Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on working time, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 1 (hours of work (industry)), 14 (weekly rest period (industry)), 30 (hours of work (commerce and offices)), 89 (night work (women)), 106 (weekly rest (commerce and offices), and 175 (part-time work) together.

The Committee notes the observations of the Coordinating Committee of Agricultural, Commercial, Industrial and Financial Associations (CACIF) on the application of Convention No. 175, received on 30 August 2024.

Hours of work

Article 2 of Convention No. 1 and Article 3 of Convention No. 30. Limits on normal hours of work.The maquila sector. Further to it previous comments, the Committee notes that, in its reports, the Government does not provide its comments with respect to the 2014 observations of the General Confederation of Workers of Guatemala (CGTG), alleging that offences in relation to working time are being committed in the maquila sector. The Committee notes that while the Labour Code does not regulate the hours of work specifically applicable to this sector, section 125 thereof provides that the executive board, through agreements of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (MTPS), must specify how the provisions on working days apply both for enterprises where the work has very specific characteristics or is continuous, such as transport and communication enterprises. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the way in which section 125 of the Labour Code is applied in practice, specifying: (i) the enterprises where the work has very specific characteristics or is continuous, according to this provision; and (ii) the daily and weekly limits to hours of work for enterprises covered by the above provision and in the maquila enterprises. It also requests the Government to provide any supplementary legislation that has been adopted under the above provision.

Articles 2(c) and 4 of Convention No. 1 and Article 6 of Convention No. 30. Variable distribution of normal hours of work over periods longer than a week. Further to its previous comments on the application in practice of the legislation on hours of work in certain public bodies, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that the working time of some workers of the Office of the Prosecutor for children and young persons, under the Guatemalan Social Security Institute (IGSS) and the Institute for Criminal Law Legal Aid, organize through shift work. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on how shift work is implemented in the above-mentioned bodies, specifying: (i) the categories of workers or types of activities to which it applies; (ii) the working days and rest days included; (iii) the number of shifts per day and the maximum duration of each shift; and (iv) whether limits have been established for the duration of average weekly shift work, as well as periods used as references to calculate the average for these limits.

Articles 3 and 6(1)(b) and (2) of Convention No. 1 and Articles 5 and 7(2) and (3) of Convention No. 30. Temporary exceptions. Circumstances and limits of additional hours of work. Further to its previous comments on overtime pay owed by a municipal water company, the Committee notes the Government’s information that it signed an agreement with the complainant union concerning the additional hours, and had been convicted by the courts in this regard. Regarding the circumstances in which recourse to overtime is authorized, the Committee notes that: (i) neither section 121 nor 122 of the Labour Code fixes in a precise and exhaustive manner the circumstances in which recourse to overtime is authorized - only cases of public calamities and disasters are mentioned; and (ii) section 121(2) provides for unpaid overtime under circumstances (errors or omissions committed by the employee) which are not covered by the Conventions. In addition, with regard to limits on overtime work, the Committee notes that section 122 of the Labour Code provides that normal and additional hours cannot exceed a total of 12 hours per day, without other limits being set.

The Committee recalls that exceptions to the limits on normal hours of work are authorized in the Conventions in very limited and well-circumscribed cases (General Survey of 2018 concerning working-time instruments, paragraph 109), as are increases in overtime and cases of accident, actual or threatened, force majeure, or urgent work to machinery or in plants. The Committee also recalls that Convention No. 30 requires not only a daily limit of additional hours of work undertaken by workers in commerce and offices, but also a yearly limit. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged, including by revising the above provisions of the Labour Code, to ensure that both in law and practice that: (i) recourse to additional hours of work is limited to clear, well-defined circumstances, taking into account the provisions of the Conventions; and (ii) other reasonable legal limits to additional working hours are established and respected.

Article 6(2) of Convention No. 1 and Article 7(4) of Convention No. 30. Overtime pay. The Committee notes that while Civil Service Act and its Regulations do not explicitly regulate public workers’ overtime work, the Government indicates that section 46 of Agreement No. 2-98, adopting the rules of procedure of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, indicates that work carried out that exceeds normal working hours established for this body shall be considered additional and paid, where a budget is available and the Attorney General of the Republic has authorized it. In this respect, the Committee recalls the need to provide for the payment of overtime hours in all circumstances at no less than 125 per cent of the usual wage rate, in accordance with the Conventions. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged both in law and practice to guarantee overtime pay for public servants with the rate of pay set out in the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the cases in which overtime worked in the public sector has not been remunerated due to budget restrictions or lack of authorization of the competent authority, specifying both how often such cases occurred and the activities and approximate number of workers concerned.

Weekly rest

Articles 2, 4 and 5 of Convention No. 14 and Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Convention No. 106. Principle of weekly rest. Permanent or temporary exceptions to weekly rest. Compensatory rest. The Committee notes that the Government has provided information on the decisions issued by the General Labour Inspectorate authorizing workers to work on weekly rest days and days off under section 128 of the Labour Code. The Committee also notes that this provision establishes that in enterprises where the work has very specific characteristics or is continuous, as determined by law, or in highly-skilled activities, as determined by the General Labour Inspectorate, work may be carried out on weekly rest days. However, in these cases the worker is entitled, in addition to being paid for weekly rest, to be paid for this time, calculated as overtime. With regard to the foregoing, the Committee recalls the importance of keeping recourse to from the general 24-hour weekly rest rule to what is strictly necessary, and for such exceptions to be authorized under clearly specified conditions, which, in commerce and offices, must also be limited to the cases listed in Article 7(1) of Convention No. 106 (General Survey of 2018 concerning working-time instruments,, paragraphs 226 and 260). The Committee also recalls the importance of granting compensatory rest in all cases to workers deprived of their weekly rest, irrespective of any monetary compensation, as required by Articles 7(2) and 8(3) of Convention No. 106 (General Survey of 2018 concerning working-time instruments,, paragraphs 252 and 253). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application of section 128 of the Labour Code in practice, specifying: (i) the types of workplaces concerned and the categories of workers covered in the authorized exceptions to the ordinary scheme of weekly rest (including in the General Labour Inspectorate) under this provision; and (ii) any supplementary legislation that has been adopted in connection with the provision in question. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged, both in law and practice, to ensure that all workers covered by the exceptions authorized by the above-mentioned provision are granted compensatory rest of at least 24 consecutive hours for each seven-day period, independent of any monetary compensation.

Part-time work

Articles 1–10 of Convention No. 175. Protection for part-time workers. Further to its previous comment on the constitutional decision to suspend Governmental Agreement 89-2019 which adopted the implementing Regulations for Convention No. 175, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that in its decision of 15 July 2021, the Constitutional Court dismissed the claim of unconstitutionality filed by the workers and revoked the temporary suspension of certain provisions of the above Regulations that had been issued in 2019.

With regard to its previous comment on new measures adopted in application of the Convention, the Committee also notes the Government's indication that: (i) the three legislative initiatives registered before Congress relating to the application of the Convention were referred to the Labour Committee for its review and corresponding decision, and were still pending as the first debate on the initiatives was under way; and (ii) the subcommittee on labour legislation and policy of the National Tripartite Committee on Labour Relations and Freedom of Association (CNTRLLS) included in its workplan for 2023–2024 the examination of the three legislative initiatives mentioned above, with the aim of formulating a tripartite opinion on these, to be referred to the CNTRLLS for follow-up before Congress. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the developments of the legislative initiatives on part-time work.

Articles 6 and 11 of the Convention.Social security protection. Legislation. Consultation with the social partners. The Committee notes that the Government reports the adoption of Governmental Agreement No. 258-2022 of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (MTPS), adopting Agreement No. 1522 of the IGSS Governing Board, containing the Regulations for the protection of part-time workers under the Convention. The Government indicates that Agreement No. 1522 of the IGSS aims to provide health services and cash benefits through sickness, maternity, accidents and disability, and old age and survivors schemes, for part-time workers, in the same conditions as for full-time workers who are affiliated with the IGSS.

The Committee notes that, in its observations, the CACIF indicates that, under Agreement No. 1522, employers’ contributions are calculated and paid based on the minimum monthly wage in force, as if for full-time employment. Despite this, however, coverage of part-time workers in case of common sickness, and the disability, old-age and survivors schemes are not applied in the same conditions as for full-time workers, which CACIF deems discriminatory. CACIF indicates that it set up a working group with the IGSS to attempt to resolve these issues but has not reached an agreement. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this respect and to specify whether consultations were held with the most representative organizations of employers and workers prior to the adoption of Agreement No. 1522 of the IGSS which regulates access to social security protection for part-time workers.

Article 8. Exclusion of part-time workers with hours of work or earnings below specified thresholds. The Committee notes that the neither the Regulations nor Agreement No. 1522 of the IGSS contain specific provisions on income thresholds and duration of working time under which part-time workers are excluded from the scope of the social security schemes, monetary allowances for termination of an employment contract, annual leave, days off and sick leave. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether such thresholds for the minimum number of working hours or earnings exist and, if so, to describe such thresholds and indicate whether they are periodically revised and what percentage of part-time workers are excluded under application of such thresholds.

Article 9. Measures to facilitate access to productive and freely chosen part-time work. The Committee notes the Government’s information on the electronic registration of part-time contracts, training provided and inspections conducted relating to these contracts, as well as on part-time workers affiliated with the IGSS. The Committee also notes that the Government has not provided information on the adoption of specific measures to facilitate access to part-time employment, as set forth in the revision of the corresponding legislation, the use of employment services, and the consideration of this work arrangement within employment policies. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged, in law or practice, to facilitate access to productive and freely chosen part-time work, which meets the needs of both employers and workers, specifying whether these measures cover those envisaged in Article 9(1)–(3) of the Convention.

Night Work (Women)

Article 3 of Convention No. 89. Prohibition of night work for women. The Committee notes that in previous reports the Government affirmed that the employment of women in night work positions is a reality in the country and that the Convention has long ceased to be implemented. In this respect, the Committee recalls that pregnant and nursing women engaged in night work may be particularly vulnerable, and emphasizes the importance of women night workers who are in this situation being provided with alternative work (General Survey of 2018 concerning working-time instruments, paragraph 545). In this context, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to protect night workers, particularly with regard to maternity. Noting also that the country is still bound by Convention No. 89 and that the denunciation window will be open between 27 February 2031 and 27 February 2032, the Committee invites the Government to schedule its denunciation at an appropriate time.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Articles 1–10 of the Convention. Protection for part-time workers. The Committee notes the Government’s first report received in 2019 as well as the supplementary information provided in 2020 in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th Session (June 2020). It also takes note of the observations from the Autonomous Popular Trade Union Movement and the Global Unions of Guatemala, received on 5 November 2019 and 16 October 2020, and the Government’s reply to these observations, as well as the observations from the Coordinating Committee of Agricultural, Commercial, Industrial and Financial Associations (CACIF) and the International Organisation of Employers (IOE), received on 1 October 2020.

The Committee notes: (i) the adoption of the Regulations on Convention No. 175 in 2019 (Governmental Agreement 89-2019) with a view to ensure the effective application of the Convention; (ii) the decision of the Constitutional Court of 26 September 2019, suspending the application of various provisions of the Regulations pending the adoption of its final ruling on the matter; and (iii) the three legislative initiatives before Parliament concerning the application of the Convention: initiative 5477 (Act regulating Convention No. 175), initiative 5626 (Act implementing Convention No. 175) and initiative 5778 (amendments to the Labour Code).

Furthermore, the Committee notes, from the information provided by the Government and the social partners, that there is a debate between them at the national level on the question of part-time work and the application of the Convention. The Committee hopes that solutions to this debate can be found through social dialogue, including in the National Tripartite Committee on Labour Relations and Freedom of Association. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the evolution of this debate, as well as on any measures adopted regarding the application of the Convention, including in relation to the above-mentioned legislative initiatives, and on the results of the ongoing constitutional procedure.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes the observations from the Trade Union of Plant and Well Operators and Guards of the Municipal Water Company and Allied Workers (SITOPGEMA) and the General Confederation of Workers of Guatemala (CGTG), which were received on 13 March 2014 and 1 September 2014, respectively.

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of work. Overtime hours. In its previous comment, the Committee had noted that the CGTG and the Guatemalan Trade Union, Indigenous and Campesino Movement (MSICG) alleged excessive hours of work and non-payment of overtime in the maquila (export processing), transport and private security sectors. The Committee notes the information in the Government’s report on labour inspection operations carried out in the maquila industry in 2013 and 2014, as a result of which 636 new cases of labour rights violations in the industry were referred to the labour inspectorate in 2014, which have to go through all the administrative channels. Furthermore, the Committee notes the Government’s list of 1,801 pending cases brought before the first-instance labour courts of the Department of Guatemala between 2012 and June 2014, and also the list of pending cases brought before the first-instance courts of the Republic of Guatemala between 2012 and June 2014; both lists relate to enterprises in the maquila, transport and private security sectors. While noting this information, the Committee observes that the CGTG reiterates its allegation that violations relating to hours of work and the payment of overtime in the maquila sector are continuing. The Committee requests the Government to send its observations on this matter and to continue taking steps to give full effect to the Convention.

In addition, the Committee recalls that it previously asked the Government to send detailed information on the execution of the court ruling ordering the retroactive payment of overtime worked by the employees of the Municipal Water Company of Guatemala City (EMPAGUA). The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the Fifth Labour and Social Security Court handed down a decision on 16 June 2014 instructing the Auxiliary Services Centre of the judiciary to take action, with a view to providing information on the follow-up to the payment order, and that the court is currently waiting for SITOPGEMA to send a document accrediting the decision-making status of the new members of the SITOPGEMA executive committee. The Committee hopes that the final settlement of all the amounts due to the EMPAGUA workers will take place soon and requests the Government to keep it informed of any new developments in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Article 3 of the Convention. Prohibition of night work for women. Further to its previous comment, the Committee notes that no concrete progress has as yet been made for either the ratification of the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), or the denunciation of Convention No. 89, even though the Government affirms that the employment of women in night work positions is a reality in the country and that the Convention has long ceased to be implemented. The Committee wishes to point out, in this respect, that contrary to the opinion given by the legal services of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (Opinion No. 124-2013, a copy of which was attached to the Government’s latest report), the eventual ratification of Convention No. 171 will not ipso jure involve the immediate denunciation of Convention No. 89, which would need to be formally denounced in accordance with the procedure and within the time limits set out in Article 15(2). The Committee again invites the Government to take steps to move towards the ratification of Convention No. 171 and the denunciation of Convention No. 89 and to keep the Office informed of any decisions taken in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of work – Overtime hours. The Committee notes the Government’s reply to the comments of the Indigenous and Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement of Guatemala (MSICG) dated 10 September 2012, regarding allegedly excessive working hours imposed on the staff of the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Children and Young People, of the Guatemalan Social Security Institute and of the Institute of Public Criminal Defence. The Government indicates that while employees of the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Children and Young People carry out 24-hour shifts, they are not subject to forced labour, as their health and life are not affected and they have the right to compensatory rest in accordance with the law regulating the warning system Alba-Kenneth. The Government adds that, according to the Labour Division of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the organization of work in shifts is necessary to ensure that children are protected and shifts are organized with fairness in order to comply with the relevant legislation. As regards the employees of the Guatemalan Social Security Institute and the Institute of Public Criminal Defence, the Government refers to the respective internal regulations and explains that work carried out in excess of the normal hours of work, when duly authorized, is remunerated as overtime work. Noting that the MSICG’s comments appear to refer especially to cases in which employees are de facto obliged to perform long overtime hours without always receiving extra pay, the Committee requests the Government to provide additional information on the manner in which working time legislation is effectively enforced in practice. The Committee also requests the Government to refer to the comments made under the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1), which addresses similar problems of excessively long hours of work and unpaid overtime in the industrial sector.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of work. Overtime hours. The Committee notes the Government’s explanations in response to the comments made previously by the Indigenous and Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement of Guatemala (MSICG) concerning excessive hours of work in the maquila (export processing) sector. The Government indicates that, under sections 59 and 60 of the Labour Code, the internal work rules of every enterprise must include, amongst others, detailed particulars on working time. The Government adds that all internal work rules need to be previously approved by the labour inspectorate and such approval is denied when regulations are not in conformity with article 102(g) of the Constitution establishing limits to hours of work. The Committee notes that, according to information supplied by the Government, there have been very few cases of non-compliance with working time legislation in the maquila industry confirmed by court decisions in 2012–13, while a number of cases are still pending. The Committee notes, in this connection, the communication of the General Confederation of Workers of Guatemala (CGTG), received on 30 August 2013 and transmitted to the Government on 18 September 2013, which lists more than a dozen maquila enterprises which allegedly require their employees to work more than eight hours per day without overtime pay. The CGTG also refers to similar problems observed in the transport sector and in private security enterprises. Given the seriousness and extent of the alleged infringements, which are similar to those on which the Committee has been commenting under the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), the Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the manner in which the application of the Convention is enforced in the maquila sector, including labour inspection results, copies of relevant court decisions and a list of cases still pending identifying the number of workers involved for each pending case. The Committee also requests the Government to provide any comments it may wish to make in response to the observations of the CGTG.

In addition, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning the latest developments in the case brought before the courts by the Trade Union of Workers of Operators of Plants, Wells and Guards of the Municipal Water Company (SITOPGEMA) with respect to the failure of the Municipal Water Company of Guatemala City (EMPAGUA) to pay its employees for long overtime hours. The Government confirms that both the Supreme Court, in its decision of 18 September 2009, and the Constitutional Court in its decision of 28 July 2011 have upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal in favour of the SITOPGEMA and therefore the decision for the retroactive payment of overtime hours worked should now be properly executed. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to provide in its next report detailed information on the final settlement of all the amounts due to the workers of EMPAGUA.

[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2014.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of work – Overtime hours. The Committee notes the observations made by the Trade Union of Plant and Well Operators and Guards of the Municipal Water Company and Allied Workers (SITOPGEMA), made in a communication received on 2 October 2012 and transmitted to the Government on 12 October 2012, concerning the application of the Convention. It notes that these observations follow up on those previously made by SITOPGEMA concerning the situation of workers at the Municipal Water Company of Guatemala City (EMPAGUA), who alternate work periods of 24 consecutive hours with rest periods of 48 consecutive hours without being paid for the overtime that they work. SITOPGEMA points out that decision No. 1088-2004-561 of 16 April 2008 of the labour and social insurance tribunal, which rejected the demand made by the workers concerned and to which the Committee referred in its observation of 2008, has since been overturned by the appeal court and the other courts concerned, and so the right of these workers to be paid for the overtime worked is thus recognized definitively. However, the union adds that new procedures for implementing this decision and calculating the exact amounts owed are being examined in the national courts and consequently the demand first put forward by SITOPGEMA more than ten years ago has still not been settled. The Committee requests the Government to provide any comments that it wishes to make in response to the observations made by SITOPGEMA and to reply in detail to its observation of 2009.

The Committee also notes the observations made by the Indigenous and Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement of Guatemala (MSICG), in a communication received on 10 September 2012 and transmitted to the Government on 28 September 2012, which refer to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), but also have some relevance with regard to the application of Convention No. 1. The MSICG states, in particular, that textile industry employees in the maquila (export processing) sector are obliged to work more than 12 hours a day, without the labour inspection services taking any steps to prevent employers from imposing working days whose length exceeds legal limits. The Committee requests the Government to provide any comments it wishes to make in reply to the observations of the MSICG.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Exceeding normal hours of work – Overtime. The Committee notes the observations made by the Indigenous and Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement of Guatemala (MSICG) in a communication received on 10 September 2012 and transmitted to the Government on 28 September 2012. The MSICG’s allegations specifically concern: the excessive working hours imposed on the staff of the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Children and Young People following the introduction of a missing child warning system; working time regulations pertaining to the employees of the Guatemalan Social Security Institute and the Institute of Public Criminal Defence; and the obligation on employees in some municipalities to do unpaid overtime for work of a political nature for the mayors of these communities. The Committee requests the Government to provide any comments it may wish to make in reply to the observations of the MSICG.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of
work – Overtime hours. Further to its previous comments relating to the observations made by the Trade Union of Operators of Plants and Wells, Guards of the Municipal Water Company and its Annexes (SITOPGEMA), the Committee notes the Government’s indications concerning the nature, scope and conditions governing the adoption of the internal rules for the work in an enterprise. It also notes the indications that the Municipal Water Company of the City of Guatemala (EMPAGUA) is an enterprise which has to provide an essential service on a continuous basis and that it is therefore necessary to ensure the presence of the personnel responsible for the production, maintenance and distribution of water. Noting that the rules were adopted by consensus between the employer and the workers, the Committee nevertheless notes that the rules provide for a working day of 24 hours followed by 48 hours of rest for career workers not subject to limitations on the ordinary working day, which means a working week that may be as long as 72 hours. The Committee is bound to recall once again that the Convention establishes a double cumulative limit, namely eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week. It only allows exemptions from these maximum limits in restricted and well-defined circumstances, namely: (i) the distribution of hours of work over the week (Article 2(b)); (ii) the averaging of hours of work over a period of three weeks in the case of shift work (Article 2(c)); (iii) processes that are necessarily carried on continuously within the limit of 56 hours in the week (Article 4); (iv) the averaging of hours of work in exceptional cases (Article 5); and (v) permanent exceptions (preparatory, complementary or intermittent work) and temporary exceptions (exceptional cases of pressure of work) (Article 6). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures without further delay to ensure that hours in excess of normal hours of work are limited to the cases envisaged by the Convention. It requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any developments in this respect and recalls that it may, if it so wishes, avail itself of the technical assistance of the ILO, through its Subregional Office in San José, in relation to the measures to be envisaged to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention.

Furthermore, with regard to the observations made previously by the Trade Union Confederation of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) concerning daily hours of work, which may be in excess of 12 hours in certain enterprises that set productions targets but do not increase wages accordingly, the Committee notes the Government’s explanations according to which, on the one hand, the only sector which sets production targets is the textile sector which, in addition to applying the minimum wage, provides for an increase in the wage of 50 per cent where hours of work are in excess of those set out in the contract and, on the other, no complaint has been made on this subject to the labour inspectorate. Furthermore, with regard to the allegation that in certain industrial enterprises the staff responsible for security may alternate between periods of 24 hours of work and of rest and that the Minister of Labour authorizes collective agreements accepting these conditions, the Committee notes that, according to the Government’s report, the Ministry of Labour may not in any event authorize such irregular conditions, and that a procedure exists (Government Decision
No. 221-94 of 13 May 1994) for the negotiation, registration and denunciation of collective agreements relating to conditions of work in specific enterprises.

Finally, with regard to the amendments to be made to section 122 of the Labour Code, which provides that the working day including overtime hours may not exceed 12 hours, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in the context of the current draft legislative reform, the possibility of amending section 122 has not been addressed, but a discussion is envisaged on this matter in the Tripartite Commission for International Labour Affairs. The Committee therefore requests the Government to keep the Office informed of the outcome of these discussions and recalls that the employment of a worker for four additional hours in the day without any restriction (such as a monthly or annual limit) greatly exceeds the exemptions authorized by the Convention.

Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to refer to the comment that it is making under the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29).

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Total or partial exceptions. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Articles 7 and 8 of Convention No. 106.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Article 3 of the Convention. Prohibition of night work for women. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it observed that the Convention had for all practical purposes ceased to apply and that the Government should consider the ratification of the Night Work Convention, 1990, (No. 171), which offered protection to all night workers irrespective of gender in all branches and occupations. In its reply, the Government indicates that a study was previously undertaken by services of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, which recommended the ratification of Convention No. 171 but until now there have been no technical studies to follow up on such recommendation. It adds that the Ministry’s Department for the Promotion of the Woman Worker has suggested the establishment of a technical committee in order to undertake an in-depth analysis of the social and economic dimensions of night work and present its results to all interested organizations and public authorities. The Committee notes, in particular, that in a letter dated 26 May 2008, the Director of the Department for the Promotion of the Woman Worker recommended the denunciation of Convention No. 89 and the ratification of Convention No. 171, bearing in mind that night work was a reality in the country and that Convention No. 89 had long ceased to be implemented. It also notes that in another communication, dated 24 September 2007, the Director of the International Labour Affairs Unit, the General Labour Inspector, the Director General of Labour and the Coordinator of the Technical Council and Legal Affairs, called for the denunciation of Convention No. 89 and cautioned that failing such action the Government was bound to reintroduce the prohibition on women’s night work in order to comply with its international obligations.

The Committee feels once more obliged to refer to paragraph 93 of its General Survey of 2001 on the night work of women in industry in which it expressed the view that any contradiction between the legal obligations arising out of the ratification of an international labour Convention and existing domestic legislation should be properly removed in the interest of preserving a coherent body of international labour standards and giving full meaning to the Organization’s supervisory organs. For all useful purposes, therefore, the Committee recalls that Convention No. 89 may be denounced every ten years and will again be open to denunciation for a period of one year as from 27 February 2011. The Committee again invites the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of Convention No. 171 and to keep the Office informed of any decision taken with respect to Convention No. 89. It also requests the Government to provide documented information on any concrete measures or plan of action that might be undertaken following the recommendations of the Department for the Promotion of the Woman Worker and the results obtained.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Articles 7 and 11(a) of the Convention. Permanent exemptions. The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government concerning the enterprises authorized to grant exemptions from the principle of weekly rest for the 2007–08 period. It also notes that work on rest days or public holidays is performed on a voluntary basis with a corresponding wage increase and that, under section 128 of the Labour Code, any employer who requests an exemption must meet the conditions laid down in the regulations issued by the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare. The Committee requests the Government once again to indicate whether the regulations provided for in section 128 of the Labour Code have been issued and, if so, to transmit a copy.

Recalling that the Convention only allows special weekly rest schemes to be applied where the nature of the work or service, the size of the population to be served or the number of persons employed make it necessary, in consultation with the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations, taking account of all proper social and economic considerations, the Committee requests the Government to state the categories of persons or establishments which are subject to special weekly rest schemes, the reasons for applying such schemes and the consultations held in relation to such exemptions.

Articles 8 and 11(b). Temporary exemptions. Further to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government’s report does not contain any information on the conditions in which temporary exemptions may be granted, compensatory rest granted as a result and also the methods adopted for consultation of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned. While recalling that the Convention only permits temporary exemptions for limited and clearly defined reasons, namely: (i) in case of accident, force majeure or urgent work; (ii) in the event of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances; and (iii) in order to prevent the loss of perishable goods, the Committee requests the Government once again to supply detailed information on these points.

With regard to the observations made by the Trade Union Confederation of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) concerning the hours of work of judges and auxiliary staff at law courts, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that the general labour inspectorate deals with all complaints from workers and trade unions and, in the event of a breach of labour legislation, the inspectorate applies the provisions of section 281 of the Labour Code concerning procedures in cases of infringements. It also notes that, according to information from the Supreme Court of Justice, judges and auxiliary staff at law courts resident in the district for which they are responsible may be required to work outside normal hours, including on the weekly rest day, but only on an exceptional basis and on condition that compensatory rest is granted (to be taken during the following week) as provided for by section 32 of the collective agreement relating to conditions of work concluded between the state judiciary and the trade union of its employees (STOJ).

Part V of the report form. Practical application. The Committee notes the statistical information provided by the Government concerning the failure to remunerate or grant weekly rest for the 2007–08 period. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to supply general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice, including, for example, information relating to the number of workers covered by the legislation, extracts of the reports of the inspection services indicating the number and nature of offences reported and penalties imposed, copies of the relevant collective agreements, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention. Work in excess of normal hours of work – Overtime hours. Further to its previous comments relating to the observations made by the Trade Union of Workers of Operators of Plants, Wells and Guards of the Municipal Water Company and its Annexes (SITOPGEMA), the Committee notes ruling No. 1088-2004-561 of the labour and social insurance tribunal of 16 April 2008. The ruling sets aside the union’s claim for the payment of overtime hours on the basis of the decision of the municipal council of 18 December 1995 approving the internal work rules for staff not subject to limitations on the ordinary daily hours of work of the Municipal Water Company of the City of Guatemala (EMPAGUA). The Committee also notes the indication by the administration of the EMPAGUA that the above decision provides for a working day of 24 hours followed by 48 hours of rest for career workers not subject to limitations on ordinary daily hours of work, or 72 hours of work a week. In this respect, the Committee is bound to recall that the Convention establishes a double cumulative limit, namely eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week. It only allows exemptions from these maximum limits in restricted and well-defined circumstances, namely: (i) the distribution of hours of work over the week (Article 2(b)); (ii) the averaging of hours of work over a period of three weeks in the case of shift work (Article 2(c)); (iii) processes that are necessarily carried on continuously within the limit of 56 hours in the week (Article 4); (iv) the averaging of hours of work in exceptional cases (Article 5); and (v) permanent exceptions (preparatory, complementary or intermittent work) and temporary exceptions (exceptional cases of pressure of work) (Article 6). The Committee also wishes to refer to paragraphs 85 to 168 of the General Survey that it published in 2005 on Conventions Nos 1 and 30 relating to hours of work, which provide a detailed analysis of the requirements of the Convention in relation to the distribution of hours of work and authorized exemptions. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether employers’ and workers’ organizations were consulted before the adoption of above-referenced work the rules by the public authority, in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, and it urges the Government to revise any rules providing for working days of 24 hours, which are manifestly contrary to the most elementary principles of this Convention.

Furthermore, with regard to the observations made in August 2003 by the Trade Union Confederation of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA), the Committee notes that the Government’s report does not contain any reply. It recalls that, according to these observations, a number of enterprises set production targets which can only be achieved by working days that are sometimes in excess of 12 hours, but which nevertheless pay the minimum wage or a wage calculated on a piecework basis, in accordance with section 88(b) of the Labour Code. The union also pointed out that in industrial enterprises staff responsible for security could alternate between periods of 24 hours of work and of rest and that the Minister of Labour authorized collective agreements accepting these conditions. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the current situation and any observations that it deems pertinent in this respect.

Finally, the Committee notes that section 122 of the Labour Code, which provides that the working day including overtime hours may not exceed 12 hours, has still not been amended and that it does not determine the circumstances in which overtime hours may be performed, nor the maximum number of overtime hours that may be authorized in each case. The Committee notes with regret that the question of the harmonization of section 122 of the Labour Code with the provisions of the Convention has been raised for many years without any progress being noted. In this respect, the Committee recalls that in a previous report the Government indicated that the Tripartite Subcommittee on Legal Reforms was due to discuss the amendments to be made to this provision of the Labour Code. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the conclusions of the Subcommittee. It hopes that the necessary measures will be taken without further delay to bring section 122 of the Labour Code into full conformity with the provisions of the Convention.

[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2009.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Article 6 of the Convention. Overtime. Further to its previous comments on the observations submitted by the Trade Union Confederation of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) about the hours of work and overtime of judges and auxiliary staff of law courts, the Committee notes the information supplied by the Supreme Court of Justice that in the event of overtime or work done on weekly rest days or  holidays, the abovementioned personnel in all instances have compensatory rest (to be taken in the course of the following week), as provided in article 32 of the collective agreement on conditions of work concluded between the state judicial body and the union of its workers (STOJ), or else special remuneration. With regard to UNSITRAGUA’s observations on unpaid overtime, mainly in banks and in respect of certain categories of public employees engaged in office work, the Committee notes the information from the Government that the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare has held consultations in a number of banking establishments. It is clear from these consultations and from communications sent by the representatives of a number of national banks that overtime is paid, or else the general labour inspectorate brings legal action to seek redress and obtain sanctions. The Committee asks the Government to refer to its comments under Convention No. 1 in which it noted serious and persistent problems in applying the Convention, particularly with regard to maximum daily hours of work.

Part V of the report form. Practical application. The Committee notes the detailed information sent by the Government on inspections carried out in the banking sector and in the judiciary for the period 2007–08. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied, including extracts of reports by the labour inspection services indicating the number or workers covered by the relevant legislation, the number of contraventions reported in the areas covered by the Convention and the penalties imposed, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the new comments of the Trade Union of Workers of Operators of Plants, Wells and Guards of the Municipal Water Company and its annexes (SITOPGEMA), dated 18 July 2005. These comments contain allegations concerning the procedure followed in the context of the legal action taken by the trade union to obtain payment of the overtime hours imposed upon workers by the municipal water enterprise of the city of Guatemala (EMPAGUA) and follow other comments made by the trade union organization received in July 2004 on the same subject, to which a reply has not yet been received. The Committee requests the Government to provide its observations in response to the comments of the SITOPGEMA and to reply in detail to the comments that it made in 2003 and 2004 concerning the application of the Convention.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the comments communicated by the Trade Union of Workers of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) on 2 June 2005 providing information on the categories of civil servants in the judicial system and auxiliary staff of law courts covered by, or excluded from, the scope of application of the Convention in accordance with the Law of Civil Servants in the Judicial System (Decree No. 48-99) and the Law on Judicial Career (Decree No. 41-99). The Committee hopes that the Government in its next report will reply to these observations as well as to two other observations communicated by UNSITRAGUA in October 2002 and August 2003 concerning unpaid or otherwise non-compensated overtime work, especially in bank offices and the judiciary. The Committee also hopes that the Government will provide a detailed response to the points raised in its previous observation concerning the application of the Convention.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

The Committee notes the communication received in July 2004 from the Trade Union of Workers of Operators of Plants, Wells and Guards of the Municipal Water Company and its Annexes (SITOPGEMA) of Guatemala City. This communication was sent to the Government, which has not made any reply to date.

Article 6 of the Convention. Additional hours. SITOPGEMA asserts that the municipality imposes on the workers of this undertaking a schedule consisting of working 24 hours in succession before each rest period of 48 hours, making a total working week of 72 hours. However, article 102(g) of the Constitution of the Republic states that normal working hours are eight hours per day and 44 hours per week. In addition, Order No. 106 adopted on 8 October 1974 by the municipality of Guatemala and the regulations concerning the staff of the municipality of Guatemala of 28 July 1978 fix the normal length of the working week for municipal workers at 40 hours. The 32 hours per week worked beyond this 40-hour limit therefore constitute overtime and should be remunerated as such. However, the municipality of Guatemala has stopped paying overtime while maintaining the abovementioned schedule. SITOPGEMA concludes that this practice constitutes a violation of the Convention.

As the Committee understands it, the weekly hours of work in the municipal water utility of Guatemala City (EMPAGUA) are unevenly distributed over the week, amounting to 72 hours one week followed by 48 hours the following week, inasmuch as the workers concerned alternate 24 hours of work with 48 hours of rest.

Conditions and limits for overtime. Apart from cases of accidents, urgent work or force majeure, the Convention regulates the cases in which permanent or temporary exceptions may be granted to the rules it lays down with regard to hours of work, namely eight hours per day (nine hours if the weekly hours of work are unevenly distributed) and 48 hours per week. Permanent exceptions are authorized in cases of preparatory or complementary work which must necessarily be carried out outside normal working hours or for categories of persons whose work is essentially intermittent. Temporary exceptions are allowed to enable undertakings to deal with exceptional cases of pressure of work.

The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the type of work carried out by the EMPAGUA factory and well operators and to indicate whether the schedules mentioned by SITOPGEMA are habitual or exceptional. In any case, the public authority regulations establishing permanent or temporary exceptions must be adopted after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether such consultations took place.

By Order No. 106 of 8 October 1974, the municipality of Guatemala adopted the framework agreement and the regulations for fixing the length of the working week at a maximum of 40 hours. The framework agreement states that normal working hours are 40 hours per week and eight hours per day (section 1). Hours worked beyond these limits constitute overtime (section 3). Section 4 of the regulations states that EMPAGUA may adopt the working week not exceeding 40 hours from Monday to Friday in accordance with the governing internal rules of operation. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether any effect has been given to the aforementioned section.

In addition, section 75 of the regulations concerning the staff of the municipality of Guatemala of 28 July 1978 allow overtime to be worked where required by the needs of the service, up to a maximum of four hours per day, except in cases of force majeure. Under Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the maximum number of additional hours which can be authorized in each case must be specified. In its previous comments regarding section 122 of the Labour Code, the Committee considered that the employment of workers for four additional hours per day without any restriction (for example, a monthly or annual limit) went far beyond the exceptions authorized by the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that the number of additional hours authorized is subject to a reasonable monthly or annual limit.

Remuneration for overtime. SITOPGEMA alleges that the overtime worked by EMPAGUA employees is not remunerated. Under section 77 of the regulations fixing the length of a working week at a maximum of 40 hours, additional hours are paid at the regular rate, unless worked on weekly rest days or holidays. However, under Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, additional hours must not only be paid but be subject to a rate of pay which is at least 25 per cent higher than the regular rate. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that additional hours are paid at the rate laid down by the Convention.

The Government is also asked to reply to the points raised by the Committee in its observation of 2003 on the application of the Convention.

Finally, the Committee refers to its comments under the application of Convention No. 29.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee takes note of the information supplied in the Government’s report and attached documents, as well as the comments made by the Trade Union Confederation of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA). It notes, in particular, that the national legislation does not contain at present any prohibition relating to the employment of women at night. The Committee recalls that the Government remains fully bound by the provisions of the Convention until such time as a formal act of denunciation takes effect in accordance with Article 15, paragraph 1, of the Convention. This implies that, as long as the Government does not proceed to denounce the Convention, it has the obligation to honour the commitments made on account of the acceptance of that instrument. In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 92 and 93 of the General Survey of 2001 on the night work of women in industry in which it noted with concern that the same situation prevails in several countries and appealed to the governments concerned to take all necessary measures to ensure that their international commitments are consistent with national laws in this respect.

In addition, the Government’s attention is drawn to paragraphs 191-202 of the same General Survey in which the Committee, referring to the continued relevance of the ILO instruments on women’s night work, concluded that there can be no doubt that the present trend is to move away from a blanket ban on night work for women in industry and that more attention is now being paid to regulating night work for both men and women. In this latter respect, the Committee indicated that the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), was drafted for those countries which would be prepared to eliminate women-specific restrictions on night work and to introduce gender-neutral regulations for all night workers.

Therefore, bearing in mind the fact that for all practical purposes the Convention has long ceased to apply, but also the need for an appropriate legal framework addressing the problems and hazards of night work in general, the Committee invites the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171). It asks the Government to keep it informed of any decisions taken in this regard.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

1. The Government indicates that the Tripartite Subcommittee on Pending Legal Reforms will discuss a change of section 122 of the Labour Code with the aim of establishing the circumstances in which recourse may be made to up to four additional working hours per day. It, further, states that Government Decision No. 6-80 of 9 May 1980 limits the annual maximum of additional hours to 160, while section 122 of the Labour Code fixes the daily limit at 12 hours.

The Committee notes with concern that the harmonization of section 122 of the Labour Code with the requirements for exceptions, as provided for by the Convention, has been under consideration for many years without achieving any progress. It urges the Government to make every effort to bring its legislation into conformity with the Convention in this respect, and requests it to include in its next report information on the steps taken, including with regard to any administrative regulations which might permit even to exceed the 12-hour maximum.

2. Furthermore, the Committee refers to the observation of the Trade Union of Workers of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) of October 2002, stating that, according to Order No. 31-2000 of the Supreme Court, based on the Law of Civil Servants in the Judicial System (which is provided for under section 210 of the Constitution and section 193 of the Labour Code), certain categories of judges and auxiliary staff of law courts may be forced to perform shift work after a normal working day up to 24 hours per day without any compensation for overtime in time or in cash.

The Committee draws the attention to Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention. This provision extends the scope of the Convention to public establishments and administrative services in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work. Auxiliary staff, as far as engaged in the administration of justice, appear to be covered by the Convention, whereas judges rather seem to be not included. They might, however, also be exempted from the application of the Convention in case that, under national law, they are considered to be engaged in connection with the administration of public authority (Article 1(3)(b) of the Convention).

The Committee asks the Government to indicate the categories of staff of the judicial system, which it exempts from the application of the Convention. It, further, requests the Government to inform it on any measures appropriate to ensure that the requirements of the Convention are complied with also with regard to those persons of the staff who are covered by the Convention.

The Committee further takes note of a second observation made by UNSITRAGUA in August 2003 transmitted to the Government on 8 October 2003, which, in addition to the comments of October 2002, draws the attention to cases of unpaid overtime work, mainly occurring in bank offices, and to a special category of public employees, mainly engaged in office work, who, according to UNSITRAGUA’s observation, are deprived of their right to limited working hours because the State disregards their status as employees.

The Committee invites the Government to comment also on these latter observations of UNSITRAGUA.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

Article 7, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, and Article 11(a), of the Convention. The Committee asks the Government to indicate in its next report any regulations issued under section 128 of the Labour Code or practical measures concerning special weekly rest schemes to be applied to specific categories of persons or types of establishments. Please also indicate the measures, which ensure to persons subject to such schemes, a period of weekly rest of at least 24 hours in respect of each period of seven days, and the methods adopted for the consultation of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations.

Article 8, paragraphs 1 and 3, and Article 11(b). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the circumstances in which temporary exemptions may be authorized. It recalls that, under Article 8, paragraph 3, compensatory rest of a total duration of at least 24 hours must be ensured to persons concerned, regardless of monetary compensation. The Committee invites the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention in this respect. Please also provide information on the methods adopted for the consultation of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations, as required by Article 8, paragraph 2.

The Committee takes note of the observations communicated by the Trade Union of Workers of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) in August and September 2003, transmitted to the Government on 8 October 2003, maintaining that it is the practice in parts of the judicial system to compel judges and auxiliary staff at law courts to work up to 24 hours a day, in shifts following the normal working day. According to the Union’s comments, this procedure implies that the persons concerned are deprived of their right to paid weekly rest, embodied in section 126 of the Labour Code, similarly as in cases where workers are employed without their legal status of workers being respected as such. Extensive parts of the observation are related to methods for the calculation of wages, which in the view of UNSITRAGUA are not justified, including discrimination by retaining the payment for the weekly rest day, where workers do not work six consecutive days in the week.

The Government is invited to comment on the observations of UNSITRAGUA.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

1. Referring to the Government’s report and the information provided in reply to its previous comments, the Committee observes with regret continued failure to comply with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention in that the Labour Code, section 122 of which provides that a working day including overtime must not exceed 12 hours, still does not determine the circumstances in which overtime may be worked and the maximum number of overtime hours which may be authorized in each instance. The Committee expresses the hope that the various committees consulted on the matter will soon be in the position to present their conclusions, and it urges the Government to make every effort to take the appropriate steps in the very near future.

2. The Committee notes the observation made by the Trade Union of Workers of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) in August 2003 and transmitted to the Government on 8 October 2003, maintaining that, although a number of undertakings fix production targets, which can only be reached by overtime work sometimes exceeding 12 hours per day, they pay the minimum wage or wages calculated on the basis of piece-work, as provided for under section 88(b) of the Labour Code. The Union further observes that in guarding and security services of industrial undertakings shifts of 24 hours alternate with rests of 24 hours and that the Labour Ministry authorizes collective agreements containing working conditions as described before.

The Committee invites the Government to comment on the observations communicated by UNSITRAGUA.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

1. Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to indicate any regulations or determinations made by the Labour Inspectorate on the circumstances in which work on the weekly rest day may be authorized, in accordance with section 128 of the Labour Code. Please also indicate any provisions made for compensatory periods of rest for the suspensions and diminutions made in virtue of Article 4 of the Convention, or any agreements or customs, which already provide for such periods.

The Committee further asks the Government to provide information on any decrees issued by the Minister of Labour, according to sections 169 and 190 of the Labour Code, on special working conditions in the transport sector, as defined under Article 1, paragraph 1(d), of the Convention, and on individual arrangements, agreed according to section 189 of the Labour Code, on weekly rest for workers engaged in transport on inland waterways.

2. Furthermore, the Committee takes note of the observation communicated by the Trade Union of Workers of Guatemala (UNSITRAGUA) in August 2003, transmitted to the Government on 8 October 2003, observing that some private employers withhold payment for the day of weekly rest from workers who do not work six consecutive days in the week.

The Government is invited to comment on the observations of UNSITRAGUA.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes the Government's report and the information supplied in reply to its previous direct request. With reference to its comments on the application of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1), the Committee recalls the need to modify section 122 of the Labour Code, which stipulates that a working day including additional hours may not exceed 12 hours. The Committee once more wishes to recall that the exceptions provided for under Article 7 of the Convention, must remain within reasonable limits, and that the authorization of four additional hours of work a day, without providing other guarantees, such as a monthly or annual limit, greatly exceeds the exceptions authorized by the Convention and is clearly contrary to the spirit in which the latter was drafted. The Government indicates in its report on the application of the Convention that, in response to the Committee's comments, it will take steps necessary to establish, after consultation with the employers' and workers' representative organizations, the circumstances in which recourse may be made to additional hours of work, and also the maximum number of additional hours which may be authorized in each case. The Committee hopes that these steps will be taken in the near future and requests the Government to keep the ILO informed of all progress achieved in this connection.

Furthermore, the Committee refers to its observation of 1981, in which it noted that the Government Decision No. 6-80 of 9 May 1980 gave effect to the provisions of the Convention by fixing a reasonable annual limit to the number of additional hours authorized. It reiterates its request for clarification of the legal situation resulting from the application of Decision No. 6-80, and of section 122 of the Labour Code to workers covered by the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes that the Government refers to its report of 1989 regarding the list of relevant legislation.

However, the Committee notes that the provision of section 148, subsection (b), of the Labour Code (Decree No. 1441 of 1961), which used to prohibit women's night work was deleted by virtue of Decree No. 64-92 regarding the reform of the Labour Code (Diario de centroam rica, 2 Dec. 1992, No. 23, pp. 521-524). Section 148 of the Labour Code now prohibits night work only of minors, but not of women in general.

The Committee requests the Government to supply information on any measures taken to prohibit the night work of women without distinction of age in any public or private industrial undertaking, in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the Convention.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1998, published 87th ILC session (1999)

The Committee notes the Government's report and the information provided in reply to its previous direct request. The Committee's previous comments concerned in particular section 122 of the Labour Code, which provided that a working day including overtime could not exceed 12 hours. Noting that the Labour Code, as amended in 1995, reproduces this same provision, the Committee recalls once again that the exceptions envisaged by Article 6 of the Convention must remain within reasonable limits, and the authorization of up to four overtime hours a day without other guarantees, such as for example a monthly or an annual limit, considerably exceeds the exceptions authorized by the Convention and is resolutely contrary to the spirit in which it was drawn up. The Government states in its report that it envisages giving effect to the Committee's comments by taking the necessary measures to determine, after consultation with the representative organizations of employers and workers, the circumstances in which overtime hours may be worked and the maximum number of overtime hours which may be authorized in each case. The Committee hopes that such measures will be adopted in the near future and requests the Government to keep the ILO informed of any progress achieved in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

1. The Committee notes the information provided under Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention. It notes that in cases in which internal labour regulations are necessary for an enterprise or entity, it treats these aspects itself. The Committee wishes to point out that the permanent exceptions and temporary exemptions possible under this Article may only be granted through regulations made by public authority and cannot be left to the individual enterprise or entity.

2. Article 6, paragraph 2. The Committee notes from the Government's report that additional working hours beyond the normal working hours are voluntary and paid at an additional rate of 50 per cent. In its previous comment, the Committee had already noted that section 122 of the Labour Code authorized up to four additional hours of work per day. It had pointed out that the employment of a worker for four additional hours per day without any restriction (such as a monthly or annual limit) greatly exceeded the exceptions authorized by the Convention and was resolutely contrary to the spirit in which the Convention was drawn up.

The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to determine, after consultation with the organizations of employers and workers concerned, the circumstances in which use may be made of additional hours and the maximum reasonable number of additional hours which may be authorized in each instance. It also requests the Government to supply information on the application of this provision of the Convention in the public sector.

The Committee notes from the Government's last report that the Ministry of Labour and Social Security is already initiating punctual reforms in which this aspect is included. It hopes that these reforms will soon be brought under way and asks to be informed about any progress made.

3. The Committee notes the information in the Government's report concerning Article 8.

4. Article 14. The Committee has noted the measures taken because of the crisis in the generation of electric energy, and that in the meantime the state of emergency and the rationing of electric energy have been suspended. It wishes to be informed whether the conditions concerning the adjustment of working hours have also been repealed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its report. It notes in particular the Government's indication that section 122 of the Labour Code establishes the cases in which the working day may be extended.

The Committee draws the Government's attention to the fact that it has addressed the above provision in its comments on Convention No. 1, and asks the Government to refer to them.

Furthermore, the Committee noted in 1981 the adoption of Government Decision No. 6-80 of 9 May 1980 containing regulations which it considered to be in conformity with the provisions of the Convention.

The Committee therefore asks the Government to clarify the legal situation by indicating to what extent Government Decision No. 6-80, and section 122 of the Labour Code apply to the workers covered by the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its first report. It requests the Government to supply additional information on the following points:

Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Please supply full particulars on the regulations adopted under the terms of this provision of the Convention in both the private and public sectors.

Article 6, paragraph 2. The Committee notes that section 122 of the Labour Code authorises up to four additional hours of work per day. It points out that the employment of a worker for four additional hours per day without any restriction (such as a monthly or annual limit) greatly exceeds the exceptions authorised by the Convention and is resolutely contrary to the spirit in which the Convention was drawn up.

The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to determine, after consultation with the organisations of employers and workers concerned, the circumstances in which use may be made of additional hours and the maximum reasonable number of additional hours which may be authorised in each instance. The Committee also requests the Government to supply information on the application of this provision of the Convention in the public sector.

Article 8, paragraph 1(a) and (b). Please supply information on the manner in which effect is given to these provisions of the Convention in the public and private sectors.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its first report. It requests the Government to supply additional information on the following points:

Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Please supply full particulars on the regulations adopted under the terms of this provision of the Convention in both the private and public sectors.

Article 6, paragraph 2. The Committee notes that section 122 of the Labour Code authorises up to four additional hours of work per day. It points out that the employment of a worker for four additional hours per day without any restriction (such as a monthly or annual limit) greatly exceeds the exceptions authorised by the Convention and is resolutely contrary to the spirit in which the Convention was drawn up.

The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to determine, after consultation with the organisations of employers and workers concerned, the circumstances in which use may be made of additional hours and the maximum reasonable number of additional hours which may be authorised in each instance. The Committee also requests the Government to supply information on the application of this provision of the Convention in the public sector.

Article 8, paragraph 1(a) and (b). Please supply information on the manner in which effect is given to these provisions of the Convention in the public and private sectors.