National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
Previous comments: C.167, C.170, C.187
Application of the Convention. New legislation and application in practice. The Committee notes that the Government’s report, received on 1 November 2010, arrived too late to be examined. The Committee notes, however, that both Regulation No. 522-06 and Resolution No. 04-2007 incorporate the Convention in full and that the report reproduces extracts from the legislation that appear to give effect to the provisions of the Convention. So that it can examine the Government’s report more thoroughly, the Committee asks the Government to provide copies of the legislation cited and to reply to the matters raised by the Committee in its previous comments. It also requests the Government to provide detailed information on the application of the Convention in practice.
Application of the Convention. Government’s report and observations from trade unions. The Committee notes the report from the Government which was received too late for the Committee to be able to examine in detail at the current session of the Committee. Nevertheless, the Committee notes the insufficient information provided in relation to its previous comments, and in particular the absence of a reply to questions formulated in paragraphs 2–3 of the comment, which refer to Article 10 on workers’ right and duty to participate in ensuring safe working conditions and Article 12(1) on the right to removal. With reference to the comments from the Autonomous Confederation of Workers’ Unions (CASC), the National Confederation of Trade Union Unity (CNUS) and the National Confederation of Dominican Workers (CNTD), transmitted to the Government on 23 September 2010, the Committee notes that the report received from the Government does not contain a response thereto. The comments from the trade unions refer, inter alia, to the high rate of accidents and diseases in the construction sector, and to the lack of effectiveness of the labour inspectorate in addressing frequent, systematic and serious violations of the applicable legislation. The Committee also notes the reference made to the Ministerial Resolution No. 4 of 2007, but that the Government does not include a copy thereof with its report. It is thus not clear whether this Resolution has an impact on existing legislation and whether this text is the draft legislation on risk prevention, and the amendment to the Occupational Safety and Health in Industry Regulation No. 807 of 30 December 1966, that the Government has referred to in its previous reports. The Committee requests the Government to respond to the comments submitted by the CASC, the CNUS and the CNTD; to provide further details on current legislation giving effect to the Convention, including copies of such legislation; and to reply to its previous comments. The Committee will examine the report of the Government at its next session in the light of any information received in these respects.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2011.]
Legislation. The Committee notes the Government’s first report and notes with interest that, according thereto, before ratification significant progress had been made in adopting legislation to give effect to the Convention. In this context, the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations were adopted by means of Executive Decree No. 522-06 of 7 October 2006. The Government indicates that the entire drafting process for the Regulations was carried out on a tripartite basis in numerous workshops and meetings attended by employers’ and workers’ representatives. The Committee notes that these Regulations appear to pave the way for application of a general occupational safety and health policy and could thus facilitate ratification of the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155), the Protocol of 2002 thereto and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187). Considering the guiding role of the abovementioned instruments as a reference framework for integrating the various components of occupational safety and health, the Committee invites the Government to provide information on any developments in this regard.
The Committee further notes that the Government refers to the recent adoption of the Regulations on risk and safety labelling and information for hazardous materials; the Regulations on the transportation of hazardous substances and materials; and the Regulations on management of hazardous waste. It notes that, according to the Government’s report, the Regulations on classification, labelling, marking and safety data sheets require manufacturers, importers and suppliers of chemical products and substances to label their products, and that the Directorate-General of Health and Safety in Industry (DGHSI) requires labelling in Spanish and also asks for safety data sheets to be submitted. Furthermore, it notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations prohibit the use of any variety of asbestos that involves projection, especially spraying, and any activity that involves the incorporation of low‑density (less than 1 g/cm3) insulation or soundproofing materials that contain asbestos. While welcoming this information, the Committee points out to the Government that the information supplied is not sufficient to allow an assessment of how the Convention is applied in the Dominican Republic. To carry out such an appraisal, the Committee would need detailed information on the provisions of the legislation that give effect to each Article of the Convention. Consequently, the Committee requests the Government to provide a detailed report indicating the legislation and the provisions thereof that give effect to each Article of the Convention in law.
Part V of the report form. Application in practice. The Committee notes the practical information sent by the Government, and in particular that the DGHSI has carried out 92 assessments of different enterprises, 43 of which belong to the chemical industry. It also notes that the DGHSI plans to draw up a profile of the enterprises that use hazardous chemicals; and to register, analyse and evaluate occupational diseases by chemical product; reactivate the inter‑institutional committee to monitor compliance with the Convention; and to join the Latin America and the Caribbean mechanisms in the interests of a strategic approach to the management of chemicals at international level. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on developments in these tasks performed by the DGHSI and to continue to provide the information requested in this part of the report form.
1. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes with interest the information on the application of Article 1, paragraph 2 (applicability of the Convention to machinery operated by manual power), and Article 16 (consultation of the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned during the formulation of the relevant national legislation) of the Convention.
2. Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4. Dangerous parts of machinery requiring guards. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report to the effect that all the elements set out in this Article, as well as the parts and machinery referred to, are included in the amendment to Regulation No. 807, which has been submitted to the National Congress for examination by the legislators. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether the amendment of Regulation No. 807 has already been adopted by the National Congress, based on the proposal presented by the Presidential Council, or if this amendment has been adopted by the Presidential Council and has been transmitted to the National Congress for information only. It asks the Government to provide a copy of the amended Regulation No. 807.
3. Article 4. Manufacturers and vendors upon whom the obligation to ensure compliance with the provisions of Article 2 shall rest. The Government indicates in its report that the new Regulations contain an appropriate provision. The Committee trusts that an amendment will be introduced into the above text and requests the Government to provide a copy of it after its enactment.
4. Article 15, paragraph 1. The necessary measures to ensure the effective enforcement of the provisions of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication concerning penalties and fines, as means of imposing sanctions, calculated in terms of minimum wages, and it requests the Government to indicate the provisions adopted in this respect.
1. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s reports. It also notes that the Government is currently working on a draft legislation on risk prevention and on an amendment to the Occupational Safety and Health in Industry Regulation No. 807 of 30 December 1966 and hopes that this legislation, once adopted, will give due effect to the relevant provisions of the Convention, including Article 5. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in this regard.
2. Article 10. Workers’ right and duty to participate in ensuring safe working conditions. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that workers’ rights to participate in ensuring safe working conditions is regulated in section 68 of the Occupational Safety and Health in Industry Regulation No. 807 of 1966, providing cooperation between employers and workers through the establishment of safety and health committees. However, the Committee notes that there appears to be no provision in national legislation ensuring workers right and duty to participate in ensuring safe working conditions to the extent of their control over the equipment and methods of work and to express views on the working procedures adopted as they may affect safety and health. Therefore, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures envisaged or adopted to ensure the full application of this Article of the Convention.
3. Article 12, paragraph 1. Right to removal. The Committee notes that section 139 of the Occupational Safety and Health in Industry Regulation No. 807 of 1966 provides for the duty of workers to inform their supervisor immediately when they have good reason to believe that there is an imminent and serious danger to their safety or health and for the duty of employers to take immediate steps to stop the operation and forbid entrance to the industrial site. However, the Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health in Industry Regulation does not provide that a worker shall have the right to remove themselves from danger when they have good reason to believe that there is an imminent and serious danger to their safety or health. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary steps to ensure workers’ right to remove themselves when they believe there is an imminent and serious danger to safety and health.
4. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application of the following points:
– Articles 1 and 7. Application of the Convention to self-employed workers;
– Article 8. Coordination of safety and health measures when two or more employers undertake activities simultaneously at one construction site;
– Article 13. Appropriate precautions to protect persons at or in the vicinity of a construction site from all risks that may arise from such site;
– Articles 14 and 15. Inspection of scaffolds, lifting appliances and gear in accordance with the Convention;
– Articles 16. Transport, earth-moving and materials-handling equipment;
– Articles 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24. Cofferdams and caissons; work in compressed air; structural frames and formwork; work over water and demolition work;
– Article 27. Protection of workers and other persons against risk of injury;
– Article 29. Fire precautions; and
– Article 31. Removal for medical attention of workers who have suffered an accident or sudden illness.
5. Part VI of the report form. The Committee notes that the Directorate General for Industrial Occupational Safety and Health of the State Secretariat of Labour is the competent authority in charge of inspections. The Committee notes that, in its latest report of 2005, the Government indicates that 71 infringements to occupational safety and health measures were verified representing 6 per cent of the total infringements. The Committee notes with satisfaction a decreasing trend in the number of infringements to occupational safety and health measures verified since 1999. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the number of accidents and diseases reported in the construction sector. It also requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to prevent accidents in the construction sector, especially those caused by falls from heights. The Government is also asked to continue to provide detailed information on labour inspection and a general appreciation of the application of the Convention.
1. The Committee notes the information in the Government’s report and the indication that no women are working in mines.
2. The Committee takes the opportunity to recall that, based on the conclusions and proposals of the Working Party on Policy regarding the Revision of Standards, the ILO Governing Body has decided that, with respect to underground work the States parties to Convention No. 45 should be invited to contemplate ratifying the Safety and Health in Mines Convention, 1995 (No. 176), and possibly denouncing Convention No. 45 even though the latter instrument has not been formally revised (see GB.283/LILS/WP/PRS/1/2, paragraph 13). Contrary to the old approach based on the outright prohibition of underground work for all female workers, modern standards focus on risk assessment and risk management and provide for sufficient preventive and protective measures for mineworkers, irrespective of gender, whether employed in surface or underground sites. As the Committee has noted in its General Survey of 2001 on night work of women in industry in relation to Conventions Nos. 4, 41 and 89, "the question of devising measures that aim at protecting women generally because of their gender (as distinct from those aimed at protecting women’s reproductive and infant-nursing roles) has always been and continues to be controversial" (paragraph 186).
3. In the light of the foregoing observations, and also considering that the present trend is no doubt to remove all gender-specific restrictions on underground work, the Committee invites the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of the Safety and Health in Mines Convention, 1995 (No. 176), which shifts the emphasis from a specific category of workers to the safety and health protection of all mineworkers, and possibly also to the denunciation of Convention No. 45. In this respect, the Committee recalls that according to established practice, the Convention will be next open to denunciation during a one-year period from 30 May 2007 to 30 May 2008. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any decision taken in this regard.
The Committee notes the reports supplied by the Government. In particular, the Committee notes the request by the Government for technical assistance from the International Labour Office with a view to the revision of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation No. 807 to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. The Committee therefore hopes that the Office will take the necessary measures to provide the Government with the technical assistance requested.
In the meantime, the Committee wishes to recall the various points on which the Government has to take measures with a view to giving effect to the respective provisions of the Convention.
1. Article 1, paragraph 2, of the Convention. The Committee recalls that measures will have to be taken to determine the hazards arising from machinery operated by manual power for the purpose of determining the applicability of the Convention to such machinery. It also recalls that this has to be done in consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned.
2. Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4. The Committee recalls that in its previous comments it noted that the enumeration of dangerous parts in sections 100 to 103 of Regulation No. 807 does not include all the parts referred to in Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee also noted that the labour authorities were evaluating all measures intended to give effect to the Convention. The Committee referred in this respect to paragraphs 82 et seq. of its 1987 General Survey on safety in the working environment, in which it indicates that "it is essential for the effective application of Part II of the Convention that the national legislation designate those parts of machinery that present danger and require appropriate guarding", and that the initial definition of the dangerous machinery and parts thereof should as a minimum cover all those parts explicitly referred to in Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Convention. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures to give effect to this provision of the Convention.
3. Furthermore, the Committee recalls that, among these measures, consideration should be given to the possibility of determining the cases in which those manufacturing and selling machinery are obliged to provide guards and to determining the dangerous parts of machinery so as to include all the parts explicitly referred to in the Convention under the terms of Article 4.
4. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that appropriate penalties are imposed in the event of failure to comply with current provisions on the guarding of machinery (Article 15, paragraph 1).
The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that, by virtue of Article 16 of the Convention, any national laws or regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention shall be made by the competent authority after consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned and, as appropriate, manufacturers’ organizations.
Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its report.
The Committee notes the Government's statement that, although the Labour Code (Act No. 16-92 of May 1992) does not prohibit the employment of women workers in underground work, in practice problems do not arise in relation to underground work by women because there are no underground mines in the Dominican Republic. The Committee further notes the Government's indications in the report regarding its efforts to improve occupational safety and health for all.
The Committee asks the Government to communicate information on any change which may affect the application of the Convention.
1. Article 1, paragraph 2, of the Convention. In its previous direct request the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to determine the risk that machinery operated by manual power represents for the physical safety of the worker and whether the Convention should apply to such machinery. It also asked for information on the consultations held on this subject with the organizations of employers and workers.
2. With regard to Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4, the Committee observed that section 141 of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation No. 807 requires those manufacturing and selling machinery to provide guards whenever necessary.
In this connection, the Committee referred to paragraphs 82 et seq. of its 1987 General Survey "Safety in the Working Environment", in which it indicates that "it is essential for the effective application of Part II of the Convention that the national legislation designate those parts of machinery that present a danger and require appropriate guarding", and that the initial definition of the dangerous machinery and parts thereof should as a minimum cover all those parts enumerated in Article 2(3) and (4) of the Convention.
The Committee noted that the enumeration of dangerous parts in sections 100 to 103 of Regulation No. 807 does not include all the parts explicitly enumerated in Article 2 of the Convention. It also noted that the labour authorities are evaluating all measures intended to give proper effect to the Convention.
The Committee expressed the hope that among these measures, consideration would be given to the possibility of determining the cases in which those manufacturing and selling machinery are obliged to provide guards, and to determining the dangerous parts of machinery so as to include all the parts expressly enumerated in the Convention.
3. The Committee also asked the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that appropriate penalties were imposed in the event of failure to comply with current provisions on the guarding of machinery. The Committee notes with interest that, according to the information in the Government's report, the National Health and Safety Directorate of the Ministry of Labour has requested technical assistance from the ILO in revising Regulation No. 807 on Occupational Safety and Health in order to update it and harmonize it with the provisions of the Convention. The Committee hopes that the revised Regulation on Occupational Safety and Health will enable effect to be given to the provisions of the Convention. In this connection the Committee points out to the Government that under Article 16 of the Convention, any national laws or regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention must be framed by the competent authority after consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned and, as appropriate, manufacturers' organizations.
The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its report.
In its previous comments the Committee noted the promulgation of the Labour Code (Act No. 16-92 of May 1992) which does not establish that women may not be employed in underground work. The Government indicates in its report that it is engaged in the necessary formalities, including consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers, to denounce the Convention.
The Committee notes this information and recalls paragraph 142 of its General Survey of 1988 on equality in employment and occupation, which states that elimination of the protection afforded to women cannot be deemed the only measure necessary in order to promote equality in employment and occupation. Other measures can be taken to satisfy the requirements of the promotion of equality.
The Committee asks the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that national legislation and practice are consistent with its commitments made by ratifying the Convention.
In previous comments, the Committee noted the enactment of the Labour Code (Act No. 16-92 of May 1992), which does not prohibit the employment of women workers in underground work.
The Committee notes the Government's statement that in practice problems do not arise in relation to underground work by women because there are no underground mines in the Dominican Republic. The Government states that when constructing dams, for which it was necessary to excavate tunnels, the authorities took measures to prevent the engagement of women in this underground work. These measures consisted of supervising the recruitment of workers and monitoring the full period of work.
The Committee wishes to recall that the general policy developed by the ILO is to ensure a safe and healthy working environment for all and to adapt work to the capacities of the worker, in so far as is reasonable. Where the working environment is not "safe and healthy for all", it is legitimate in accordance with the appropriate international instruments to provide protection for persons with specific needs, arising out of their age or physiological condition, which may include the prohibition of performing the work in question.
The Committee considers that, in view of the absence of a decision respecting the denunciation of the Convention, it is necessary to undertake an examination of the conditions of work in mines in the light of scientific and technical knowledge with a view to determining whether this working environment is reasonably safe and healthy for all in the sense set out in the Occupational Health Services Convention, 1985 (No. 161). The Committee considers that if it is found that this is not the case, maintenance of the protection provided by the Convention would be justified and that consideration could even be given to extending it to other underground work of the same type.
The Committee requests the Government to continue informing it of the measures that have been taken or are envisaged in this respect.
The Committee notes the adoption of the Labour Code (Act No. 16-92 of 29 May 1992) which does not maintain the prohibition upon employing women in underground work. It notes the statement by the Government that there are no underground mines in the Dominican Republic, since the extraction of minerals takes place in open mines.
The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures which have been taken or are envisaged to ensure that national law is in conformity with the international commitments which have been undertaken.
The Committee notes the Government's report.
Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee refers to sections 95 and 96 of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation No. 807, which use the term "machinery" without specifying whether it includes machinery operated by manual power.
The Committee notes that, according to the Government's report, the labour authorities are preparing to take decisions in order to determine the risk that such machinery represents for the physical safety of the worker and whether it should be considered to be machinery for the purposes of the application of the Convention.
The Committee wishes to refer to paragraph 27 of its General Survey on Safety in the Working Environment in which it emphasises the importance of such decisions, in view of the risks of injury involved in the use of such machinery.
The Committee requests the Government to report on the measures that have been taken or are envisaged to determine the risk of injury resulting from machinery operated by manual power and to decide on the application of the Convention to this machinery, and on the consultations that have been held in this respect with the organisations of employers and workers.
With regard to Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4, the Committee notes that section 141 of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation No. 807 obliges those manufacturing and selling machinery to provide guards whenever necessary.
In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 82 et seq. of its 1987 General Survey on Safety in the Working Environment in which it indicates that "it is essential for the effective application of Part II of the Convention that the national legislation designate those parts of machinery that present danger and require appropriate guarding", and that the initial definition of the dangerous machinery and parts thereof should as a minimum cover all those parts enumerated in Article 2, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Convention.
The Committee notes that the enumeration of dangerous parts in sections 100 to 103 of Regulation No. 807 does not include all the parts explicitly enumerated in Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee also notes that, according to the Government's report, the labour authorities are evaluating all measures intended to give effect to the Convention.
The Committee hopes that among these measures, consideration will be given to the possibility of determining the cases in which those manufacturing and selling machinery are obliged to provide guards, and to determining the dangerous parts of machinery so as to include all the parts enumerated in the Convention.
The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed in this respect.
Article 15. In its report, the Government states that the labour authorities are examining the penalties to be applied in the event of the current provisions respecting the guarding of machinery not being observed.
The Committee requests the Government to supply information on the measures that have been taken to ensure that appropriate penalties are prescribed in the event of these provisions not being observed.
Article 16. The Committee notes that, according to the information supplied by the Government in its report, Regulation No. 807 is being revised in order to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention.
The Committee requests the Government to supply information on the consultations that have been held with organisations of employers and workers in accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of the Convention.
The Committee notes that the Government's report that was due for the period ending 30 June 1988 has not been received. The Committee has, however, noted the information contained in the last (unrequested) report which was supplied by the Government in 1987, to the effect that the draft of a text to amend a number of provisions in the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations in order to give fuller effect to the Convention has not yet been adopted and is being revised. The Committee once again hopes that it will be possible to adopt this draft in the near future and that the Government will not fail to supply information on the progress achieved in this respect.