Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified occupational safety and health (OSH) Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 115 (radiation protection), 136 (benzene), 139 (occupational cancer) and 155 (OSH) together.

General provisions

Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in response to its previous request regarding Article 19 of the Convention.

Application of the Convention in practice. Further to its previous comment, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government that most non-fatal workplace accidents continue to occur in the agricultural sector, specifically in the sugarcane fields. It also reports that, in recent years, there has been a significant reduction in the number of accidents, attributed to the reduced production of sugar and the emphasis placed by industry management on maintaining safe and healthy workplaces. In this respect, the Committee notes that there were 20 fatal accidents (and 625 non-fatal accidents) in 2022, 20 fatal accidents (and 577 non-fatal accidents) in 2023, and 19 fatal accidents in the first six months of 2024. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on measures taken or envisaged to address the high number of accidents in the agricultural sector. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country in practice including the number and nature of the contraventions reported and the number, nature and cause of occupational accidents and cases of occupational diseases reported.

Articles 4, 7 and 15 of the Convention. Periodic review of the national policy. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the National Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH), which is appointed annually and operates in accordance with the provisions outlined in section 10(7)(a) and (b) of the OSH Act of 1997. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s indication that the National OSH Policy was reviewed and revised in 2018 and subsequently re-launched in 2019, with support from the ILO Office for the Caribbean. The policy identifies seven key policy outcomes, including decreasing accidents and diseases related to OSH and encouraging a workplace health and safety culture, and states that it will be revised every five years or as deemed necessary. The Government further indicates that the OSH policy is scheduled for review and that it has requested ILO assistance in this process. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that it is currently working on a review of the OSH Act, and it notes the activities of the NACOSH reflected in the Council’s annual report. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the review of the national OSH policy and the consultations held in this regard, as well as on the policy’s implementation. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the review of the OSH Act and the consultations held in this respect.

Article 6. Functions and responsibilities. In response to its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to the OSH Act, which delineates the roles and responsibilities of employers (sections 45 to 47), supervisors (section 48), workers (section 49), occupiers and owners of industrial establishments (sections 50 to 53), suppliers (section 54) and directors and officers of corporate bodies (section 55). The Committee further notes the Government’s indication that the OSH Policy specifies responsibilities of these and other agents to ensure coordinated action among all agencies involved in OSH. These entities, which include the Ministry of Social Protection, the NACOSH, the Ministry of Public Health, the National Insurance Scheme, the Guyana National Bureau of Standards (GNBS), the Guyana Fire Service (GFS), the University of Guyana, and the Guyana Civil Aviation Authority, are expected to collaborate to improve working conditions and the workplace environment throughout the country. The Committee notes this information, which responds to its previous request.

Article 9. Adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Labour and OSH Departments are currently separate departments within the Ministry of Labour, and that a combined total of 8,000 inspections were undertaken from 2021 to 2023. The Government also indicates that efforts are being taken to hire both Labour and OSH officers across the country. The Committee further notes the findings of the 2023 Report of the Auditor General on a review of the Ministry of Labour's OSH inspection process, which highlighted shortcomings within the OSH Department, such as: ineffective enforcement of workplace registration and insufficient planning and resource utilization for inspections; lack of technical skills among inspectors, impacting the effectiveness of inspections; absence of a comprehensive database of workplaces, hindering targeted inspections and accurate tracking of the total number of inspections conducted; inadequate documentation and monitoring of inspection findings, resulting in insufficient follow-up on corrective actions; and failure to impose fines and penalties for violations, further weakening enforcement efforts. With reference to its comments adopted in 2024 concerning the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81) and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), the Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the functioning of inspection services in relation to OSH, including measures to address the issues highlighted in the Report of the Auditor General of 2023.

Article 12. Obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that no specific measures have been undertaken through policy or law to fulfil the requirements under Article 12. The Committee also notes the Government’s reference to the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act, pursuant to which the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board manages a registration mechanism for pesticides and toxic chemicals manufactured in the country or imported. The Committee further notes that the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Regulations set forth requirements for the labelling and safe use of these substances. In addition, the Committee notes that section 65(1) of the OSH Act establishes that a person who supplies, manufactures or designs a workplace article that emits hazardous physical agents must ensure prescribed safety information on its hazards and proper use is readily available. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to prescribe the obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment and any substances for occupational use, so that such items do not entail dangers for the safety and health of those using them correctly in accordance with Article 12(a). It requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken to implement Article 12(b) of the Convention, regarding the obligation to make available information, as well as Article 12(c).

Article 13. Protection from undue consequences. The Committee previously noted that pursuant to section 56 of the OSH Act, workers are entitled to refuse to work when they have reasonable basis for believing that a hazardous situation exists and presents an imminent or serious danger to their safety and health, or that of a fellow worker, but that certain categories could be excluded from the application of section 56 by virtue of an order of the Minister (section 56(2)). In this respect, the Committee notes the Government’s response that that no ministerial decrees or orders were issued by virtue of section 56(2) of the OSH Act, and that currently, the OSH Act applies uniformly across all industrial establishments. The Government also indicates that awareness sessions are conducted regularly with workers and joint workplace safety and health committees to educate them on their rights, obligations, and the importance of safe work practices. The Committee notes this information, which replies to its previous request.

Article 17. Collaboration between two or more undertakings engaging in activities simultaneously at one workplace. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that collaboration among employers is ongoing, particularly in the oil and gas and construction sectors. Employers are also encouraged to establish joint workplace safety and health committees or designate safety and health representatives, depending on the size of their operations. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures adopted or envisaged to ensure that whenever two or more undertakings engage in activities simultaneously at one workplace, they collaborate in applying the requirements of this Convention.

Article 20. Cooperation at the level of the undertaking. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the OSH Act, which stipulates that workplaces employing fewer than 20 but more than five persons must have a designated safety and health representative. The Government also indicates that a draft Joint Workplace Safety and Health Regulation has been developed to streamline the operations of joint workplace safety and health committees and representatives and is awaiting parliamentary approval. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the adoption of the Joint Workplace Safety and Health Regulation.

Protection from specific risks

Radiation Protection Convention, 1960 (No. 115)

Application in practice. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application of this Convention in practice, including statistics on the number of workers exposed to ionizing radiation and any other violations detected during labour inspection visits and their follow-up.

Article 7(1)(b) and (2). Exposure limits for young workers between 16 and 18 years of age. The Committee refers to its comments under the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) where it noted that the Government is considering revising its list of hazardous work which is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of children. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted, including in the framework of this revision, to fix appropriate levels of ionizing radiation for young workers aged between 16 and 18 years who are directly engaged in radiation work and to forbid work involving ionizing radiations to workers under the age of 16.

Article 11. Appropriate monitoring of workers and workplaces. The Committee notes that, under section 8 of the Radiation Safety and Security Act, one of the Radiation Safety and Security Board’s functions is to monitor and assess activities and practices to verify compliance with the Act and with the terms and conditions of licenses. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure the monitoring of workplaces and the safety of workers, including the cooperation efforts in this regard between the Radiation Safety and Security Board and the labour inspectorate.

Article 14. Employment involving exposure to ionizing radiation contrary to medical advice. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure that workers are not employed or engaged in work liable to expose them to ionizing radiations contrary to qualified medical advice.

Benzene Convention, 1971 (No. 136)

Article 2 of the Convention. Replacement of benzene or of products containing it. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures adopted, including in the context of the ongoing legislative review, to ensure the use of harmless or less harmful substitute products, wherever available, instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 5. Preventive occupational hygiene and technical measures. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure the adoption and implementation of preventive technical and occupational hygiene measures to ensure the effective protection of workers exposed to benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 6. Measures to prevent the escape of vapour, ceiling values allowed and methods of measurement. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures adopted or envisaged to bring national law and practice into conformity with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention.

Article 7. Enclosed systems. Removal of benzene vapour. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure that work processes involving the use of benzene or of products containing benzene are carried out in an enclosed system, as far as practicable. It also requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure that, where it is not practicable for the work processes to be carried out in an enclosed system, places of work in which benzene or products containing benzene are used are equipped with effective means to ensure the removal of benzene vapour to the extent necessary for the protection of the health of the workers.

Article 8. Personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to bring national law and practice into conformity with the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention.

Articles 9. Medical examinations. The Committee notes that section 47(1)(i) and (j) of the OSH Act requires employers to provide for medical examinations and safety-related tests for workers as prescribed, and stipulates that only those workers who have undergone such prescribed examinations, tests, or X-rays, and have been deemed physically fit, may be permitted to work in the workplace. Additionally, the Committee notes that the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act authorizes the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board to request periodic medical examinations of workers as specified by regulations, and mandates medical examiners or practitioners to report quarterly on cases of poisoning by pesticides and toxic chemicals (sections 31(2)(c) and 31(3)). However, the Committee notes there are no specific provisions addressing the obligation for pre-employment medical examinations for workers who are to be employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene or to products containing benzene and their periodic re-examinations. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that these workers shall undergo a thorough pre-employment medical examination for fitness for employment and periodic re-examinations.

Article 11(1) and (2). Prohibition of the employment of young persons under 18 years of age in work processes involving exposure to benzene or products containing benzene, except in the context of education or training. Prohibition of the employment of nursing women. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken, including within the context of the ongoing legislative review and the revision of its list of hazardous work which is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of children, to ensure that : (a) nursing mothers shall not be employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene or products containing benzene; and (b) young persons under 18 years of age shall not be employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene or products containing benzene, unless they are young persons undergoing education or training who are under adequate technical and medical supervision.

Article 12. Clearly visible danger symbols on any container holding benzene or products containing benzene. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure that the word “Benzene” and the necessary danger symbols are clearly visible on any container holding benzene or products containing benzene.

Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139)

Application of the Convention in practice. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application of the Convention in practice, namely on the number of occupational diseases reported and workers exposed to carcinogenic or mutagenic substances.

Article 1(1) and (2) of the Convention. List of prohibited or restricted carcinogenic substances or agents. Exemptions from prohibition. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board (PTCCB), under the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act and its Regulations, has an established mechanism for assessing carcinogenicity and safeguarding human health and the environment. The Government also indicates that the PTCCB oversees a comprehensive registration system for all pesticides and toxic chemicals but indicates that these registers are not classified by carcinogenicity. The Committee takes due note of the Government's indication that the list of prohibited and restricted substances was updated in 2022 and that the PTCCB has not granted any exemptions for substances prohibited under the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act and its subsidiary Regulations. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure the implementation of a mechanism to periodically determine the carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure shall be prohibited or made subject to authorization or control.

Article 2(1) and (2). Replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents. Number of workers exposed. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it is endeavouring to incorporate provisions concerning the obligation to substitute carcinogenic substances and agents into the new OSH regulatory framework under development. The Government also indicates that data on the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents is currently unavailable, though systems will be developed to collect this information. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure that the draft Regulations on the Safe Use of Chemicals at Work contain provisions providing for the obligation to substitute carcinogenic substances and agents whenever possible, and to provide information on any progress made in this regard. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure the elaboration of statistics on number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents.

Article 5. Medical examinations. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, to date, the PTCCB Board has not requested any medical examinations of workers from employers. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the measures adopted to ensure that medical examinations during the period of employment and thereafter are conducted for all workers exposed to carcinogenic substances and agents, in order to evaluate their exposure and supervise their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified occupational safety and health (OSH) Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 115 (radiation protection), 136 (benzene) and 139 (occupational cancer) together.

Protection from specific risks

Radiation Protection Convention, 1960 (No. 115)

Articles 1, 3(1), 6 and 8 of the Convention. Legislation. Maximum permissible doses. Consultation of the social partners. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the adoption of the Radiation Safety and Security Act (No. 10 of 2023). The Committee notes the new Act establishes the Radiation Safety and Security Board for the purpose of exercising regulatory control over the peaceful uses of ionizing radiation and contains obligations for licensees. Section 42 of the Act authorizes the Board, in consultation with the Minister, to enact regulations aimed at protecting individuals from injury due to ionizing radiation exposure, including setting dose limits that must not be exceeded during activities under regulatory oversight. Additionally, section 42(2) states that dose limits should align with recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure effective protection of workers, as it relates to their health and safety, against ionizing radiations. It requests the Government to adopt the necessary regulations in order to ensure that maximum permissible doses or amounts are determined without delay, for both workers directly engaged in radiation work and for those who remain or pass where they may be exposed to ionizing radiations. Finally, it requests the Government to provide information on the consultations held with representatives of employers and workers on the Radiation Safety and Security Act and any subsequent regulations.

Article 12. Medical examinations. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures in order to ensure medical examinations are prescribed and provided in practice to all workers directly engaged in radiation work, including examinations prior to or shortly after taking up such work, and their subsequent examination at appropriate intervals.

Benzene Convention, 1971 (No. 136)

Legislation. The Committee notes that pursuant to the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act, the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board (PTCCB) manages a registration mechanism for pesticides and toxic chemicals manufactured in the country or that are imported. The Committee notes that the Board’s list of prohibited pesticides and toxic chemicals includes several benzene derivatives. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a review of the OSH Act and existing regulations is currently under way, with the aim of establishing a comprehensive legislative and regulatory framework that addresses all OSH-related matters. The Committee further notes the Government’s request for technical assistance to align national legislation and practices with the Convention’s requirements. The Committee takes note of this request for technical assistance and expresses the hope that this assistance will be provided in the near future. It also requests the Government to take measures to ensure that the reviewed regulatory framework gives full effect to the Convention and that the Committee’s comments on legislative matters are taken into account in the context of the review.

Article 4 of the Convention. Prohibition of the use of benzene in certain work processes. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the monitoring of benzene and substances containing benzene is ensured by the PTCCB. It further notes the Government’s indication regarding the use of benzene and its derivatives permitted in the country, and an indication of the products monitored by the PTCCB in that respect. The Committee requests the Government to take all the necessary steps, including in the context of the ongoing legislative review, to ensure that the use of benzene and products containing benzene is prohibited in certain work processes and that this prohibition includes at least the use of benzene and products containing benzene as a solvent or diluent, except where the process is carried out in an enclosed system or where there are other equally safe methods of work. It requests the Government to provide information on any developments in this regard.

Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139)

Legislation. Further to its previous comment and noting the ongoing legislative review, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the reviewed regulatory framework gives full effect to the Convention and that the Committee’s comments on legislative matters are taken into account in the context of the review.

Article 3 of the Convention. Exposure limits and protective measures. Records of exposure of workers at risk. In response to its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that employers are mandated to ensure that safety data sheets and labels are accessible to all employees and that all relevant personal protective equipment, as specified on the product labels, is provided to workers handling these substances. The Committee once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to establish an appropriate system of records at the national level. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken, including in the context of the legislative review, to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Legislation. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that the final draft of the Regulations on safe use of chemicals at work have been approved by the National Tripartite Committee and are currently being reviewed by the Attorney General’s Chambers. The Regulations will then be presented to Cabinet for approval and then submitted to Parliament for adoption. Noting that the adoption of these Regulations has been pending for many years, the Committee urges the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work are adopted without delay in order to ensure the application of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to provide a copy of the Regulations once adopted.

Article 1(1) and (2) of the Convention. List of prohibited or restricted carcinogenic substances or agents. Exemptions from prohibition. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that, pursuant to section 59 of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act of 1997, the use or intended use of chemical, biological or physical agents may be prohibited, limited or restricted or made subject to conditions, if their use, in the opinion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority, is likely to endanger the health of workers. The Committee notes that the use of 25 chemicals is prohibited or restricted by Schedule 1 of the Regulations made under the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act, including six substances (esters, chlordane, chlordimeform, chlorobenzilate, mirex and pentachlorophenol) considered to have carcinogenic effects, all of which are prohibited. The Committee also notes that the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board (the Board) of Guyana published an updated list of banned and restricted chemicals, which was adopted in 2018. The Committee further observes that there is no information on the existence of a mechanism to periodically determine the carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure shall be prohibited or made subject to authorization or control. In addition, it notes that the Government’s report does not contain up-to-date information on the exemptions from prohibition, which may only be granted by issuing a certificate specifying in each case the conditions to be met. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the mechanism to periodically determine the carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure shall be prohibited or made subject to authorization or control. It also requests the Government to provide the up-to-date list of carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited. In addition, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether any exemptions from prohibition have been granted by the issuance of a certificate that specifies, for each case, the conditions to be met.

Article 2(1) and (2). Replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents. Number of workers exposed. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that the National Agriculture Research Institute gave advice to importers to import chemicals that are not carcinogenic, and that farmers and their organizations have been educated on the need to use less carcinogenic chemicals. The Committee notes that the Pesticides and Toxic Chemical Control Act and its Regulations do not contain any provisions providing for the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents by non-carcinogenic or less harmful substances and agents. The Committee also notes the absence of information on the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the draft Regulations on the Safe Use of Chemicals at Work contain provisions providing for the obligation to substitute carcinogenic substances and agents whenever possible, and to provide information on any progress made in this regard. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents.

Article 3. Exposure limits and protective measures. Records of exposure of workers at risk. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that section 31(1) and (2)(a) and (b) of the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act provides that the Board may request the employer to remove the risk of body injury, exhibit notice at the workplace and take special precautions. Moreover, Part X of the Pesticides and Toxic Chemical Control Regulations provides for the protection of workers exposed to pesticides. The Committee observes however that, except for the above-mentioned lists of prohibited chemicals, there are no provisions addressing the risk of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents. In addition, in its previous comments, the Committee noted that section 61 of the OSH Act 1997 does not give full effect to Article 3 of the Convention, as it only provides for the obligation of the employer to establish and maintain an inventory of all hazardous chemicals and physical agents present at the workplace. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents by specifying the conditions under which reasonable exposure to carcinogenic substances may be authorized, including permitted exposure limits and specific protective measures, and to provide any policy and/or regulation in this regard. It also once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to establish an appropriate system of records at the national level to evaluate the different aspects of occupational cancer.

Article 5. Medical examinations. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that, in accordance with to section 31(2)(c) of the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act, the Board may request the employer to provide periodical medical examinations of workers as prescribed by regulations. The Committee requests the Government to clarify whether this medical examination is a general obligation of employers or if it occurs only upon the request of the Board, and to indicate whether any regulations providing for periodical medical examinations have been adopted. The Committee also requests the Government to indicate whether there is any regulation providing for post-employment medical examinations of workers.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2021, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2020, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments initially made in 2016.

Repetition

The Committee notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

Articles 4, 7 and 15 of the Convention. Periodic review of the national policy. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 10(7)(a) and (b) of the OSH Act, one of the functions of the National Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) is to advise on the formulation of a national policy on OSH. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the work of the NACOSH and on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure that the national policy on OSH is reviewed in accordance with the assessment of the OSH situation as provided for in Article 7 of the Convention. It also requests the Government to submit a copy of the relevant national OSH documents, including the national policy.

Article 5. Spheres of action of the national policy. The Committee notes that while the Government indicates that the policy covers all of the spheres enumerated in the Article, no further information is provided on the manner in which these spheres are integrated into the policy. The Committee requests the Government to provide details on the manner in which the national policy takes into account the main spheres of action enumerated in this Article of the Convention.

Article 6. Functions and responsibilities. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to section 6(1), (2) and (3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act No. 32 of 1997 (OSH Act) which concerns the “register of industrial establishments and particulars thereof”, but does not address the functions and responsibilities of public authorities, employers, workers and other interested parties in respect to OSH and the working environment, as required by Article 6 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to give full effect to this Article of the Convention.

Article 9. Adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Labour Occupational Safety and Health Department (hereinafter the “Department”), which is part of the Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security, is responsible for the enforcement of OSH laws and regulations. However, the Committee notes from the annual reports of the Department, for the 2008–12 period, that it has seen significant cuts to the number of staff members and resources which has negatively impacted the number of inspections conducted in workplaces, with 1,117 inspections conducted in 2012 compared to 3,029 in 2011. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to address the decrease in the number of inspections, and to ensure that OSH laws and regulations are effectively enforced.

Article 12. Obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use. The Committee notes that the OSH Act requires employers, suppliers, manufacturers and importers to maintain and keep proper records and documentation, which include manufacturers’ manuals and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). However, the Committee notes that the Government’s report did not provide information on the measures taken to give effect to the specific requirements of paragraphs (a)–(c) of Article 12 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged, in law and in practice, to give full effect to the requirements of this Article of the Convention.

Article 13. Protection from undue consequences. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 56 of the OSH Act, workers are entitled to refuse to work when they have reasonable basis for believing that a hazardous situation exists and presents an imminent or serious danger to their safety and health, or that of a fellow worker. However, the Committee notes that certain categories of workers (for example a person employed in the operation of a laundry or food service within a hospital or a nursing home) may be excluded from the application of section 56 by virtue of an order of the Minister. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any ministerial decrees or orders, issued by virtue of section 56(2) of the OSH Act, and to provide information on any other measures taken in practice to ensure the application of Article 13 of the Convention.

Article 17. Collaboration between two or more undertakings engaging in activities simultaneously at one workplace. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that while no legislative provisions giving effect to this Article exist, it is common practice for employers to collaborate, where necessary, to ensure the safety and health of all employees. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on measures taken in order to ensure that effect is given to this Article of the Convention.

Article 19. Rights and duties of workers and their representatives. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the rights and duties enumerated in this Article are provided for in the OSH Act, and that section 23(1) of the Act requires the establishment of joint workplace safety and health committees in certain undertakings. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the manner in which effect is given, in law and in practice, to each paragraph of this Article of the Convention, including references to specific provisions of the OSH Act.

Article 20. Cooperation at the level of the undertaking. The Committee notes that, pursuant to section 23 of the OSH Act, a joint workplace safety and health committee must be established in workplaces where 20 or more workers are regularly employed, where the employer has received an order under section 59, or in workplaces other than a construction site where fewer than 20 workers are regularly employed and with respect to which a regulation concerning critical substances applies. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure effective cooperation between management and workers and their representatives within the undertaking, particularly in undertakings not required by the OSH Act to establish safety and health committees.

Application in practice. The Committee notes the reports of the Department for the 2008–12 period, and the reports for October and December 2013, annexed to the Government’s report. It notes the indication that 738 industrial accidents and 12 workplace fatalities were recorded in 2012 and that 77 of the 98 workplace accidents recorded in October and December 2013 occurred in the agricultural sector. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken or envisaged to address the high number of accidents in the agricultural sector. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country in practice and, where such statistics exist, information on the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of the contraventions reported, the number, nature and cause of the accidents and diseases reported, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

General observation of 2015. The Committee would like to draw the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2015 under this Convention, including the request for information contained in paragraph 30 thereof.

The Committee notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes with concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes that the Government’s report does not provide any information on the application of the Convention, either in law or in practice. The Committee reiterates that current national laws and regulations are too general to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention and that specific measures should be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the provisions of the Convention are applied in law and in practice. The Committee would also like to inform the Government that the Office is available to provide relevant technical assistance to assist in its efforts to bring national law and practice into conformity with this Convention.

The Committee expects that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee takes note of the first report provided by the Government on the application of the Convention.

Articles 4, 7 and 15 of the Convention. Periodic review of the national policy. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 10(7)(a) and (b) of the OSH Act, one of the functions of the National Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) is to advise on the formulation of a national policy on OSH. It also notes the indication that the national policy is reviewed on a periodical basis by means of a multipartite workshop involving a number of key agencies. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the work of the NACOSH and on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure that the national policy on OSH is reviewed in accordance with the assessment of the OSH situation as provided for in Article 7 of the Convention. It also requests the Government to submit a copy of the relevant national OSH documents, including the national policy.

Article 5. Spheres of action of the national policy. The Committee notes that while the Government indicates that the policy covers all of the spheres enumerated in the Article, no further information is provided on the manner in which these spheres are integrated into the policy. The Committee requests the Government to provide details on the manner in which the national policy takes into account the main spheres of action enumerated in this Article of the Convention.

Article 6. Functions and responsibilities. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to section 6(1), (2) and (3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act No. 32 of 1997 (OSH Act) which concerns the “register of industrial establishments and particulars thereof”, but does not address the functions and responsibilities of public authorities, employers, workers and other interested parties in respect to OSH and the working environment, as required by Article 6 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to give full effect to this Article of the Convention.

Article 9. Adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Labour Occupational Safety and Health Department (hereinafter the “Department”), which is part of the Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security, is responsible for the enforcement of OSH laws and regulations. However, the Committee notes from the annual reports of the Department, for the 2008–12 period, that it has seen significant cuts to the number of staff members and resources which has negatively impacted the number of inspections conducted in workplaces, with 1,117 inspections conducted in 2012 compared to 3,029 in 2011. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to address the decrease in the number of inspections, and to ensure that OSH laws and regulations are effectively enforced.

Article 12. Obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use. The Committee notes that the OSH Act requires employers, suppliers, manufacturers and importers to maintain and keep proper records and documentation, which include manufacturers’ manuals and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). However, the Committee notes that the Government’s report did not provide information on the measures taken to give effect to the specific requirements of paragraphs (a)–(c) of Article 12 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged, in law and in practice, to give full effect to the requirements of this Article of the Convention.

Article 13. Protection from undue consequences. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 56 of the OSH Act, workers are entitled to refuse to work when they have reasonable basis for believing that a hazardous situation exists and presents an imminent or serious danger to their safety and health, or that of a fellow worker. However, the Committee notes that certain categories of workers (for example a person employed in the operation of a laundry or food service within a hospital or a nursing home) may be excluded from the application of section 56 by virtue of an order of the Minister. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any ministerial decrees or orders, issued by virtue of section 56(2) of the OSH Act, and to provide information on any other measures taken in practice to ensure the application of Article 13 of the Convention.

Article 17. Collaboration between two or more undertakings engaging in activities simultaneously at one workplace. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that while no legislative provisions giving effect to this Article exist, it is common practice for employers to collaborate, where necessary, to ensure the safety and health of all employees. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on measures taken in order to ensure that effect is given to this Article of the Convention.

Article 19. Rights and duties of workers and their representatives. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the rights and duties enumerated in this Article are provided for in the OSH Act, and that section 23(1) of the Act requires the establishment of joint workplace safety and health committees in certain undertakings. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the manner in which effect is given, in law and in practice, to each paragraph of this Article of the Convention, including references to specific provisions of the OSH Act.

Article 20. Cooperation at the level of the undertaking. The Committee notes that, pursuant to section 23 of the OSH Act, a joint workplace safety and health committee must be established in workplaces where 20 or more workers are regularly employed, where the employer has received an order under section 59, or in workplaces other than a construction site where fewer than 20 workers are regularly employed and with respect to which a regulation concerning critical substances applies. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure effective cooperation between management and workers and their representatives within the undertaking, particularly in undertakings not required by the OSH Act to establish safety and health committees.

Application in practice. The Committee notes the reports of the Department for the 2008–12 period, and the reports for October and December 2013, annexed to the Government’s report. It notes the indication that 738 industrial accidents and 12 workplace fatalities were recorded in 2012 and that 77 of the 98 workplace accidents recorded in October and December 2013 occurred in the agricultural sector. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken or envisaged to address the high number of accidents in the agricultural sector. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country in practice and, where such statistics exist, information on the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of the contraventions reported, the number, nature and cause of the accidents and diseases reported, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It expresses concern in this respect. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes that the Government’s report does not provide any information on the application of the Convention, either in law or in practice. The Committee reiterates that current national laws and regulations are too general to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention and that specific measures should be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the provisions of the Convention are applied in law and in practice. The Committee would also like to inform the Government that the Office is available to provide relevant technical assistance to assist in its efforts to bring national law and practice into conformity with this Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It expresses deep concern in this respect. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

General observation of 2015. The Committee would like to draw the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2015 under this Convention, including the request for information contained in paragraph 30 thereof.

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It expresses deep concern in this respect. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee takes note of the first report provided by the Government on the application of the Convention.

Legislation. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act No. 32 of 1997 (OSH Act) gives effect to a number of provisions of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on legislative measures undertaken with regard to the application of the Convention.

Articles 4, 7 and 15 of the Convention. Periodic review of the national policy. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 10(7)(a) and (b) of the OSH Act, one of the functions of the National Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) is to advise on the formulation of a national policy on OSH. It also notes the indication that the national policy is reviewed on a periodical basis by means of a multipartite workshop involving a number of key agencies. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the work of the NACOSH and on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure that the national policy on OSH is reviewed in accordance with the assessment of the OSH situation as provided for in Article 7 of the Convention. It also requests the Government to submit a copy of the relevant national OSH documents, including the national policy.

Article 5. Spheres of action of the national policy. The Committee notes that while the Government indicates that the policy covers all of the spheres enumerated in the Article, no further information is provided on the manner in which these spheres are integrated into the policy. The Committee requests the Government to provide details on the manner in which the national policy takes into account the main spheres of action enumerated in this Article of the Convention.

Article 6. Functions and responsibilities. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to section 6(1), (2) and (3) of the OSH Act which concerns the “register of industrial establishments and particulars thereof”, but does not address the functions and responsibilities of public authorities, employers, workers and other interested parties in respect to OSH and the working environment, as required by Article 6 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to give full effect to this Article of the Convention.

Article 9. Adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Labour Occupational Safety and Health Department (hereinafter the “Department”), which is part of the Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security, is responsible for the enforcement of OSH laws and regulations. However, the Committee notes from the annual reports of the Department, for the 2008–12 period, that it has seen significant cuts to the number of staff members and resources which has negatively impacted the number of inspections conducted in workplaces, with 1,117 inspections conducted in 2012 compared to 3,029 in 2011. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to address the decrease in the number of inspections, and to ensure that OSH laws and regulations are effectively enforced.

Article 12. Obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use. The Committee notes that the OSH Act requires employers, suppliers, manufacturers and importers to maintain and keep proper records and documentation, which include manufacturers’ manuals and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). However, the Committee notes that the Government’s report did not provide information on the measures taken to give effect to the specific requirements of paragraphs (a)–(c) of Article 12 of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged, in law and in practice, to give full effect to the requirements of this Article of the Convention.

Article 13. Protection from undue consequences. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 56 of the OSH Act, workers are entitled to refuse to work when they have reasonable basis for believing that a hazardous situation exists and presents an imminent or serious danger to their safety and health, or that of a fellow worker. However, the Committee notes that certain categories of workers (for example a person employed in the operation of a laundry or food service within a hospital or a nursing home) may be excluded from the application of section 56 by virtue of an order of the Minister. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any ministerial decrees or orders, issued by virtue of section 56(2) of the OSH Act, and to provide information on any other measures taken in practice to ensure the application of Article 13 of the Convention.

Article 17. Collaboration between two or more undertakings engaging in activities simultaneously at one workplace. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that while no legislative provisions giving effect to this Article exist, it is common practice for employers to collaborate, where necessary, to ensure the safety and health of all employees. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on measures taken in order to ensure that effect is given to this Article of the Convention.

Article 19. Rights and duties of workers and their representatives. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the rights and duties enumerated in this Article are provided for in the OSH Act, and that section 23(1) of the Act requires the establishment of joint workplace safety and health committees in certain undertakings. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the manner in which effect is given, in law and in practice, to each paragraph of this Article of the Convention, including references to specific provisions of the OSH Act.

Article 20. Cooperation at the level of the undertaking. The Committee notes that, pursuant to section 23 of the OSH Act, a joint workplace safety and health committee must be established in workplaces where 20 or more workers are regularly employed, where the employer has received an order under section 59, or in workplaces other than a construction site where fewer than 20 workers are regularly employed and with respect to which a regulation concerning critical substances applies. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken, in law and in practice, to ensure effective cooperation between management and workers and their representatives within the undertaking, particularly in undertakings not required by the OSH Act to establish safety and health committees.

Application of the Convention in practice. The Committee notes the reports of the Department for the 2008–12 period, and the reports for October and December 2013, annexed to the Government’s report. It notes the indication that 738 industrial accidents and 12 workplace fatalities were recorded in 2012 and that 77 of the 98 workplace accidents recorded in October and December 2013 occurred in the agricultural sector. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken or envisaged to address the high number of accidents in the agricultural sector. It also requests the Government to provide further information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country in practice and, where such statistics exist, information on the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of the contraventions reported, the number, nature and cause of the accidents and diseases reported, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary measures in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comment, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comment, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

The Committee hopes that the Government will do its utmost to take the necessary measures in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not provide any information on the application of the Convention, either in law or in practice. The Committee reiterates that current national laws and regulations are too general to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention and that specific measures should be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the provisions of the Convention are applied in law and in practice. The Committee would also like to inform the Government that the Office is available to provide relevant technical assistance to assist in its efforts to bring national law and practice into conformity with this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that, with respect to hazardous chemicals, physical and biological agents that might endanger the health of workers, the authority shall issue an order to prohibit, limit or restrict the use of such agents at a workplace. The Committee notes the detailed draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which were attached to the Government’s report. It notes that Annex 1 provides a list of chemicals that are prohibited and that occupational exposure limits are provided in Annex 2, which refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee hopes that these regulations will be adopted in the near future and asks the Government to provide information to the Office once the Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work are adopted, and hopes that they will ensure that the use of benzene and of products containing benzene is prohibited in certain work processes, and that occupational hygiene and technical measures are taken to ensure effective protection of workers exposed to benzene or to products containing benzene, in accordance with the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Article 3(1) of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that, with respect to hazardous chemicals, physical and biological agents that might endanger the health of workers, the authority shall issue an order to prohibit, limit or restrict the use of such agents at a workplace. The Committee notes the detailed draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which were attached to the Government’s report. It notes that Annex 1 provides a list of chemicals that are prohibited and that occupational exposure limits are provided in Annex 2, which refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee hopes that these regulations will be adopted in the near future and asks the Government to provide information to the Office once the Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work are adopted, and hopes that they will ensure that the use of benzene and of products containing benzene is prohibited in certain work processes, and that occupational hygiene and technical measures are taken to ensure effective protection of workers exposed to benzene or to products containing benzene, in accordance with the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

1. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that the Ministry may adopt regulations to further regulate occupational safety and health issues. It notes the detailed draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which was attached to the Government’s report, but also notes that this draft text does not contain any rules with respect to ionizing radiation. The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken or envisaged to ensure that workers are protected against ionizing radiation at work, particularly through issuing regulations under section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

2. Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. With respect to exposure limits to chemical substances and agents, the Committee notes that Annex 2 in the proposed regulations refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee takes this opportunity to refer the Government to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention, in which the Committee refers to the exposure limits on ionizing radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), No. 60 (1990), according to which the permissible level of exposure to ionizing radiation for workers engaged in radiation work is recommended to be 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, but not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on measures taken or envisaged to give effect to the Convention, taking due account of the recommendations of the ICRP referred to in the Committee’s general observation of 1992 under this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

1. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the attached documentation. It notes that section 75(1)(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act No. 32 of 1997) provides that, with respect to hazardous chemicals, physical and biological agents that might endanger the health of workers, the authority shall issue an order to prohibit, limit or restrict the use of such agents at a workplace. The Committee notes the detailed draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003, which were attached to the Government’s report. It notes that Annex 1 provides a list of chemicals that are prohibited and that occupational exposure limits are provided in Annex 2, which refers to the international standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee hopes that these regulations will be adopted in the near future and asks the Government to provide information to the Office once the Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work are adopted, and hopes that they will ensure that the use of benzene and of products containing benzene is prohibited in certain work processes, and that occupational hygiene and technical measures are taken to ensure effective protection of workers exposed to benzene or to products containing benzene, in accordance with the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report. It notes that draft Regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work of 31 January 2003 are currently being discussed. It notes the Government’s statement that these draft Regulations provide protection against occupational cancer and also that it refers to the international exposure limits standard established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. The Committee further notes that Chapter 3.6 of Annex 2 of the draft Regulations contains rules applicable to carcinogenicity and also notes the Government’s statement that these draft regulations will attempt to provide for medical examinations. The Committee hopes that these Regulations will be adopted in the near future, ensuring the application of the Convention, and that they will also ensure that medical examinations or biological or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report on measures taken to ensure the application of the Convention and to provide a copy of the Regulations, once they are adopted.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the adoption of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32 of 1997. It further notes the Government’s indication that consultants from the ILO are in the process of drafting the Regulations to the above Act. In the absence of the text of the 1997 Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32, it has not been possible for the Committee to examine the extent to which the above Act applies the provisions of the Convention. It therefore requests the Government to supply a copy of this Act, as well as of its implementing Regulations, as soon as they are adopted. The Committee hopes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32 of 1997, as well as the Regulations, will apply the provisions of this Convention and will, in particular, address the points raised by the Committee in its previous direct request which concerned the need to adopt provisions to ensure that there is:

–      consultation of representatives of employers and workers on the measures designed to give effect to the Convention (Article 1 of the Convention);

–      in the light of new knowledge, effective protection of workers against ionizing radiations and constant revision of the maximum permissible doses (Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2);

–      finally, the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiations (Article 10).

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

1. The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, has been adopted. It notes that this Act does not contain any specific provision which regulates the use of benzene and products containing benzene as provided for in the Convention. In this respect, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in the absence of measures giving effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Occupational Safety and Health Division of the Ministry of Labour has been requested to take legal initiative in order to bring the national legislation into conformity with the Convention. To this effect, the Committee would draw the Government’s attention once again to the following points.

Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to ensure that harmless or less harmful substitute products are used instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 4. Prohibition of the use of benzene or products containing benzene in certain processes.

Article 5. Occupational hygiene and technical measures to ensure effective protection of exposed workers.

Article 6, paragraph 1. Measures to prevent escape of benzene into the air or places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 2. Determination by the competent authority of the maximum permissible concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 3. Directions issued by the competent authority for measuring benzene in the air.

Article 7, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that, as far as practicable, processes involving the use of benzene are carried out in enclosed systems.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that workers are provided with appropriate means of personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin.

Articles 9 and 10. Measures to provide for medical examinations of workers employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 12. Measures to ensure that containers containing benzene are clearly marked with danger symbols.

The Committee reiterates its hope that the Government will take the necessary measures and will soon be in a position to report on progress made towards the adoption of measures required under the Convention to protect workers against hazards of poisoning arising from benzene.

Article 11. The Committee notes that section 41, paragraph 1, of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, provides for a general prohibition to employ children in any factory or in the business of a factory outside the factory. In this respect, it would point out that Article 11 calls for measures to prohibit the employment of young persons under 18 years of age, pregnant women and nursing mothers in work processes involving exposure to benzene. The Committee would therefore request the Government to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure that full effect is given to this Article of the Convention.

2. The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

1 The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s report. It notes the Government’s indication that the draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work, to be issued in application of section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, which contain preventive and proactive measures to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents is currently being drafted by an ILO consultant and discussed with the stakeholders. The Committee hopes that the above regulations will be adopted in the near future and that they will give effect to the Convention and in particular to the following Articles of the Convention.

1. Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted that pursuant to section 59 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, the use or intended use of chemical, biological or physical agents may be prohibited, limited or restricted or made subject to conditions, if their use, in the opinion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority, is likely to endanger the health of workers. However, the Government had indicated that neither a regulatory mechanism existed to prohibit or grant certifications specifying the conditions under which reasonable exposure of carcinogenic substances can be met, nor did the Occupational Safety and Health Department determine specific exposure levels for chemical substances proven to be carcinogenic. The Committee, recalling the provision of Article 1 of the Convention, had requested the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to establish a mechanism ensuring that the substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or subject to authorization and control are determined periodically, so that it is not left to the discretion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority to determine case by case whether a substance or agent endangers the health of the worker. In this respect, the Government merely indicates in its report that the country does not dispose of a formal list determining carcinogenic substances and agents, but that Guyana is guided by research done by the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). The Committee accordingly requests the Government to explain the framework in which such guidance takes place and to indicate the results of this guidance with regard to the application of this Article of the Convention.

2. Article 2. With regard to the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents to which workers may be exposed in the course of their work by non-carcinogenic or less harmful substances, the Committee notes the Government’s indication to the effect that the National Agriculture Research Institute (NARI) does the necessary research and that it gives advice to importers to import chemicals that are not carcinogenic. In addition, farmers and their organizations are educated on the need to use less carcinogenic chemicals. The Committee understands from the Government’s indications that the final decision concerning the possible substitution of carcinogenic substances and agents by non- or less harmful substances and agents is left to the discretion of the importers and users, like farmers. It accordingly hopes that the draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work will contain a regulation providing for the obligation to substitute carcinogenic substances and agents whenever possible. The Committee further hopes that the above regulations will also provide for the reduction of the number of workers as well as the duration and degree of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents to the minimum compatible with safety, in order to give full effect to this Article of the Convention.

3. Article 3. Referring to its previous comments and with regard to the establishment of permissible exposure limits in the framework of measures to be taken pursuant to Article 3 of the Convention to protect the workers against the risks of exposure, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that Guyana is guided by research done by the ACGIH. The Committee, noting that one of the main activities of the ACGIH is the establishment of threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents, requests the Government to indicate whether the threshold limits set forth by the ACGIH have a binding character and are in deed observed in the country. As to the establishment of an appropriate system of records of exposure of workers at risk, the Committee recalls again that the provision of section 61 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, does not give full effect to Article 3 of the Convention, since it obliges only the employer to establish and maintain an inventory of all hazardous chemicals and physical agents present at the workplace. The Committee therefore draws the Government’s attention to Paragraph 15, subparagraphs 1 and 2, of the Occupational Cancer Recommendation, 1974 (No. 147), recommending the establishment and maintenance of a system of records by the competent authority in association with individual employers. Moreover, it is indicated in the ILO publication Occupational cancer: Prevention and control, Occupational Safety and Health Series No. 39, that the purpose of a register containing the names of exposed persons, the result of technical monitoring, special medical examinations and laboratory tests performed on these workers is to permit the competent authority "to keep a close watch on the magnitude of the problem of occupational cancer in the country, the level of risk involved in the various types of exposure, the dose-response relationship and the effectiveness of preventive action. In this way, increased knowledge of the various aspects of occupational epidemiology can be gained". The Committee accordingly requests the Government to take the necessary measures to establish an appropriate system of records on national level in order to evaluate the different aspects of occupational cancer.

4. Article 5. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is currently no regulation providing for medical examinations of workers during the period of employment and thereafter, but that this requirement will be addressed in the proposed draft regulations on chemicals which is being drafted by an ILO consultant. The Committee therefore hopes that the above draft regulations will be adopted in the near future to ensure that workers will be provided with, inter alia, medical examinations during the period of employment and thereafter, to give effect to this Article of the Convention.

5. Article 6(a). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the existing legislation applicable, namely the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, will soon be supplemented by regulations in order to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed on every progress accomplished with regard to the elaboration of the regulations on chemicals.

2. The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes the Government’s report. It notes the Government’s indication that the draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work, to be issued in application of section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, which contain preventive and proactive measures to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents is currently being drafted by an ILO consultant and discussed with the stakeholders. The Committee hopes that the above regulations will be adopted in the near future and that they will give effect to the Convention and in particular to the following articles of the Convention.

1. Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted that pursuant to section 59 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, the use or intended use of chemical, biological or physical agents may be prohibited, limited or restricted or made subject to conditions, if their use, in the opinion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority, is likely to endanger the health of workers. However, the Government had indicated that neither a regulatory mechanism existed to prohibit or grant certifications specifying the conditions under which reasonable exposure of carcinogenic substances can be met, nor did the Occupational Safety and Health Department determine specific exposure levels for chemical substances proven to be carcinogenic. The Committee, recalling the provision of Article 1 of the Convention, had requested the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to establish a mechanism ensuring that the substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or subject to authorization and control are determined periodically, so that it is not left to the discretion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority to determine case by case whether a substance or agent endangers the health of the worker. In this respect, the Government merely indicates in its report that the country does not dispose of a formal list determining carcinogenic substances and agents, but that Guyana is guided by research done by the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). The Committee accordingly requests the Government to explain the framework in which such guidance takes place and to indicate the results of this guidance with regard to the application of this Article of the Convention.

2. Article 2. With regard to the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents to which workers may be exposed in the course of their work by non-carcinogenic or less harmful substances, the Committee notes the Government’s indication to the effect that the National Agriculture Research Institute (NARI) does the necessary research and that it gives advice to importers to import chemicals that are not carcinogenic. In addition, farmers and their organizations are educated on the need to use less carcinogenic chemicals. The Committee understands from the Government’s indications that the final decision concerning the possible substitution of carcinogenic substances and agents by non- or less harmful substances and agents is left to the discretion of the importers and users, like farmers. It accordingly hopes that the draft regulations on the safe use of chemicals at work will contain a regulation providing for the obligation to substitute carcinogenic substances and agents whenever possible. The Committee further hopes that the above regulations will also provide for the reduction of the number of workers as well as the duration and degree of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents to the minimum compatible with safety, in order to give full effect to this Article of the Convention.

3. Article 3. Referring to its previous comments and with regard to the establishment of permissible exposure limits in the framework of measures to be taken pursuant to Article 3 of the Convention to protect the workers against the risks of exposure, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that Guyana is guided by research done by the ACGIH. The Committee, noting that one of the main activities of the ACGIH is the establishment of threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents, requests the Government to indicate whether the threshold limits set forth by the ACGIH have a binding character and are in deed observed in the country. As to the establishment of an appropriate system of records of exposure of workers at risk, the Committee recalls again that the provision of section 61 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, does not give full effect to Article 3 of the Convention, since it obliges only the employer to establish and maintain an inventory of all hazardous chemicals and physical agents present at the workplace. The Committee therefore draws the Government’s attention to Paragraph 15, subparagraphs 1 and 2, of the Occupational Cancer Recommendation, 1974 (No. 147), recommending the establishment and maintenance of a system of records by the competent authority in association with individual employers. Moreover, it is indicated in the ILO publication Occupational cancer: Prevention and control, Occupational Safety and Health Series No. 39, that the purpose of a register containing the names of exposed persons, the result of technical monitoring, special medical examinations and laboratory tests performed on these workers is to permit the competent authority "to keep a close watch on the magnitude of the problem of occupational cancer in the country, the level of risk involved in the various types of exposure, the dose-response relationship and the effectiveness of preventive action. In this way, increased knowledge of the various aspects of occupational epidemiology can be gained". The Committee accordingly requests the Government to take the necessary measures to establish an appropriate system of records on national level in order to evaluate the different aspects of occupational cancer.

4. Article 5. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is currently no regulation providing for medical examinations of workers during the period of employment and thereafter, but that this requirement will be addressed in the proposed draft regulations on chemicals which is being drafted by an ILO consultant. The Committee therefore hopes that the above draft regulations will be adopted in the near future to ensure that workers will be provided with, inter alia, medical examinations during the period of employment and thereafter, to give effect to this Article of the Convention.

5. Article 6(a). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the existing legislation applicable, namely the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, will soon be supplemented by regulations in order to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed on every progress accomplished with regard to the elaboration of the regulations on chemicals.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes the adoption of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32 of 1997. It further notes the Government’s indication that consultants from the ILO are in the process of drafting the Regulations to the above Act. In the absence of the text of the 1997 Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32, it has not been possible for the Committee to examine the extent to which the above Act applies the provisions of the Convention. It therefore requests the Government to supply a copy of this Act, as well as of its implementing Regulations, as soon as they are adopted. The Committee hopes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 32 of 1997, as well as the Regulations, will apply the provisions of this Convention and will, in particular, address the points raised by the Committee in its previous direct request which concerned the need to adopt provisions to ensure that there is:

-      consultation of representatives of employers and workers on the measures designed to give effect to the Convention (Article 1 of the Convention);

-      in the light of new knowledge, effective protection of workers against ionizing radiations and constant revision of the maximum permissible doses (Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2);

-      finally, the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiations (Article 10).

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes the information provided with the Government’s report. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act has been adopted in 1997 with the technical assistance of the ILO. It notes that the Act gives effect to Articles 4 and 6(b) and (c) of the Convention.

Moreover, the Committee notes that pursuant to section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, the Minister is empowered to issue regulations enforcing the provisions of the Act and that the ILO has retained a consultant to draft the regulations in order to make the Occupational Safety and Health Act fully operational. The Committee requests the Government to supply a copy of these Regulations as soon as they are adopted.

The Committee notes, however, that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, does not apply the Articles of the Convention mentioned hereafter on which the Committee has made comments for a certain number of years. The Committee accordingly draws the Government’s attention to the following points.

Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 2. The Committee notes that, according to section 59 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the use or intended use of chemical, biological or physical agents may be prohibited, limited or restricted or made subject to conditions, if their use, in the opinion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority, is likely to endanger the health of workers. The Government indicates however that there is no regulatory mechanism to prohibit or grant certifications specifying conditions under which reasonable exposure of carcinogenic substances can be met. The Government further indicates that the Occupational Safety and Health Department, at present, does not determine specific exposure levels for the labour force from those chemical substances that are proven to be carcinogenic. The Committee recalls that Article 1 of the Convention requires the periodic determination of carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure shall be prohibited or made subject to authorization and control. It thus cannot be left to the discretion of the Occupational Safety and Health Authority to determine case by case whether a substance or agent endangers the workers’ health. The Government is accordingly requested to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to establish a mechanism ensuring that the substances and agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or subject to authorization and control are determined periodically.

Article 2. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, does not contain provisions requiring the replacement or substitution of substances or agents by non-carcinogenic or less harmful substances and agents. In this respect, the Government indicates that regulations do not provide for maximum exposure of workers to carcinogenic substances over an eight- hour workday. The Committee therefore points out that, in accordance with this Article of the Convention, the Government must make every effort to replace carcinogenic substances and agents to which workers may be exposed in the course of their work by non-carcinogenic or less harmful substances. Moreover, the number of workers exposed as well as the duration and degree of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents is to be reduced to the minimum compatible with safety. In view of the absence of provisions providing for the above described measures, the Committee hopes that the Regulations, which will be drafted in order to make the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, operational, will contain such preventive and protective measures, in accordance with the provisions of this Article of the Convention.

Article 3. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, does not set or recommend permissible exposure limits for workers or specifies other protective measures to be taken in relation to workers’ exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the near future to adopt appropriate measures to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances and agents, as provided for in Article 3 of the Convention. With regard to the establishment of an appropriate system of records of the exposure of workers at risk, the Committee notes that section 61 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, obliges only the employer to establish and maintain an inventory of all hazardous chemicals and physical agents that are present in the workplace. The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the ILO publication "Occupational cancer: prevention and control", Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 39, indicating that the purpose of a register containing the names of exposed persons, the result of technical monitoring, special medical examinations and laboratory tests performed on these workers is to permit the competent authority "to keep a close watch on the magnitude of the problem of occupational cancer in the country, the level of risk involved in the various types of exposure, the dose-response relationship and the effectiveness of preventive action. In this way, increased knowledge of the various aspects of occupational epidemiology can be gained".

The Government is accordingly requested to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to establish an appropriate system of records in order to evaluate the different aspects of occupational cancer.

Article 5. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, provides neither for medical examinations during the period of employment nor for post-employment medical examinations. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that medical examinations or other tests or investigations are carried out during the period of employment and thereafter as are necessary to evaluate the exposure of workers and to supervise their state of health in relation to occupational hazards, in order to give full effect to Article 5 of the Convention. In this regard, the Committee recalls the importance of both periodic health evaluations at appropriate intervals during employment to determine whether the worker’s health remains compatible with his or her job assignment and to detect any evidence of ill health attributed to employment, and post-assignment health examinations to state whether the job assignments have affected workers’ health, for workers may not reveal any symptoms of cancer until some time after the period of exposure and so there is a serious risk of cancer being undetected if the worker who has been exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents does not undergo medical examinations or tests after employment.

Article 6(a). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, only applies partly the provisions of the Convention, and that in addition methods such as "voluntary compliance" are used by the Occupational Safety and Health Authority to comply with this Act. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to explain the manner in which the methods called "voluntary compliance" apply to the Convention. The Committee further hopes that the Regulations to be issued in application of section 75 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, will be elaborated and adopted in the near future in order to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention.

[The Government is asked to report in detail in 2003.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1998, published 87th ILC session (1999)

I. The Committee notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, has been adopted. It notes that this Act does not contain any specific provision which regulates the use of benzene and products containing benzene as provided for in the Convention. In this respect, the Committee notes the Government's indication that, in the absence of measures giving effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Occupational Safety and Health Division of the Ministry of Labour has been requested to take legal initiative in order to bring the national legislation into conformity with the Convention. To this effect, the Committee would draw the Government's attention once again to the following points.

Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to ensure that harmless or less harmful substitute products are used instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 4. Prohibition of the use of benzene or products containing benzene in certain processes.

Article 5. Occupational hygiene and technical measures to ensure effective protection of exposed workers.

Article 6, paragraph 1. Measures to prevent escape of benzene into the air or places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 2. Determination by the competent authority of the maximum permissible concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 3. Directions issued by the competent authority for measuring benzene in the air.

Article 7, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that, as far as practicable, processes involving the use of benzene are carried out in enclosed systems.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that workers are provided with appropriate means of personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin.

Articles 9 and 10. Measures to provide for medical examinations of workers employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 12. Measures to ensure that containers containing benzene are clearly marked with danger symbols.

The Committee reiterates its hope that the Government will take the necessary measures and will soon be in a position to report on progress made towards the adoption of measures required under the Convention to protect workers against hazards of poisoning arising from benzene.

II. Article 11 of the Convention. The Committee notes that section 41, paragraph 1, of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1997, provides for a general prohibition to employ children in any factory or in the business of a factory outside the factory. In this respect, it would point out that Article 11 calls for measures to prohibit the employment of young persons under 18 years of age, pregnant women and nursing mothers in work processes involving exposure to benzene. The Committee would therefore request the Government to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure that full effect is given to this Article of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

The Committee notes that the Government indicated in its report in December 1994 that a draft Occupational Safety and Health Act containing provisions on radiation protection was being prepared with ILO technical assistance. The Committee was also informed of the adoption in March 1996 of a National Plan of Action on Occupational Safety and Health which indicates that the above-mentioned draft Act is presently the subject of consultations and should be adopted soon. Referring to its previous direct request, and to the general observation made in 1992, the Committee hopes that the Government will be able to indicate in its next report the amendments that have been adopted and, in particular, the provisions taken to ensure that there is:

-- consultation of representatives of employers and workers on the measures designed to give effect to the Convention (Article 1 of the Convention);

-- in the light of new knowledge, effective protection of workers against ionizing radiation and constant revision of the maximum permissible doses (Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2);

-- finally, the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiation (Article 10).

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

Referring to its observation under the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged with respect to the following provisions of the Convention.

Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to ensure that harmless or less harmful substitute products are used instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 4. Prohibition of the use of benzene or products containing benzene in certain processes.

Article 5. Occupational hygiene and technical measures to ensure effective protection of exposed workers.

Article 6, paragraph 1. Measures to prevent escape of benzene into the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 2. Determination by the competent authority of the maximum permissible concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 3. Directions issued by the competent authority for measuring benzene in the air.

Article 7, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that, as far as practicable, processes involving the use of benzene are carried out in enclosed systems.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that workers are provided with appropriate means of personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin.

Articles 9 and 10. Measures to provide for medical examinations of workers employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 11. Measures to prohibit the employment of pregnant women, nursing mothers and young persons under 18 years of age in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 12. Measures to ensure that containers containing benzene are clearly marked with danger symbols.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

1. In comments that it has been making since 1987, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations were too general to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention. The Committee notes the Government's information in its report that a final draft Occupational Safety and Health Act has been prepared by officers at the Attorney-General's chamber for submission to Parliament. The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to report on progress made towards the adoption of specific measures required under the Convention to protect workers against hazards of poisoning arising from benzene.

2. The Committee raises certain points in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

Further to its previous comments the Committee notes the Government's information in its report that, following ILO assistance and consultation with relevant agencies and persons, a final version of the draft Occupational Safety and Health Act is being prepared for submission to Parliament. The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to report on the adoption of the Act and on progress in the application of the Convention, in particular with regard to the following specific requirements of the Convention:

-- the determination of carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or made subject to authorization or control, Article 1 of the Convention;

-- the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure, Article 2;

-- the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and establishment of an appropriate system of records, Article 3;

-- the information to be provided to workers on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken, Article 4; and

-- medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers, Article 5.

The Committee hopes that the Government will also provide information on the measures taken to ensure, in conformity with Article 6(a) of the Convention, that the necessary steps to apply the Convention are taken in consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

In comments it has been making since 1987, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations were too general to give full effect to most of the provisions of the Convention, and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee noted the Government's indication in its report for 1992 that active consideration was still being given to the proposals for legislation concerning benzene, and that assistance from the ILO would be sought as soon as these proposals were accepted.

The Committee notes the Government's indication in its latest report that specific measures to give full effect to the Convention have still not been taken, but a national meeting was to be held in December 1993 to look at legislative reforms in the area of occupational safety and health. The Committee hopes that the Government will supply information on the decisions reached at this meeting on the extent of participation of representatives of employers' and workers' organizations in the meeting, and on progress made towards the adoption of the specific measures required under the Convention to protect workers against hazards of poisoning arising from benzene.

[The Government is asked to report in detail in 1996.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

1. In comments it has been making since 1988, the Committee noted that only ionizing radiations from medical and dental use had been subject to control, and that no other carcinogenic substance had been prohibited or made subject to control. The Government indicated in 1988 that the occupational health and safety sector of the Ministry of Labour was being restructured, that consultations were taking place on a repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act and that with the completion of this exercise it was hoped that other areas of occupational exposure would be covered by control and supervision. In 1992, no progress had been made, and the Committee notes the Government's indication in its latest report that it regretted no action was taken to put in place the requirements of the Convention; however, a national meeting was to be held in December 1993 to look at all aspects of occupational safety and health in the country.

The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to report progress in the application of the Convention, particularly with reference to the following specific requirements of the Convention:

-- the determination of carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or made subject to authorization and control, Article 1 of the Convention;

-- the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure, Article 2 of the Convention; on this point, the Committee also refers to its general observation of 1992 under the Convention;

-- the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and establishment of an appropriate system of record, Article 3 of the Convention;

-- the information to be provided to workers on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken, Article 4 of the Convention; and

-- medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers, Article 5 of the Convention.

The Committee also hopes that the Government will supply information on the structure of the December 1993 meeting, particularly with regard to the participation of representatives of employers' and workers' organizations in the meeting, and on any further measures taken to ensure, in conformity with Article 6(a) of the Convention, that the necessary steps to apply the convention are taken in consultation with the most representative organizations of workers and employers.

2. The Committee previously referred to additional measures to be taken in respect of ionizing radiations for medical and dental use to give effect to Article 1 (paragraph 3) and Article 5 of the Convention. In the absence of further information on this matter, it again expresses the hope that the Government will report progress made in applying the revised versions of the United Kingdom Codes of Practice in this field, and in ensuring that workers shall be provided with medical examinations during the period of their employment and thereafter to evaluate their exposure and the state of their health in relation to occupational hazards.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

I. 1. The Committee noted from the Government's reply in its 1982 report that legislation had not yet been enacted to give effect to Article 10 of the Convention which requires the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiations. It hopes that in the next report the Government will be able to indicate that steps have been taken in this regard.

2. The Committee also noted that measures are still to be taken to ensure the application of Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, which require, in light of current knowledge, that all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure the protection of workers and that dose limits shall be kept under constant review. In this regard, the Committee noted the information in the Government's first report that the Convention was applied by the United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionizing Radiations Arising from Medical and Dental Use. It requests the Government to indicate whether and under what provisions the revision of this Code in 1972 and the revision of the more general Code of Practice against Ionizing Radiations in 1985, in regard to medical and dental use, are applied in Guyana.

3. The Committee further requests the Government to supply copies of the Factories (Health and Welfare) Regulations No. 1951 and the Factories Act Cap 95:02.

II. The Committee would call the Government's attention to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention which sets forth, inter alia, the revised exposure limits established on the basis of new physiological findings by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in its 1990 Recommendations (Publication No. 60). The Committee would recall that, under Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure effective protection of workers against ionizing radiations and to review maximum permissible doses of ionizing radiations in the light of current knowledge. The Government is requested to indicate the steps taken or being considered in relation to the matters raised in the conclusions to the general observation.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

In comments it has been making since 1987, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations were too general to give full effect to most of the provisions of the Convention, and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee noted the Government's indication in its report for 1992 that active consideration was still being given to the proposals for legislation concerning benzene, and that assistance from the ILO would be sought as soon as these proposals were accepted.

The Committee once again expresses the hope that - on the basis of the consideration referred to in the Government's report, if necessary with the technical assistance of the ILO in the preparation of regulations - the Government will adopt the specific measures necessary to give full effect to Articles 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, paragraph 1, Article 8, paragraph 1, Articles 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Convention.

The Committee trusts that the next report will indicate the measures taken or envisaged in this regard.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

1. In comments it has been making since 1988, the Committee noted that only ionizing radiations from medical and dental use had been subject to control, and that no other carcinogenic substance had been prohibited or made subject to control. However, the Government indicated in 1988 that the occupational health and safety sector of the Ministry of Labour was being restructured, that consultations were taking place on a repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act and that with the completion of this exercise it was hoped that other areas of occupational exposure would be covered by control and supervision. The Committee once again requests the Government to supply details concerning the restructuring, its effect on the application of the Convention, as well as developments concerning the repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act. In this connection, the Committee urges the Government to ensure that the necessary steps are taken in consultation with the most representative organizations of workers and employers concerned, as required by Article 6(a) of the Convention to ensure the application of the following provisions of the Convention: Article 1, paragraph 1 (determination of carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or made subject to authorization or control); Article 2 (the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure); Article 3 (the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and establishment of an appropriate system of records); Article 4 (information to be provided to workers on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken); and Article 5 (medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers). The Committee once again expresses the hope that the Government will now report progress made in this regard. 2. In its previous comments, the Committee also had referred to additional measures to be taken in respect of ionizing radiations for medical and dental use to give effect to Article 1, paragraph 3 and Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee noted from the Government's report for 1989 that no progress had been made in these fields. It again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report progress in applying the 1978 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations from Medical and Dental Use, and in ensuring that workers shall be provided with medical examinations during the period of their employment and thereafter as are necessary to evaluate their exposure and the state of their health in relation to the occupational hazards. On this point, the Committee would also refer the Government to its general observation for 1992 under this Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

I. The Committee notes from the Government's report that no change in the application of the Convention has occurred, but that proposals are still under consideration by the Government. It hopes that the Government's next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. The Committee noted from the Government's reply in its 1982 report that legislation had not yet been enacted to give effect to Article 10 of the Convention, which requires the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiations. It hopes that in the next report the Government will be able to indicate that steps have been taken in this regard.

2. The Committee also noted that measures are still to be taken to ensure the application of Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, which require, in light of current knowledge, that all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure the protection of workers and that dose limits shall be kept under constant review. In this regard, the Committee noted that the Government had indicated in its first report that the Convention was applied by the United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionizing Radiations Arising from Medical and Dental Use. It requests the Government to indicate whether and under what provisions the revision of this Code in 1972 and the revision of the more general Code of Practice against Ionizing Radiations in 1985, in regard to medical and dental use, are applied in Guyana.

3. The Committee further requests the Government to supply copies of the Factories (Health and Welfare) Regulations No. 1951 and the Factories Act Cap 95:02.

II. The Committee would call the Government's attention to its general observation of 1992 under this Convention which sets forth, inter alia, the revised exposure limits established on the basis of new physiological findings by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in its 1990 Recommendations (Publication No. 60). The Committee would recall that, under Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure effective protection of workers against ionizing radiations and to review maximum permissible doses of ionizing radiations in the light of current knowledge. The Government is requested to indicate the steps taken or being considered in relation to the matters raised in the conclusions to the general observation.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

In comments it has been making since 1987, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations were too general to give full effect to most of the provisions of the Convention, and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee notes the Government's indication in its latest report that active consideration is still being given to the proposals for legislation concerning benzene, and that assistance from the ILO would be sought as soon as these proposals are accepted.

The Committee once again expresses the hope that - on the basis of the consideration referred to in the Government's report, if necessary with the technical assistance of the ILO in the preparation of regulations - the Government will adopt the specific measures necessary to give full effect to Articles 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, paragraph 1, Article 8, paragraph 1, Articles 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Convention.

The Committee trusts that the next report will indicate the measures taken or envisaged in this regard.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Commmittee notes with regret the indication in the Government's report that no progress has been made since its last report received in 1989.

1. In comments it has been making since 1988, the Committee noted that only ionizing radiations from medical and dental use had been subject to control, and that no other carcinogenic substance had been prohibited or made subject to control. However, the Government indicated in 1988 that the occupational health and safety sector of the Ministry of Labour was being restructured, that consultations were taking place on a repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act and that with the completion of this exercise it was hoped that other areas of occupational exposure would be covered by control and supervision.

The Committee once again requests the Government to supply details concerning the restructuring, its effect on the application of the Convention, as well as developments concerning the repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act.

In this connection, the Committee urges the Government to ensure that the necessary steps are taken in consultation with the most representative organizations of workers and employers concerned, as required by Article 6(a) of the Convention to ensure the application of the following provisions of the Convention: Article 1, paragraph 1 (determination of carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure is prohibited or made subject to authorization or control); Article 2 (the replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure); Article 3 (the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and establishment of an appropriate system of records); Article 4 (information to be provided to workers on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken); and Article 5 (medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers).

The Committee once again expresses the hope that the Government will now report progress made in this regard.

2. In its previous comments, the Committee also had referred to additional measures to be taken in respect of ionizing radiations for medical and dental use to give effect to Article 1, paragraph 3 and Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee noted from the Government's report for 1989 that no progress had been made in these fields. It again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report progress in applying the 1978 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations from Medical and Dental Use, and in ensuring that workers shall be provided with medical examinations during the period of their employment and thereafter as are necessary to evaluate their exposure and the state of their health in relation to the occupational hazards. On this point, the Committee would also refer the Government to its general observation for 1992 under this Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

I. The Committee notes from the Government's report that no change in the application of the Convention has occurred since the Government's last report which was communicated in 1986. It hopes that the Government's next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. The Committee noted from the Government's reply in its 1982 report that legislation had not yet been enacted to give effect to Article 10 of the Convention, which requires the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionising radiations. It hopes that in the next report the Government will be able to indicate that steps have been taken in this regard.

2. The Committee also noted that measures are still to be taken to ensure the application of Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, which require, in light of current knowledge, that all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure the protection of workers and that dose limits shall be kept under constant review. In this regard, the Committee noted that the Government had indicated in its first report that the Convention was applied by the United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations Arising from Medical and Dental Use. It requests the Government to indicate whether and under what provisions the revision of this Code in 1972 and the revision of the more general Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations in 1985, in regard to medical and dental use, are applied in Guyana.

3. The Committee further requests the Government to supply copies of the Factories (Health and Welfare) Regulations No. 1951 and the Factories Act Cap 95:02.

II. The Committee would call the Government's attention to its General Observation under this Convention which sets forth, inter alia, the revised exposure limits established on the basis of new physiological findings by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in its 1990 Recommendations (Publication No. 60). The Committee would recall that, under Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure effective protection of workers against ionising radiations and to review maximum permissible doses of ionising radiations in the light of current knowledge. The Government is requested to indicate the steps taken or being considered in relation to the matters raised in the conclusions to the General Observation.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request.

In previous comments, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations are too general to give full effect to most of the provisions of the Convention, and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee noted the Government's indication in its report received in 1989 that active consideration was being given to the customary manner of the use of benzene in an effort to recommend regulations to the Government, and that assistance from the ILO would be sought should these proposals find favour for implementation.

The Committee observes that in ratifying the Convention, the Government has accepted the obligation to take such steps as may be necessary to give effect to its provisions. The Committee accordingly again expresses the hope that - on the basis of the active consideration referred to in the Government's report, if necessary with the technical assistance of the ILO in the preparation of regulations - the Government will adopt the specific measures necessary to give full effect to the following provisions of the Convention:

Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to ensure that harmless or less-harmful substitute products are used instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 4. Prohibition of the use of benzene or products containing benzene in certain processes.

Article 5. Occupational hygiene and technical measures to ensure effective protection of exposed workers.

Article 6, paragraph 1. Measures to prevent escape of benzene into the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 2. Determination by the competent authority of the maximum permissible concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 3. Directions issued by the competent authority for measuring benzene in the air.

Article 7, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that, as far as practicable, processes involving the use of benzene are carried out in enclosed systems.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that workers are provided with appropriate means of personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin.

Articles 9 and 10. Measures to provide for medical examinations of workers employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 11. Measures to prohibit the employment of pregnant women, nursing mothers and young persons under 18 years of age in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 12. Measures to ensure that containers containing benzene are clearly marked with danger symbols.

The Committee hopes that the next report will indicate the measures taken or envisaged in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

The Commmittee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. In previous comments, the Committee noted that only ionising radiations from medical and dental use had been subject to control, and that no other carcinogenic substance had been prohibited or made subject to control. However, the Government had indicated in 1988 that the occupational health and safety sector of the Ministry of Labour was being restructured, that consultations were taking place on a repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act and that with the completion of this exercise it was hoped that other areas of occupational exposure would be covered by control and supervision. In its 1989 request, the Committee listed a number of measures which it hoped would be taken as a result of these developments to give effect to the Convention.

The Committee noted from the Government's latest report that, while it was still expected that on the completion of the restructuring exercise of the Occupational Health and Safety Division, greater effect would be given to the Articles of the Convention, particularly to determine carcinogenic substances, etc., and protection against exposure to these substances or agents; no substantial progress had been made in these areas.

The Committee requests the Government to supply details concerning the restructuring, its effect on the Convention as well as developments concerning the repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act. The Committee again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report on concrete steps taken to give effect to the provisions of the Convention.

In this connection, the Committee again draws attention to the following measures to be taken in consultation with the most representative organisations of workers and employers concerned, as required by Article 6(a) of the Convention.

In particular, measures should be taken in the near future, in accordance with Article 1, paragraph 1, to determine carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure should be prohibited or made subject to authorisation or control, and those to which other provisions of the Convention should be applied. In making such determinations the Government may wish to take into account the lists of carcinogenic substances and agents appearing in Appendix 1 of the ILO manual "Occupational cancer: Prevention and control" (ILO, Occupational Safety and Health Series (No. 39)) and the IARC Monographs Supplement 4, published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the progress made or envisaged to apply the United Kingdom revised versions of the Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations in order to ensure that consideration is given to the latest information in the field of carcinogenic substances (Article 1, paragraph 3).

Measures should also be taken to protect workers against the risks inherent in exposure to carcinogenic substances so determined. They should provide for the replacement of these substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure (Article 2 of the Convention); the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and the establishment of an appropriate system of records (Article 3); the information of the workers concerned on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken (Article 4); and the medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers (Article 5).

The Committee hopes that the next report will indicate progress made in this regard.

2. In its previous comments, the Committee also had referred to additional measures to be taken in respect of ionising radiations for medical and dental use to give effect to Articles 1, paragraph 3, and 5 of the Convention. The Committee noted from the Government's report for 1989 that no progress had been made in these fields. It again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report progress in applying the 1978 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations from Medical and Dental Use and the more general 1985 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations, and in ensuring that workers shall be provided with medical examinations during the period of their employment and thereafter as are necessary to evaluate their exposure and the state of their health in relation to the occupational hazards.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. The Committee noted from the Government's reply in its 1982 report that legislation had not yet been enacted to give effect to Article 10 of the Convention, which requires the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionising radiations. It hopes that in the next report the Government will be able to indicate that steps have been taken in this regard.

2. The Committee also noted that measures are still to be taken to ensure the application of Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, which require, in light of current knowledge, that all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure the protection of workers and that dose limits shall be kept under constant review. In this regard, the Committee noted that the Government had indicated in its first report that the Convention was applied by the United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations Arising from Medical and Dental Use. It requests the Government to indicate whether and under what provisions the revision of this Code in 1972 and the revision of the more general Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations in 1985, in regard to medical and dental use, are applied in Guyana.

3. The Committee further requests the Government to supply copies of the Factories (Health and Welfare) Regulations No. 1951 and the Factories Act Cap 95:02.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

In previous comments, the Committee noted that national laws and regulations are too general to give full effect to most of the provisions of the Convention, and that specific measures should therefore be taken to regulate the use of benzene and products containing benzene in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee notes the Government's indication in its report that active consideration is being given to the customary manner of the use of benzene in an effort to recommend regulations to the Government, and that assistance from the ILO will be sought should these proposals find favour for implementation.

The Committee observes that in ratifying the Convention, the Government has accepted the obligation to take such steps as may be necessary to give effect to its provisions. The Committee accordingly again expresses the hope that - on the basis of the active consideration referred to in the Government's report, if necessary with the technical assistance of the ILO in the preparation of regulations - the Government will adopt the specific measures necessary to give full effect to the following provisions of the Convention:

Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to ensure that harmless or less-harmful substitute products are used instead of benzene or products containing benzene.

Article 4. Prohibition of the use of benzene or products containing benzene in certain processes.

Article 5. Occupational hygiene and technical measures to ensure effective protection of exposed workers.

Article 6, paragraph 1. Measures to prevent escape of benzene into the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 2. Determination by the competent authority of the maximum permissible concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment.

Article 6, paragraph 3. Directions issued by the competent authority for measuring benzene in the air.

Article 7, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that, as far as practicable, processes involving the use of benzene are carried out in enclosed systems.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Measures to ensure that workers are provided with appropriate means of personal protection against the risk of absorbing benzene through the skin.

Articles 9 and 10. Measures to provide for medical examinations of workers employed in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

11. Measures to prohibit the employment of pregnant women, nursing mothers and young persons under 18 years of age in work processes involving exposure to benzene.

Article 12. Measures to ensure that containers containing benzene are clearly marked with danger symbols.

The Committee hopes that the next report will indicate the measures taken or envisaged in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

1. In previous comments, the Committee noted that only ionising radiations from medical and dental use had been subject to control, and that no other carcinogenic substance had been prohibited or made subject to control. However, the Government had indicated in 1988 that the occupational health and safety sector of the Ministry of Labour was being restructured, that consultations were taking place on a repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act and that with the completion of this exercise it was hoped that other areas of occupational exposure would be covered by control and supervision. In its 1989 request, the Committee listed a number of measures which it hoped would be taken as a result of these developments to give effect to the Convention.

The Committee notes from the Government's latest report that, while it is still expected that on the completion of the restructuring exercise of the Occupational Health and Safety Division, greater effect will be given to the Articles of the Convention, particularly to determine carcinogenic substances, etc., and protection against exposure to these substances or agents; to date, no substantial progress has been made in these areas.

The Committee requests the Government to supply details concerning the restructuring, its effect on the Convention as well as developments concerning the repeal and re-enactment of the Factories Act. The Committee again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report on concrete steps taken to give effect to the provisions of the Convention.

In this connection, the Committee again draws attention to the following measures to be taken in consultation with the most representative organisations of workers and employers concerned, as required by Article 6(a) of the Convention.

In particular, measures should be taken in the near future, in accordance with Article 1, paragraph 1, to determine carcinogenic substances or agents to which occupational exposure should be prohibited or made subject to authorisation or control, and those to which other provisions of the Convention should be applied. In making such determinations the Government may wish to take into account the lists of carcinogenic substances and agents appearing in Appendix 1 of the ILO manual "Occupational cancer: Prevention and control" (ILO, Occupational Safety and Health Series (No. 39)) and the IARC Monographs Supplement 4, published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the progress made or envisaged to apply the United Kingdom revised versions of the Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations in order to ensure that consideration is given to the latest information in the field of carcinogenic substances (Article 1, paragraph 3).

Measures should also be taken to protect workers against the risks inherent in exposure to carcinogenic substances so determined. They should provide for the replacement of these substances and agents by less harmful substances or agents, and the reduction to the minimum of the number of workers exposed and the level and duration of exposure (Article 2 of the Convention); the protection of workers against the risks of exposure and the establishment of an appropriate system of records (Article 3); the information of the workers concerned on the dangers involved and the measures to be taken (Article 4); and the medical examinations and biological and other tests and investigations for exposed workers (Article 5).

The Committee hopes that the next report will indicate progress made in this regard.

2. In its previous comments, the Committee also had referred to additional measures to be taken in respect of ionising radiations for medical and dental use to give effect to Articles 1, paragraph 3, and 5 of the Convention. The Committee notes from the Government's report that no progress has been made in these fields. It again expresses the hope that the Government will soon be in a position to report progress in applying the 1978 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations from Medical and Dental Use and the more general 1985 revised United Kingdom Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations, and in ensuring that workers shall be provided with medical examinations during the period of their employment and thereafter as are necessary to evaluate their exposure and the state of their health in relation to the occupational hazards.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1987, published 74th ILC session (1987)

1. The Committee notes from the Government's reply to its previous direct request that legislation has not yet been enacted to give effect to Article 10 of the Convention, which requires the notification of work involving exposure of workers to ionising radiations. It hopes that in the next report the Government will be able to indicate that steps have been taken in this regard.

2. The Committee also notes that measures are still to be taken to ensure the application of Article 3, paragraph 1 and Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention, which require, in light of current knowledge, that all appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure the protection of workers and that dose limits shall be kept under constant review. In this regard, the Committee notes that the Government had indicated in its first report that the Convention is applied by the United Kingdom Code of Practice for the Protection of Persons against Ionising Radiations Arising from Medical and Dental Use. It requests the Government to indicate whether and under what provisions the revision of this Code in 1972 and the revision of the more general Code of Practice against Ionising Radiations in 1985, in regard to medical and dental use, are applied in Guyana.

3. The Committee further requests the Government to supply copies of the Factories (Health and Welfare) Regulations No. 1951 and the Factories Act Cap 95:02.