supervision of their operation, the Government indicates that occupational health is monitored by the Department of Occupational Safety and Health and the National Centre for Public Health and Pharmacy, and that occupational health services report annually on their work. In this respect, the Committee notes that in 2023, the occupational health services conducted 466,702 on-site occupational health inspections, recorded 3,337,120 workers exposed to pathological factors, examined 46,138 cases related to working conditions, treated 366,615 workers with chronic illnesses, organized 4,952 health promotion activities, and carried out 304,258 consultations on occupational health matters. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that the employer, the workers and their representatives participate on an equal footing in the organization of measures related to occupational health, including the selection and evaluation of the occupational health services and the investigation of the circumstances of occupational diseases and incidents of increased exposure. The Committee takes note of this information, which responds to its previous request.

Protection against specific risks

Maximum Weight Convention, 1967 (No. 127)

Article 5 of Convention No. 127. Adequate training on working techniques for the manual transport of loads. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that, under section 55(1) of the OSH Act, employees must receive OSH training, including the necessary information, rules and instructions, before starting work, when the requirements for safe and healthy work change, when the workplace or job changes and when work equipment is adapted. It also notes that the Government indicates that: (i) during official inspections, the occupational safety and health authority verifies that employees receive information before the manual transport of loads, checking in particular whether they are informed of the risks associated with the manual transport of loads, as well as the relevant rules to avoid such risks; and (ii) in the larger supermarket chains, leaflets with images related to the manual transport of loads and lifting equipment are placed at all work stations, and workers are asked to confirm that they have read them.

The Government also indicates that in workplaces where it is necessary for employees to transport loads manually (due to structural characteristics limiting the use of lifting equipment) OSH training on correct manual transportation is especially important. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to ensure, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention, that workers assigned to the manual transport of loads receive, prior to such assignment, adequate training or instructions on working techniques, with a view to safeguarding health and preventing accidents.

Application in practice. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government on: (i) the supervision of compliance with the provisions on manual transport of loads during every annual inspection; (ii) the number of official measures taken with respect to violations of manual transport of loads rules from 2018 to 2023, which show a steady decrease per year (98 measures in 2018, 63 in 2019, 40 in 2020, 36 in 2021, 34 in 2022, and 16 in 2023); and (iii) the awareness-raising campaigns on safe manual transport of loads carried out between 2020 and 2022, during which informative material and lectures were given to occupational safety specialists, employers and employees. It also notes the Governments’ indication that disorders of the skeletal and muscular system are the most common among workers in the commerce, goods transportation, construction and health sectors. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number of inspections carried out in relation to manual transport of loads and the infringements detected, the number of official preventive measures applied, the number of disorders of the skeletal and muscular system diagnosed and the number of sanctions imposed.

Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139)

Legislation. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the adoption of Decree No. 55 of 2023, which the Government indicates implements the EU Regulation No. 1907 of 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Annex XVII of which contains a list of carcinogens subject to prohibition, authorization and control, which is periodically reviewed and updated. The Government indicates in this respect that Decree No. 55 gives effect to a number of provisions of the Convention, namely: Article 2(2) on the reduction of the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances and the duration and degree of such exposure to the minimum compatible with safety (sections 5(5), 6(1), 7(3)); Article 3 on measures to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances, including a system of records (sections 5(8) and(12) and 17 and 15(6)); and Article 4 on the obligation to inform workers of the risks that carcinogenic substances pose to their health and the measures that should be taken (sections 12 and 13(2)). The Committee requests that the Government take into account its comments below concerning Article 5 of the Convention.

Article 2(1) of Convention No. 139. Replacing carcinogenic substances with non-carcinogenic substances or less harmful substances. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that: (i) under section 54(1)(f) of the OSH Act, employers are required to replace hazardous working conditions with safe or less hazardous working conditions to ensure safe and healthy work; and (ii) by virtue of section 5(13) and (14) of Decree No. 55 of 2023, the use of carcinogenic substances may only be introduced if it is technically impossible to substitute them with non-carcinogenic substances or with less harmful substances. If a non-carcinogenic or less dangerous substance is available, the employer must explain why the carcinogenic substance is not being replaced.

It also notes that the Government indicates that the occupational safety and health authority draws the employers’ attention to the need to substitute carcinogenic substances with non-carcinogenic or less potent substances, where possible. It indicates that during inspections, the authority has noted that employers are prioritizing the substitution of carcinogenic substances with a view to complying with the requirements of Decree No. 55 of 2023. The Government adds that, in practice, the difficulties regarding the substitution of carcinogenic substances with non-carcinogenic ones is mainly due to economic limitations as well as a lack of knowledge or technological specificities. Noting the challenges identified by the Government, the Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken to support employers in overcoming these difficulties, with a view to ensuring that, in practice, carcinogenic substances and agents are replaced by non-carcinogenic substances or agents or by less harmful substances or agents.

Article 5. Medical examinations after the period of employment. The Committee notes that section 15(1) of Decree No. 55 of 2023 provides for medical examinations prior to the commencement of employment involving exposure to carcinogenic substances, as well as periodic examinations during the period of employment. It notes, however, that according to section 15(3) of the aforementioned Decree, the health of the worker is monitored after the end of exposure to carcinogenic substances at the initiative of the doctor or the occupational safety and health authority. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the implementation of section 15(3) with a view to ensuring that workers are provided with such medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations, as are necessary to evaluate their state of health in relation to occupational hazards after their employment.

Article 6(b) and (c). Appropriate inspections services. Application in practice. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that (i) the bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the Convention are the occupational safety and health authority (section 86(1)(b) of the OSH Act) and the State Health Administration Body (section 4(3) of Act XI of 1991 on Health Authorities and Administration); and (ii) the OSH Act establishes the procedure in case of violation of the rules relating to the application of the Convention, including the powers of labour inspectors to order remedial measures, prohibition measures and measures of immediate executory force, in case of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents (section 84(1)), and the imposition of penalties for violation of OSH requirements (section 82(1)).

Furthermore, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the application in practice of the Convention from 2016 to 2023, including the number of inspections carried out (1,065), the number of cases of increased exposure to lead and its inorganic compounds (122), the number of workers affected by asbestos demolition activities (10,249), the number of remedial and suspension orders issued (2,251), the number and amounts of fines imposed (62 fines, amounting to 65,346,651 Hungarian forints), and the number of cases of occupational cancer reported (25). The Government indicates that the lack of knowledge on the part of employers of the carcinogenic properties of the substances and agents gives rise to various infringements, such as: lack of risk assessments, lack of information provided to workers on the carcinogenic risks involved and the measures to be taken, lack of ventilation and decontamination of the working environment, poor occupational hygiene, lack of surveillance of workers’ health through medical examinations and lack of adequate records. The Government adds that, according to the occupational hygiene and occupational health body, deaths caused by occupational cancer represent approximately 10 per cent of all cases of fatal cancers in the country. Noting the Government’s indications that it plans to report activities involving carcinogenic substances on the official website of the Minister of Employment and Social Affairs and increase inspections of workplaces where activities involving exposure to these substances and agents are carried out,the Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures adopted to strengthen compliance with the provisions of the Convention, as well as information on its practical application, including the number of inspections and investigations carried out, the number of violations detected and sanctions imposed, as well as the number of occupational diseases and cases of increased exposure to carcinogens reported.

Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention, 1977 (No. 148)

Articles 4 and 12 of Convention No. 148. Prevention, control of and protection against occupational hazards in the working environment concerning air pollution, noise and vibration. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that (i) the Department of Occupational Health and Safety produced a guide describing the risk assessment process, including the assessments relating to noise and vibration; and (ii) the Department is preparing information material on all issues related to exposure for both employers and workers to reinforce the preventive approach.

It also notes that the Government refers to the employer’s obligations to adopt preventive measures as set out in Decree No. 66 of 2005 on the minimum safety and health requirements for the exposure of workers to noise, including sections 3, 4, 8(1) and (2) and 12(a) and (b). The Government also refers to the employer’s obligations established in sections 3, 5 and 6 of Decree No. 22 of 2005 on the minimum health and safety requirements for the exposure of workers to vibration.

The Committee also notes the Government’s indication regarding the adoption of Decree No. 5 of 2020 on the protection of the safety and health of workers exposed to chemical agents, which establishes the employer’s obligation to adopt preventive measures, including carrying out risk assessments of chemical agents (section 5) and managing hazardous substances (sections 6–8), among others. The Committee notes, in addition, the information provided by the Government on the number of violations of risk assessment rules identified between 2018 and 2023 with regard to noise (767), vibrations (88) and air pollution (897). The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that effective preventive measures are taken in practice for the protection of workers from health risks related to air pollution, noise and vibration, including the measures taken to ensure compliance with the risk assessments rules, established in Decree No. 66 of 2005, Decree No. 22 of 2005 and Decree No. 5 of 2020. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the material prepared by the Department of Occupational Health and Safety to reinforce the preventive approach to the risks generated by occupational exposure to air pollution, noise and vibration.

Protection in specific branches of activity

Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167)

Article 35 of Convention No. 167. Appropriate inspection and effective enforcement of the provisions of the Convention. Application in practice. With regard to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that: (i) several targeted inspections were carried out in the construction sector in 2017, 2020 and 2021; and (ii) by virtue of Decree No. 25 of 2024 on the amount of the occupational safety and health fine and the detailed rules for its imposition, the amounts of fines for OSH violations have been increased.

It also notes that, according to the information provided by the Government on labour inspections carried out between 2016 and 2023: (i) the number of inspections carried out in the construction sector has decreased from 3,859 inspections in 2019 to 2,574 inspections in 2023; (ii) there is a high rate of non-compliance with regulations on risk assessment and management, protection against falls, protection against collapses and entrapments, equipment safety, provision of occupational health services and reporting of occupational accidents and diseases and investigation of their causes; (iii) the number of occupational accidents in the construction sector amounted to 7,554, including 184 fatal accidents, 384 serious accidents and 147 severe injuries; (iv) the number of reported cases of occupational diseases was 8; (v) the number and amount of fines imposed was 2,338 fines, totalling 639,398,475 forints; and (vi) the number of remedial measures ordered amounted to 16,752.

The Committee also notes the observations made by the workers’ representatives of the National ILO Council, underlining that the number of inspections is constantly decreasing, despite the high number of occupational accidents in the construction sector. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to strengthen compliance with the provisions of the Convention, as well as information on its application in practice, including the number of inspections and investigations carried out, the number of violations identified and sanctions imposed, as well as the number of occupational accidents and diseases reported.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on occupational safety and health (OSH), the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 161 (occupational health services), 127 (maximum weight) and 148 (working environment (air pollution, noise and vibration)) together.

Occupational Health Services Convention, 1985 (No. 161)

Articles 8, 9 and 16 of the Convention. Supervision of the operation of occupational health services. The Committee notes the observations made by the workers’ representatives of the Tripartite National ILO Council, included in the Government’s report, according to which cost considerations by employers in the employment of private external occupational health services sometimes have a negative effect on the quality of these services. The workers’ representatives indicate that, in practice, occupational health services: (1) do not always cooperate with workers and their representatives, as provided for by Article 8; and (2) are not always of a multidisciplinary nature as required by Article 9. In this context, the Committee also notes the indications made by the workers’ representatives that there are no data on the operation of occupational health services, and that there are no clear regulations on inspections of the relevant service providers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which it ensures the multidisciplinary character of occupational health services, and to provide further information on the manner in which their operation is supervised by the labour inspection services (including their cooperation with workers and their representatives).

Maximum Weight Convention, 1967 (No. 127)

Article 5 of the Convention. Application in practice and adequate training on working techniques for the manual transport of loads. The Committee notes the observations made by the workers’ representatives of the Tripartite National ILO Council included in the Government’s report, that there are no specific rules guaranteeing the training on the manual handling of goods, and that the Government’s report does not specify to what extent relevant training is provided in practice. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that in 2014, 1,326 targeted inspections were carried out, and provides general information on the results of inspections relating to risk assessments and training, without providing specific data in relation to the manual movement of material. The Committee requests the Government to provide statistical information on the violations detected during inspections concerning the manual transport of loads, as well as the measures taken to ensure that workers assigned to the manual transport of loads receive adequate training with a view to protecting their health and preventing accidents.

Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention, 1977 (No. 148))

Articles 4 and 12 of the Convention. Prevention, control of and protection against occupational hazards in the working environment concerning noise and vibration. The Committee notes the Government’s reiterated indication that there are no notification obligations with respect to risks related to vibration and noise at workplaces. It notes the Government’s indication that the National Health and Medical Office establishes an annual report based on the risks identified by the occupational health services, which also includes information on the number of workers exposed to noise and vibration. It further notes that the Government indicates that a reporting obligation is not necessary, as the thresholds for noise and vibration are verified through labour inspection, and remedial measures ordered, if necessary. In this context, the Committee also notes from the information provided in the Government’s report that noise and vibration are frequent omissions in risk assessments undertaken by employers. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that effective preventive measures are taken in practice for the protection of workers from health risks relating to noise and vibration, including the measures it is taking to ensure that these issues are included in the relevant risk assessments.

Article 11(3). Provision of alternative employment. The Committee notes the Government’s reference in reply to the Committee’s previous request, to the rules on the transfer of workers that have been exposed to air pollution, noise or vibration. The Committee also notes the Government’s indications made in reply to the Committee’s request concerning the maintenance of the income of workers who are required to discontinue work in view of having been exposed to the above risks. In this respect, the Committee refers the Government to its comments under the Workmen’s Compensation (Accidents) Convention, 1925 (No. 17), and the Workmen’s Compensation (Occupational Diseases) Convention (Revised), 1934 (No. 42).

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report, including on the adoption of new laws and regulations, including the amendment to Decree No. 25/2000 (IX.30.) EüM-SzCsM to take into account new limit values related to the exposure to asbestos; Decree No. 66/2005 (XII.22.) EüM SzCsM concerning the exposure to noise and Decree No. 22/2005 (VII.24.) EüM of the Minister of Health regarding exposure to vibration. Based on available information the Committee notes the effect given to Articles 8(1) and (2), and 9 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the referenced legislation was not attached to the report. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on legislative developments in the country and to make the relevant legislative texts available to the Committee.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application and definitions. The Committee notes that the report is silent as to whether the new legislation, adopted by the Minister of Health has amended the scope of national legislation so as to ensure compliance with this provision of the Convention and that only excerpts of the relevant texts have been made available to the Committee. The Committee requests the Government to provide further detailed information regarding the scope of the relevant legislation.

Article 11(3). Provision of alternative employment. The Committee notes that the information provided by the Government does not include a response to the comment raised by the Committee regarding the rules concerning the transfer of workers who have been exposed to air pollution noise or vibration where continued assignment is considered medically inadvisable, and measures taken to ensure that transferred workers are able to maintain their income. In this respect, the Committee would like draw the Government’s attention to the fact that the provision of Article 11(3) also relates to situations before any occupational disease has been declared but after a determination that continued assignment to work involving exposure to air pollution noise and vibration has been found to be medically inadvisable. The Committee again requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken to ensure the transfer to alternative employment of workers who, based on medical opinion, are required to discontinue work involving exposure to air pollution, noise or vibration and how it is ensured that such workers are able to maintain their income.

Article 12. Notification to the competent authority of exposure of workers to occupational hazards. The Committee notes that in its response the Government indicates that, in conformity with harmonized legislation with the European Community, there are no notification obligations with respect to risks related to vibration and noise at workplaces. The Committee also notes that the report is silent as regards the competent authority’s entitlement to authorize or prohibit the use of certain processes, machinery and equipment as provided in Article 12. The Government also indicates that, following consultations in the tripartite National ILO Council on the report for the ILO, the workers’ organizations expressed the view that national law was not in conformity with Article 12 of the Convention. The Committee deems it relevant yet again to refer to paragraph 68 of its general comments on the application of Conventions on occupational safety and health in its 1997 General Report, where the Committee stated that “there is a difference between international standards and regional standards in the approach adopted to occupational safety and health problems and the manner in which they are to be addressed. The incorporation of regional standards into national legislation is not always sufficient to meet the requirements of the international standards of the ILO. States should therefore be reminded that greater attention should be paid to these standards in the revision and formulation of national laws and regulations”. The Committee requests the Government to clarify measures taken to ensure full conformity with this provision of the Convention in law and in practice taking the comments of the workers’ organizations into account.

Part IV of the report form. Application in practice. The Committee notes that the report does not contain any information on the application in practice of the Convention as requested. The Committee requests the Government to provide a general appreciation of the application in practice of the Convention, including, for instance, extracts from the reports of the inspection services.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report, including on the adoption of new laws and regulations. The Committee regrets to note, however, that the Government has not complied with the Committee’s request to submit copies of relevant legislation providing for implementation of the provisions of Article 4 of the Convention. Although the Committee, in a few cases, has been able to find the relevant information in publicly available sources, the Committee is not in a position to fully appreciate the implementation of the provisions of the Convention in the country. The Committee therefore reiterates its request to the Government to submit copies of relevant legislative texts including Act LXXXIII of 1997 (Article 11), Decree No. 58/1997 (XII.21) of the Ministry of Welfare and Decree No. 233/1996 (XII.26), as well as up to date information on relevant technical standards and codes of practice providing for a practical implementation of the Convention (Article 4(2)). The Committee also notes that the report does not contain replies to all questions raised in its previous comments. It requests the Government to provide further information on the following points.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope and definitions. The Committee notes the new legislation adopted by the Minister of Health, namely Decrees Nos. 25/2000 (IX.30) Eüm-SzCsM regarding air pollution, 18/2001 (IV.28) Eüm regarding noise and 3/2002 (II.8) SzCsM-Eüm regarding vibration. The Government has indicated that Decrees Nos 25/2000 and 18/2001 do not cover all sectoral activities. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide further detailed information regarding the scope of application of the relevant legislation and how adequate protection is ensured for workers in the branches excluded from the relevant legislation.

Article 2(2). Effect given to the Convention in law and in practice. The Committee notes that the Government refers to a series of directives from the European Community. Against this background, the Committee deems it relevant to refer to paragraph 68 of its general comments on the application of Conventions on occupational safety and health in its report in 1997, where the Committee stated that “there is a difference between international standards and regional standards in the approach adopted to occupational safety and health problems and the manner in which they are to be addressed. The incorporation of regional standards into national legislation is not always sufficient to meet the requirements of the international standards of the ILO. States should therefore be reminded that greater attention should be paid to these standards in the revision and formulation of national laws and regulations”. Against this background, the Committee invites the Government to give due attention to the obligations it has undertaken through the ratification of the present Convention.

Article 8(1) and (2). Preventive and protective measures. The Committee notes the detailed information regarding the criteria for determining the hazards of exposure to air pollution, noise and vibration, as well as the exposure limits on the basis of these criteria. It also notes the information that this legislation has been discussed and approved by the Work Safety Committee, and that the development of noise level criteria was assisted by the Optics and Acoustics Society (OPAKFI). The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide further information on how the views of technically competent persons designated by the most representative organizations of employers and workers are taken into account in the areas of air pollution and vibration.

Article 9. Technical and organizational measures. The Committee notes the statement by the Government that the requested information is outside the competence of the health sector. The Committee would, however, be grateful if the Government would provide the requested information on particulars of technical or organizational measures prescribed for new plants or processes in design or installation in respect of air pollution or vibration.

Article 11(3). Provision of alternative employment. With reference to Decree No. 22/2005 of the Minister of Health on the minimum health and security standards applicable to workers exposed to vibration, the Committee notes that in case of damage to health due to vibration, the worker must be transferred to an activity where there is no further exposure to vibration. The Committee notes, however, that the report is silent on the question of the transfer of workers exposed to air pollution or noise and also on the question of measures taken to ensure that workers transferred are able to maintain their income. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on how the obligation to provide suitable alternative employment is ensured also for workers required to discontinue work involving exposure to air pollution or noise and, for all three contingencies, how it is ensured that workers required to discontinue work are able to maintain their income.

Article 12. Notification to the competent authority of exposure of workers to occupational hazards. The Committee notes that in its previous reports the Government has referred to several decrees adopted in 1997 and 1999 as being relevant in the context of the application of the present Article. The Committee notes, however, that in its most recent report the Government refers only to the more recent Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30). The Committee also notes that the Government indicates that the reporting obligations regulated in Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30) does not provide for a reporting obligation for work involving exposure to noise and vibration. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would clarify whether Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30) replaces or complements legislation referred to in previous reports, and how full conformity with this provision of the Convention is ensured in law and in practice.

Article 12. Authorizations by the competent authority. Subject to a clarification whether Decree No. 4/1997 of the Ministry of Welfare is still in force, the Committee notes that while this Decree specifies harmful substances and describes the notification process of the use of these substances, there is no mention of a right of a competent authority to authorize or prohibit the use of these substances. The Committee also notes that the report is silent as regards the competent authority’s entitlement to authorize or prohibit the use of certain processes, machinery and equipment as provided in Article 12. The Committee requests the Government to indicate how full effect is given to this Article in law and in practice.

Part IV of the report form. Statistical information. The Committee notes the detailed statistical information provided by the Government concerning preventive inspections carried out. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide such information and complement it with relevant data on related occupational accidents and diseases.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

1. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report, including on the adoption of new laws and regulations. The Committee regrets to note, however, that the Government has not complied with the Committee’s request to submit copies of relevant legislation providing for implementation of the provisions of Article 4 of the Convention. Although the Committee, in a few cases, has been able to find the relevant information in publicly available sources, the Committee is not in a position to fully appreciate the implementation of the provisions of the Convention in the country. The Committee therefore reiterates its request to the Government to submit copies of relevant legislative texts including Act LXXXIII of 1997 (Article 11), Decree No. 58/1997 (XII.21) of the Ministry of Welfare and Decree No. 233/1996 (XII.26), as well as up to date information on relevant technical standards and codes of practice providing for a practical implementation of the Convention (Article 4, paragraph 2). The Committee also notes that the report does not contain replies to all questions raised in its previous comments. It requests the Government to provide further information on the following points.

2. Article 1 of the Convention. Scope and definitions. The Committee notes the new legislation adopted by the Minister of Health, namely Decrees Nos. 25/2000 (IX.30) Eüm-SzCsM regarding air pollution, 18/2001 (IV.28) Eüm regarding noise and 3/2002 (II.8) SzCsM-Eüm regarding vibration. The Government has indicated that Decrees Nos. 25/2000 and 18/2001 do not cover all sectoral activities. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide further detailed information regarding the scope of application of the relevant legislation and how adequate protection is ensured for workers in the branches excluded from the relevant legislation.

3. Article 2, paragraph 2. Effect given to the Convention in law and in practice. The Committee notes that the Government refers to a series of directives from the European Community. Against this background, the Committee deems it relevant to refer to paragraph 68 of its general comments on the application of Conventions on occupational safety and health in its report in 1997, where the Committee stated that “there is a difference between international standards and regional standards in the approach adopted to occupational safety and health problems and the manner in which they are to be addressed. The incorporation of regional standards into national legislation is not always sufficient to meet the requirements of the international standards of the ILO. States should therefore be reminded that greater attention should be paid to these standards in the revision and formulation of national laws and regulations”. Against this background, the Committee invites the Government to give due attention to the obligations it has undertaken through the ratification of the present Convention.

4. Article 8, paragraphs 1 and 2. Preventive and protective measures. The Committee notes the detailed information regarding the criteria for determining the hazards of exposure to air pollution, noise and vibration, as well as the exposure limits on the basis of these criteria. It also notes the information that this legislation has been discussed and approved by the Work Safety Committee, and that the development of noise level criteria was assisted by the Optics and Acoustics Society (OPAKFI). The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide further information on how the views of technically competent persons designated by the most representative organizations of employers and workers are taken into account in the areas of air pollution and vibration.

5. Article 9. Technical and organizational measures. The Committee notes the statement by the Government that the requested information is outside the competence of the health sector. The Committee would, however, be grateful if the Government would provide the requested information on particulars of technical or organizational measures prescribed for new plants or processes in design or installation in respect of air pollution or vibration.

6. Article 11, paragraph 3. Provision of alternative employment. With reference to Decree No. 22/2005 of the Minister of Health on the minimum health and security standards applicable to workers exposed to vibration, the Committee notes that in case of damage to health due to vibration, the worker must be transferred to an activity where there is no further exposure to vibration. The Committee notes, however, that the report is silent on the question of the transfer of workers exposed to air pollution or noise and also on the question of measures taken to ensure that workers transferred are able to maintain their income. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on how the obligation to provide suitable alternative employment is ensured also for workers required to discontinue work involving exposure to air pollution or noise and, for all three contingencies, how it is ensured that workers required to discontinue work are able to maintain their income.

7. Article 12. Notification to the competent authority of exposure of workers to occupational hazards. The Committee notes that in its previous reports the Government has referred to several decrees adopted in 1997 and 1999 as being relevant in the context of the application of the present Article. The Committee notes, however, that in its most recent report the Government refers only to the more recent Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30). The Committee also notes that the Government indicates that the reporting obligations regulated in Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30) does not provide for a reporting obligation for work involving exposure to noise and vibration. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would clarify whether Decree No. 26/2000 (IX.30) replaces or complements legislation referred to in previous reports, and how full conformity with this provision of the Convention is ensured in law and in practice.

8. Article 12. Authorizations by the competent authority. Subject to a clarification whether Decree No. 4/1997 of the Ministry of Welfare is still in force, the Committee notes that while this Decree specifies harmful substances and describes the notification process of the use of these substances, there is no mention of a right of a competent authority to authorize or prohibit the use of these substances. The Committee also notes that the report is silent as regards the competent authority’s entitlement to authorize or prohibit the use of certain processes, machinery and equipment as provided in Article 12. The Committee requests the Government to indicate how full effect is given to this Article in law and in practice.

9. Part IV of the report form. Statistical information. The Committee notes the detailed statistical information provided by the Government concerning preventive inspections carried out. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide such information and complement it with relevant data on related occupational accidents and diseases.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government's report and in particular the adoption of new standards and texts of laws and regulations.

The Committee also notes that the Government's report does not contain replies to its previous comments and the requested texts of Decrees and other standards have not been supplied. It requests the Government to supply these replies and texts as well as others indicated below.

Article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply all the texts of laws and regulations containing measures for the prevention and control of, and protection against, occupational hazards in the working environment due to air pollution, noise and vibration, and in particular the following texts previously requested in 1997:

-- Decree No. 25/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare (also requested 1999 under Convention No. 155);

-- Decree No. 26/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare (also requested in 1999 under Convention No. 155);

-- Decree No. 27/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare (also requested in 1999 under Convention No. 155);

-- Decree No. 4/1981 of the Ministry of Health;

-- Decree No. 6/1982 of the Ministry of Health.

Article 4, paragraph 2. The Government is requested to supply copies of all texts containing provisions concerning the practical implementation of the measures prescribed in national laws and regulations provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, and in particular the following texts:

-- MSZ 18162:83, MSZ-ISO 1999:94, MSZ-ISO 5349:91, MSZ 21461-1:88, MSZ 21461-2:92 (previously requested in 1997);

-- MSZ EN 28041:1998: Reaction of the human body to vibration (ISO 8041:1993), MSZ EN 12001:1998: Noise emission of machinery and equipment (ISO 12001:1996);

-- the joint methodological document of OFOGI and OmüI on damages to hearing (previously requested in 1997);

-- the methodological letter of OmüI (1977) with respect to exposure to vibration (previously requested in 1997).

Article 5, paragraph 2. Please describe the procedure followed for associating representatives of employers and workers in the elaboration of provisions concerning the practical implementation of the measures prescribed in pursuance of the Convention.

Article 8, paragraphs 1 and 2. The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. Please indicate how the opinion of technically competent persons designated by the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned was taken into account in the elaboration of the criteria and the determination of the exposure limits specified for all the hazards. The Government is requested to continue to supply information and relevant texts, and in particular the following texts:

-- Decree No. 58/1997 (XII.21) of the Ministry of Welfare;

-- the draft or the adopted text of the chemical safety Act, currently under preparation and referred to in the Government's latest report;

-- MSZ 21461/1:1998; MSZ 21461/2:1998;

-- MSZ EN 481.

Article 9. The Committee recalls that it had noted from the Government's previous report that in the course of planning of new facilities -- plant or processes -- a chapter on acoustics is to be prepared. The Government is requested to provide particulars of technical or organizational measures prescribed for new plant or processes in design or installation in respect of air pollution or vibration.

Article 11, paragraph 3. The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It notes the information that further measures and regulations are being formulated. Please continue to provide information on developments in this regard as well as supply the texts of measures and regulations adopted. Please provide the texts of Government Decree No. 89/1995, Decree No. 27/1995 (VII.14), Decree No. 44/1995 (XII.7), Act LXXXIII of 1997, Decree No. 217/1997 (XII.1) and its Appendix 1.

Article 12. Please supply the texts of Government Decree No. 233/1996 (XII.26) and Decree No. 4/1997 (II.21) of the Ministry of Welfare (both also requested in 1999 under Convention No. 155), as well as Government Decree No. 134/1997 (IX.3) and Decree No. 31/1997 (X.17) of the Ministry of Welfare.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

The Committee takes note of the information provided in the Government's first report.

The Committee requests the Government to supply additional information on the following points.

Article 2 of the Convention. Please indicate the manner in which the representative organizations of employers and workers concerned were consulted before taking the decision to accept the obligations in respect of all the categories of hazards.

Article 4, paragraph 1. The Government is requested to supply all the texts of laws and regulations containing measures for the prevention and control of, and protection against, occupational hazards in the working environment due to air pollution, noise and vibration, and in particular the following texts:

-- Decree No. 25/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare on the general health requirements of employment and working conditions not endangering health;

-- Decree No. 26/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare specifying measures to limit daily exposure within work processes and activities involving a high degree of risk of health injury;

-- Decree No. 27/1996 of the Ministry of Welfare on the reporting and investigation of occupational diseases and cases of high exposure;

-- Decree No. 4/1981 of the Ministry of Health on the medical examination and assessment of aptitude for a position;

-- Decree No. 6/1982 of the Ministry of Health on the protection of good health of women and the juvenile.

Article 4, paragraph 2. The Government is requested to supply copies of all texts containing provisions concerning the practical implementation of the measures prescribed in national laws and regulations provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, and in particular the following texts:

-- MSZ 18162:83, MSZ-ISO 1999:94, MSZ-ISO 5349:91, MSZ 21461-1:88, MSZ 21461-2:92;

-- the joint methodological document of OFOGI and OMUI on damages to hearing;

-- the methodological letter of OMUI (1977) with respect to exposure to vibration.

Article 5, paragraph 2. Please describe the procedure followed for associating representatives of employers and workers in the elaboration of provisions concerning the practical implementation of the measures prescribed in pursuance of the Convention.

Article 8, paragraphs 1 and 2. The Government is requested to give particulars of the criteria for determining the hazards of exposure to air pollution and the exposure limits specified on the basis of these criteria; please indicate how the opinion of technically competent persons designated by the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned was taken into account in the elaboration of the criteria and the determination of the exposure limits specified for all the hazards.

Article 9. The Committee notes from the Government's report that in the course of planning of new facilities -- plant or processes -- a chapter on acoustics is to be prepared. The Government is requested to provide particulars of technical or organizational measures prescribed for new plant or processes in design or installation in respect of air pollution or vibration.

Article 11, paragraph 3. Please describe the measures taken to provide workers, whose continued assignment to work involving exposure to air pollution, noise or vibration is found to be medically inadvisable, with suitable alternative employment or to maintain their income.