Individual Case (CAS) - Discussion: 1989, Publication: 76th ILC session (1989)

See under IA, as follows:

In response to the comments made by the Committee of Experts, the Government has communicated information on the application of Conventions Nos. 26, 30, 98, 100 and 119.

In addition, a Government representative stated that his Government's delegation had been in touch with the Office and had provided information in reply to the Committee of Experts' comments on the Conventions mentioned above, together with copies of the legislation requested by the Committee of Experts. He announced that the Government would make every effort to include further details as available in its next Article 22 report.

The Workers' members commented that, through its contacts with the Office, the Government had already taken a great step forward; they also welcomed the assurance that every effort would be made to improve the communication of further details. They recalled the very great importance of the obligation to supply reports, and especially of replying to the Committee of Experts observations and direct requests. Without replies to precise direct requests and observations, the ILO's supervisory machinery could not work. In this connection, they referred to the Committee of Experts' concern, expressed in paragraphs 87 and 88 of its report, about the large number of cases in which there had been no reply to its comments. Although there had been slightly fewer than in the previous year, the figure still stood at 177 cases. They hoped that, with contacts having been made and communication established despite administrative difficulties, the Government would be able to send in its replies to comments in future; if necessary, other forms of assistance should be furnished to the Government.

The Employers' members commented that this was the first case to be considered in this session concerning the duty to reply to comments of the Committee of Experts; they intended to deal with all such cases in the same fashion by pointing at the importance, for the supervisory machinery, of compliance with the obligation to report, as well as of replying to direct requests and observations. Whilst not wishing in any way to rank the respective importance of the five Conventions on which the reports requested were missing, there were two very important ones: the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention (No. 98), 1949, and the Equal Remuneration Convention (No. 100), 1951. The importance of the obligation to report has already been raised by this Committee with the Government in 1985, and the Employers' members hoped very much that in future reports would indeed be sent as required and that, as far as possible, the Office could give any necessary assistance.

The Government representative indicated, with respect to the Minimum Wage-Fixing Machinery Convention (No. 26), 1928, that in Ghana adequate machinery existed for fixing minimum wages, through a tripartite committee; the minimum wage had last been fixed in February 1989 and was binding on all employers. As regards the Hours of Work (Commerce and Offices) Convention (No. 30), 1930, there was a national committee on labour, which had been reconstituted in February 1989, and whose functions included advising the Minister on procedural points for legislation on labour and industrial relations. This committee had furnished the Minister with a memorandum on the revision of hours of work in commerce.

The Committee took note of the information provided by the Government representative. The Committee noted that, at the time of the meeting of the Committee of Experts, the Government had not supplied answers to the comments of the Committee of Experts. It noted, however, that replies had now been handed to the Office. The Committee also noted the assurances given by the Government representative that the failure to send replies would no longer occur.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on working time, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 1 and 30 (hours of work), 14 and 106 (weekly rest) and 89 (night work (women)) together.

Legislative developments. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that it is currently reviewing the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651), and that most of the previous points raised by the Committee will be addressed through the adoption of the Labour Bill 2024. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of the revised Labour Act, once adopted. It also requests the Government to provide information on the consultations that have taken place with the social partners in this regard.

A. Hours of work

Articles 1 to 8 of Convention No. 1 and Articles 1 to 12 of Convention No. 30. Application of the Conventions. Following to its previous comments, the Committee notes that:

Limits on normal hours of work. Section 33 of the Labour Act provides that the hours of work of a worker shall be a maximum of eight hours a day or 40 hours a week except in cases expressly provided for in this Act. The Committee recalls that Article 2 of Convention No. 1 and Article 3 of Convention No. 30 establish a double daily and weekly limit of eight hours a day and 48 hours a week to normal working hours. This limit is cumulative, and not alternative.

Variable distribution of normal daily and weekly hours of work: (i) Section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows variable distribution of hours of work over a reference period of up to four weeks, provided that the average number of hours shall not exceed eight hours per day or 40 hours per week; (ii) section 34(c) of the Labour Act permits variable distribution of hours of work over a reference period of up to one year for seasonal work, subject to an average number of hours of work that shall not exceed eight hours per day, and subject to a daily limit of 10 hours for any day; and (iii) section 36 of the Labour Act allows for hours of work of workers doing shift work to be averaged over a reference period of up to four weeks. The Committee observes that except for section 36 on shift work, the other abovementioned provisions do not set out any precise circumstances under which it is allowed to resort to averaging of working hours. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, labour inspectors ensure that daily limits of 10 hours per day are not exceeded in practice, and that such limits are inclusive of overtime work. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that it will consult with social partners to find a solution regarding section 34(b) of the Labour Act. While noting the Government’s explanations on this issue, the Committee recalls that, in general terms, the Conventions only authorize the averaging of working hours over a reference period of one week and on condition that the daily limits of nine or 10 hours are not exceeded (Article 2(b)) of Convention No. 1 and Article 4 of Convention No. 30); and that in all other cases, where the averaging of working hours over periods of more than one week is allowed on an exceptional basis, the circumstances and conditions must be clearly specified, as follows:

• where persons are employed in shifts, working time may exceed eight hours in any one day and 48 hours in any one week provided that the average number of hours over a period of three weeks or less does not exceed eight per day and 48 per week (Article 2(c) of Convention No. 1);
• the daily and weekly limits on working time may also be exceeded in work which, by reason of its nature, is required to be carried on continuously by a succession of shifts, on condition that the average working hours do not exceed 56 in the week (Article 4 of Convention No. 1); and
• in exceptional cases where it is recognized that the limits of eight hours per day and 48 hours per week cannot be applied, agreements between workers' and employers' organizations (Convention No. 1) or regulations made by public authority (Convention No. 30) can fix a longer limit on daily working hours provided that the average weekly working time, calculated for the number of weeks specified by these agreements, does not exceed 48 hours per week (Article 5 of Convention No. 1) and daily working time does not exceed 10 hours in any day (Article 6 of Convention No. 30).

Temporary exceptions: Pursuant to section 38 of the Labour Act, workers can be required to work beyond fixed hours of work without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the undertaking. The Committee observes that apart from the case of accidents, this provision does not specify the other exceptional circumstances that might justify requiring additional hours of work. The Committee recalls that Article 3 of Convention No. 1 and Article 7(2)(a) of Convention No. 30 allow additional work to be performed in limited circumstances (in case of accident, actual or threatened, force majeure, or urgent work to machinery or plant), and only so far as may be necessary to avoid serious interference with the ordinary working of the establishment.

Permanent exceptions: section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act provides that workers may be compelled to do overtime work in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime to be viable. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that: (i) those enterprises are not spelt out in legislation, but cover, in practice, essential services such as transport, hospitality, and communication networks, as well as security services and graphic communications; and (ii) companies covered under section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act shall not work more than 10 hours per day. The Committee recalls that, pursuant to Article 6(1)(a) of Convention No. 1 and Article 7(1) of Convention No. 30, permanent exceptions must be allowed only for limited, defined categories of work, including preparatory or complementary work, essentially intermittent work, and shops and other establishments where the nature of the work, the size of the population or the number of persons employed render inapplicable the daily and weekly limits on working hours. They must also be determined by regulations after consultation with the organisations of employers and workers concerned, and determine the maximum number of additional hours in each instance.

Rate of pay for overtime: section 35(2) of the Labour Act does not establish statutory minimum rates of pay for overtime work. In this regard, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that, in practice, those rates are fixed by employers, and are negotiated with employees or their representatives. The Committee recalls that Article 6(2) of Convention No.1 and Article 7(4) of Convention No. 30 specify that the rate of pay for overtime shall not be less than one and one-quarter times the regular rate.

B. Weekly rest

Permanent and temporary exceptions. Circumstances. No provision of the Labour Act sets specific circumstances for resorting to overtime during the weekly rest period. However, overtime is allowed under the Labour Act (Sections 35 and 38 of the Labour Act). The Committee emphasizes the importance of all authorized exceptions in the commerce and offices sectors to the normal 24-hours weekly rest period remaining limited to the cases enumerated in Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Convention No. 106. It also recalls that exceptions to weekly rest in the industrial sector should only be established having special regard to all proper humanitarian and economic considerations by virtue of Article 4(1) of Convention No. 14. In addition, the Committee recalls that both Conventions require consultations with employers’ and workers’ organizations regarding the adoption of permanent and temporary exceptions allowed both in the commerce and office and industrial sectors (pursuant to Article 4 of Convention No. 14 and Article 7(4) of Convention No. 106).

Compensatory rest. No provisions in the Labour Act foresee the granting of compensatory rest in case of work during the weekly rest period. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that employers compensate workers in practice when they work on their day of weekly rest, and that provisions on weekly rest compensation are sometimes found in collective bargaining agreements. The Committee recalls that under Article 5 of Convention No. 14 in the industrial sector, provision of compensatory periods of rest shall be made, as far as possible, in case of exceptions to the weekly rest period, and that under Article 8(3) of Convention No. 106, in the commerce and office sectors, where temporary exemptions are made, the persons concerned shall be granted compensatory rest of a total duration at least equivalent to 24 consecutive hours within each seven-day period.

Information and enforcement concerning working time

Posting of hours of work and records of additional hours of work. No provision of the legislation seems to give effect to these requirements of the Conventions. In this respect, the Government indicates that employers are required in practice, and through certain collective agreements, to notify employees about elements related to hours of work and rest periods. The Committee recalls that Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Convention No. 1, Article 11(2)(a) and (b) of Convention No. 30 and Article 7 of Convention No. 14 require employers to notify, by the posting of notices, or by such method as may be approved by the competent authority: (i) the times at which hours of work begin and end, and, for shift work, the times at which each shift begins and ends; (ii) rest periods; and (iii) the day of collective weekly rest, and the workers or employees subject to a special system of rest, indicating that system. The Committee also recalls that under Article 8(1)(c) of Convention No. 1 and Article 11(2)(c) of Convention No. 30, employers shall be required to keep records of additional hours of work performed.

Enforcement and penalties concerning working time. Section 173 of the Labour Act does not contain any provision of substance concerning offences and penalties to be applied for violations of provisions on working time. The Committee recalls that Article 8(2) of Convention No.1, Articles 11(3) and 12 of Convention No. 30 and Article 10(2) of Convention No. 106 require taking measures to ensure the enforcement of the Conventions, including in the form of penalties.

In the context of the ongoing labour law reform, the Committee expresses its firm hope that all the comments above on Conventions Nos 1, 30, 14 and 106 will be duly taken into consideration in order to bring the national legislation in conformity with these Conventions.

C. Night work

Article 3 of Convention No. 89. Prohibition of night work for women. The Committee notes that in previous reports, the Government has indicated that the Labour Act does not provide for a general prohibition regarding night work for women. The Committee also notes that, according to the Government, it would take the necessary steps to ratify the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), after the Labour Bill has been passed into law. In this regard, the Committee wishes to recall that pregnant and breastfeeding women may be particularly vulnerable to night work, and it emphasizes the importance of women night workers in this situation being given an alternative to night work (see the General Survey of 2018 concerning working-time instruments, paragraph 545). Consequently, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to protect women night workers with regard to maternity. Further noting that the country is still bound by the Night Work (Women) (Revised) Convention, 1948 (No. 89), the Committee recalls that the window for denunciation of the Convention will be open from 27 February 2031 to 27 February 2032.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report merely reproduces the same information contained in its last report of 2008. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous request which concerned the following points:

Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee had noted that, according to the Government, the maximum working hours of task workers is eight hours per day and 40 hours per week. Nonetheless, it had recalled that section 44 of the Labour Act provides that section 33, with respect to maximum hours of work, does not apply to task workers. The Committee requests once again the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work of this category of workers.

Article 2(c). Shift work. The Committee recalls that this provision allows the average number of hours worked to be calculated over a maximum period of four weeks in the case of shift work, whereas Article 2(c) of the Convention provides that, for this category of workers, the reference period must not exceed three weeks. The Committee requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to bring section 36 of the Labour Act into conformity with the Convention. Furthermore, given that section 36 is only applicable if there is an established timetable for the shifts, the Committee requests the Government once again to specify the scope of this provision.

Article 3. Overtime hours – Exceptional circumstances. The Committee had noted that, according to the Government, section 38 of the Labour Act is in conformity with Article 3 of the Convention. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that this Article of the Convention allows for the maximum hours of work to be exceeded in case of accident, actual or threatened, or in the case of urgent work to be done to machinery or plant, or in the case of force majeure. In this context, it points out that, under the terms of section 38 of the Labour Act, a worker may be required to work beyond the fixed hours of work without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, ‘‘including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the undertaking”. However, apart from the case of accidents, this provision does not specify the exceptional circumstances that might justify requiring additional hours of work. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide more details on this point, so that it might determine whether, apart from the case of accidents duly mentioned, the exceptional circumstances referred to under section 38 of the Labour Act fulfil the conditions set by Article 3 of the Convention.

Article 5. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee recalls that section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows for the average number of hours of work to be reckoned over a period of four weeks, without limiting this possibility to exceptional cases in which it is recognized that the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week cannot be applied, as provided in Article 5 of the Convention. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in application of this Article of the Convention is conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, and its approval under regulations adopted by the competent authority, which is not provided for under section 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention and to make it conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, approved by the competent authority. It further notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act still allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government once again to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Article 6(1)(b) and (2). Temporary exceptions. The Committee noted that, in its report, the Government had referred to the provisions of section 35(3)(b) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to work overtime, in particular in cases of emergency, in order to prevent threats against life and property. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that its previous comments on the application of Article 6(1)(b) and (2), of the Convention referred to section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers could also be compelled to perform overtime hours if they were employed in enterprises the very nature of which required overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision, to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to exceptional cases of pressure of work and to specify if legislative provisions establish the maximum number of additional hours of work authorized in each case. Finally, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the wage rate for additional hours has to be increased by not less than 25 per cent of the regular wage, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to have fixed rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the minimum rate. The Committee requests the Government once again to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Article 8(1). Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee had noted that, according to the Government, hours of work are usually fixed by the rules of each enterprise. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 8(2). Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee requests the Government once again to indicate whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside the hours fixed or during rest periods is considered an offence, as stipulated by this provision of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Total and partial exceptions. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Articles 7 and 8 of Weekly Rest (Commerce and Offices) Convention, 1957 (No. 106).

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report merely reproduces the same information contained in its last report of 2008. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous request which concerned the following points.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee had noted that, according to the Government, task workers in commercial establishments are entitled to a limitation of their working time, as well as to rest periods. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that, in accordance with section 44 of the Labour Act, section 33 of this Act with respect to maximum hours of work does not apply to task workers. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work for this category of workers.

Articles 6 and 8. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes that the Government has merely reproduced the provisions of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, which allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of four weeks, without limiting this arrangement, as provided under Article 6 of the Convention, to exceptional cases where the circumstances in which the work has to be carried on make the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week inapplicable. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in accordance with the Articles of the Convention requires the adoption of regulations made after consultation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, special regard being paid to collective agreements concluded by these organizations. Such regulations are not provided for under article 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee asks the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention, and to make them conditional upon regulations made by the competent and national authority, adopted after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned. Furthermore, it requests the Government once again to limit to ten hours the daily working hours for the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, as prescribed by this provision of the Convention. The Government is also asked to indicate whether shift work, covered under section 36 of the Labour Act, is a form of organization of work found in commercial establishments or establishments in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work. The Committee also notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme of averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Articles 7(2) and 8. Temporary exceptions. The Committee had previously noted the Government’s reference to section 38 of the Labour Act, which allows enterprises to require workers to perform additional hours without extra pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including in the case of “an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the enterprise”. In this respect, it had noted that, according to the Government, it is up to the employers to specify the circumstances other than an accident under which additional hours of work without pay may be performed. The Committee recalls, however, that Article 7(2) of the Convention only allows the granting of temporary exceptions, apart from accidents, in very specific circumstances: in case of urgent work to machinery or plant; in case of force majeure; in order to prevent the loss of perishable goods or avoid endangering the technical results of the work; in order to allow for special work such as stocktaking and the preparation of balance sheets; or in the case of an abnormal pressure of work. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will take measures to limit, in a manner that is in conformity with the Convention, the situations in which employers are authorized to ask their employees to do additional hours of work.

Furthermore, the Committee notes that the Government has not replied to its previous comments on section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to do overtime work if they are employed in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision; to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to cases in which such enterprises have to deal with cases of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances, in so far as the employer cannot ordinarily be expected to resort to other measures; and to stipulate whether legal provisions establish the number of additional hours of work allowed in the day and in the year. Furthermore, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the rate of pay of overtime has to be increased by at least 25 per cent in relation to the regular rate, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to fix rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the statutory minimum rate. The Committee requests the Government to indicate once again the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Finally, the Committee had previously noted the Government indications that it consults employers’ and workers’ organizations on labour matters at all times. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the consultations previously held which led to the determination of the types of temporary exceptions provided under the Labour Act.

Article 11(2). Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee had noted that according to the information provided by the Government, hours of work are generally stipulated in enterprise rules. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 11(3). Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee requests the Government once again whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside established working hours or during rest periods is considered an offence, as provided by this provision of the Convention.

Article 12. Penalties. The Committee noted that, in reply to its previous comments, the Government had referred to section 173 of the Labour Act. It nevertheless points out that this section only concerns the responsibility of governing bodies of legal entities and does not contain any provision of substance concerning the penalties to be applied for a violation of regulations on working time. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the system of penalties to ensure the enforcement of the national legislation on hours of work.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report merely reproduces the same information contained in its last report of 2008. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous request which concerned the following points.

Article 3 of the Convention. Prohibition of night work for women. Further to its previous comment in which the Committee noted that the Labour Act, 2003, no longer gives effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that the Ministry of Manpower, Youth and Employment has been advised of the Committee’s recommendations and will duly examine, in consultation with other competent authorities such as the Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs (MOWAC), the National Labour Commission and the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), the possibility of ratifying the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171).

In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 92–93 of its General Survey of 2001 on the night work of women in industry, in which it noted with concern the large number of member States which opted to no longer apply one of the relevant Conventions, Nos 4, 41 or 89, without however taking any concrete measures under ILO constitutional procedures with a view to formally terminating their obligations arising out of those Conventions. The Committee insists that the governments concerned should take the necessary action to remove any contradiction between international treaty obligations that might have grown outdated over time, and domestic legislation, in the interest of preserving a coherent body of international labour standards and giving full meaning to the Organization’s supervisory organs. For all useful purposes, the Committee recalls that Convention No. 89 may be denounced every ten years and will again be open to denunciation for a period of one year as from 27 February 2021. The Committee once again draws the attention of the Government to the possibility of ratifying Convention No. 171. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on any decision taken with respect to Convention No. 89.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report merely reproduces the same information contained in its last report of 2008. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous request which concerned the following points.

Articles 7 and 8 of the Convention. Permanent and temporary exemptions. The Committee notes that the Labour Act, 2003, does not appear to authorize, or otherwise regulate, work during the weekly rest period neither by reason of standard needs (special weekly rest schemes) nor on grounds of unforeseen circumstances (temporary exemptions). Given the fact that there is a real need to keep certain establishments in operation on the day of rest, which may be inherent (for example in the case of hospitals, hotels, newspapers, continuous processes, transport, etc.) or exceptional (for example in the case of major accidents, force majeure or urgent work to equipment), the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged in order to give full effect to these Articles of the Convention, including the obligation to grant compensatory rest of a total duration of at least 24 hours to those performing work on a weekly rest day.

Article 10(2). Sanctions. The Committee observes that the Labour Act does not appear to provide for specific penalties for failure to apply its provisions on weekly rest. The Committee therefore requests the Government to specify the legal provisions, and transmit a copy of any relevant text, establishing penalties to ensure the enforcement of the standards concerning weekly rest.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the maximum working hours of task workers is eight hours per day and 40 hours per week. Nonetheless, it recalls that section 44 of the Labour Act provides that section 33, with respect to maximum hours of work, does not apply to task workers. It therefore requests the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work of this category of workers.

Article 2(c). Shift work. The Committee notes with regret that, in reply to its previous comments on this point, the Government has merely reproduced the text of section 36 of the Labour Act. It therefore feels bound to recall that this provision allows the average number of hours worked to be calculated over a maximum period of four weeks in the case of shift work, whereas Article 2(c) of the Convention provides that, for this category of workers, the reference period must not exceed three weeks. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to bring section 36 of the Labour Act into conformity with the Convention. Furthermore, given that section 36 is only applicable if there is an established timetable for the shifts, the Committee requests the Government once again to specify the scope of this provision.

Article 3. Overtime hours – Exceptional circumstances. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, section 38 of the Labour Act is in conformity with Article 3 of the Convention. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that this Article of the Convention allows for the maximum hours of work to be exceeded in case of accident, actual or threatened, or in the case of urgent work to be done to machinery or plant, or in the case of force majeure. In this context, it points out that, under the terms of section 38 of the Labour Act, a worker may be required to work beyond the fixed hours of work without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, “including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the undertaking”. However, apart from the case of accidents, this provision does not specify the exceptional circumstances that might justify requiring additional hours of work. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to provide more details on this point, so that it might determine whether, apart from the case of accidents duly mentioned, the exceptional circumstances referred to under section 38 of the Labour Act fulfil the conditions set by Article 3 of the Convention.

Article 5. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes with regret that the Government has merely reproduced, as in its two previous reports, the provisions of section 33 of the Labour Act, under which the maximum working time is eight hours per day and 40 hours per week, except in cases provided for under this Act. It therefore feels bound to reiterate its previous comments on this point. The Committee recalls that section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows for the average number of hours of work to be reckoned over a period of four weeks, without limiting this possibility to exceptional cases in which it is recognized that the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week cannot be applied, as provided in Article 5 of the Convention. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in application of this Article of the Convention is conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, and its approval under regulations adopted by the competent authority, which is not provided for under section 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention and to make it conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, approved by the competent authority. It further notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act still allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government once again to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Article 6(1)(b) and (2). Temporary exceptions. The Committee notes that, in its report, the Government refers to the provisions of section 35(3)(b) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to work overtime, in particular in cases of emergency, in order to prevent threats against life and property. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that its previous comments on the application of Article 6(1)(b) and (2), of the Convention referred to section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers could also be compelled to perform overtime hours if they were employed in enterprises the very nature of which required overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision, to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to exceptional cases of pressure of work and to specify if legislative provisions establish the maximum number of additional hours of work authorized in each case. Finally, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the wage rate for additional hours has to be increased by not less than 25 per cent of the regular wage, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to have fixed rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Article 8(1). Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, hours of work are usually fixed by the rules of each enterprise. It requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 8(2). Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not reply to its previous comments on this point. It therefore asks the Government once again to indicate whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside the hours fixed or during rest periods is considered an offence, as stipulated by this provision of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Total and partial exceptions. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Articles 7 and 8 of Convention No. 106.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, task workers in commercial establishments are entitled to a limitation of their working time, as well as to rest periods. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that, in accordance with section 44 of the Labour Act, section 33 of this Act with respect to maximum hours of work does not apply to task workers. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work for this category of workers.

Articles 6 and 8. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes with regret that the Government has merely reproduced the provisions of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, which allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of four weeks, without limiting this arrangement, as provided under Article 6 of the Convention, to exceptional cases where the circumstances in which the work has to be carried on make the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week inapplicable. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in accordance with the Articles of the Convention, requires the adoption of regulations made after consultation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, special regard being paid to collective agreements concluded by these organizations. Such regulations are not provided for under article 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee asks the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention, and to make them conditional upon regulations made by the competent and national authority, adopted after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned. Furthermore, it requests the Government once again to limit to ten hours the daily working hours for the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, as prescribed by this provision of the Convention. The Government is also asked to indicate whether shift work, covered under section 36 of the Labour Act, is a form of organization of work found in commercial establishments or establishments in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work. The Committee also notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Articles 7(2) and 8. Temporary exceptions. The Committee notes the Government’s reference in its report to section 38 of the Labour Act, which allows enterprises to require workers to perform additional hours without extra pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including in the case of “an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the enterprise”. In this respect, it notes that, according to the Government, it is up to the employers to specify the circumstances other than an accident under which additional hours of work without pay may be performed. The Committee recalls, however, that Article 7(2) of the Convention only allows the granting of temporary exceptions, apart from accidents, in very specific circumstances: in case of urgent work to machinery or plant; in case of force majeure; in order to prevent the loss of perishable goods or avoid endangering the technical results of the work; in order to allow for special work such as stocktaking and the preparation of balance sheets; or in the case of an abnormal pressure of work. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will take measures to limit, in a manner that is in conformity with the Convention, the situations in which employers are authorized to ask their employees to do additional hours of work.

Furthermore, the Committee notes with regret that the Government has not replied to its previous comments on section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to do overtime work if they are employed in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision; to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to cases in which such enterprises have to deal with cases of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances, in so far as the employer cannot ordinarily be expected to resort to other measures; and to stipulate whether legal provisions establish the number of additional hours of work allowed in the day and in the year. Furthermore, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the rate of pay of overtime has to be increased by at least 25 per cent in relation to the regular rate, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to fix rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the statutory minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate once again the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Finally, the Committee notes that the Government mentions in its report that it consults employers’ and workers’ organizations on labour matters at all times. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the consultations previously held which led to the determination of the types of temporary exceptions provided under the Labour Act.

Article 11(2). Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that according to the information provided by the Government in its report under the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1), hours of work are generally stipulated in enterprise rules. It requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 11(3). Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not contain any reply to its previous comments on this point. It requests the Government once again whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside established working hours or during rest periods is considered an offence, as provided by this provision of the Convention.

Article 12. Penalties. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comment, the Government refers to section 173 of the Labour Act. It nevertheless points out that this section only concerns the responsibility of governing bodies of legal entities and does not contain any provision of substance concerning the penalties to be applied for a violation of regulations on working time. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to provide information on the system of penalties to ensure the enforcement of the national legislation on hours of work.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Articles 7 and 8 of the Convention. Permanent and temporary exemptions. The Committee notes that the Labour Act, 2003 does not appear to authorize, or otherwise regulate, work during the weekly rest period neither by reason of standard needs (special weekly rest schemes) nor on grounds of unforeseen circumstances (temporary exemptions). Given the fact that there is a real need to keep certain establishments in operation on the day of rest, which may be inherent (for example in the case of hospitals, hotels, newspapers, continuous processes, transport, etc.) or exceptional (for example in the case of major accidents, force majeure or urgent work to equipment), the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged in order to give full effect to these Articles of the Convention, including the obligation to grant compensatory rest of a total duration of at least 24 hours to those performing work on a weekly rest day.

Article 10(2). Sanctions. The Committee observes that the Labour Act does not appear to provide for specific penalties for failure to apply its provisions on weekly rest. It therefore requests the Government to specify the legal provisions, and transmit a copy of any relevant text, establishing penalties to ensure the enforcement of the standards concerning weekly rest.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous comment, which read as follows:

Repetition

Article 3 of the Convention. Prohibition of night work for women. Further to its previous comment in which the Committee noted that the Labour Act, 2003, no longer gives effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that the Ministry of Manpower, Youth and Employment has been advised of the Committee’s recommendations and will duly examine, in consultation with other competent authorities such as the Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs (MOWAC), the National Labour Commission and the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), the possibility of ratifying the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171).

In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 92–93 of its General Survey of 2001 on the night work of women in industry, in which it noted with concern the large number of member States which opted to no longer apply one of the relevant Conventions, Nos 4, 41 or 89, without however taking any concrete measures under ILO constitutional procedures with a view to formally terminating their obligations arising out of those Conventions. The Committee accordingly insisted that the governments concerned should take the necessary action to remove any contradiction between international treaty obligations, that might have grown outdated over time, and domestic legislation, in the interest of preserving a coherent body of international labour standards and giving full meaning to the Organization’s supervisory organs. For all useful purposes, the Committee recalls that Convention No. 89 may be denounced every ten years and will again be open to denunciation for a period of one year as from 27 February 2021. The Committee therefore once again encourages the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of Convention No. 171. It also requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any decision taken with respect to Convention No. 89.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes the adoption of the regulation issued under the Labour Act (L.I. 1833), which does not, however, contain relevant provisions concerning the application of the Articles of the Convention on which it has been making comments for a number of years.

Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the maximum working hours of task workers is eight hours per day and 40 hours per week. Nonetheless, it recalls that section 44 of the Labour Act provides that section 33, with respect to maximum hours of work, does not apply to task workers. It therefore requests the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work of this category of workers.

Article 2(c). Shift work. The Committee notes with regret that, in reply to its previous comments on this point, the Government has merely reproduced the text of section 36 of the Labour Act. It therefore feels bound to recall that this provision allows the average number of hours worked to be calculated over a maximum period of four weeks in the case of shift work, whereas Article 2(c) of the Convention provides that, for this category of workers, the reference period must not exceed three weeks. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to bring section 36 of the Labour Act into conformity with the Convention. Furthermore, given that section 36 is only applicable if there is an established timetable for the shifts, the Committee requests the Government once again to specify the scope of this provision.

Article 3. Overtime hours – exceptional circumstances. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, section 38 of the Labour Act is in conformity with Article 3 of the Convention. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that this Article of the Convention allows for the maximum hours of work to be exceeded in case of accident, actual or threatened, or in the case of urgent work to be done to machinery or plant, or in the case of force majeure. In this context, it points out that, under the terms of section 38 of the Labour Act, a worker may be required to work beyond the fixed hours of work without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, “including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the undertaking”. However, apart from the case of accidents, this provision does not specify the exceptional circumstances that might justify requiring additional hours of work. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to provide more details on this point, so that it might determine whether, apart from the case of accidents duly mentioned, the exceptional circumstances referred to under section 38 of the Labour Act fulfil the conditions set by Article 3 of the Convention.

Article 5. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes with regret that the Government has merely reproduced, as in its two previous reports, the provisions of section 33 of the Labour Act, under which the maximum working time is eight hours per day and 40 hours per week, except in cases provided for under this Act. It therefore feels bound to reiterate its previous comments on this point. The Committee recalls that section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows for the average number of hours of work to be reckoned over a period of four weeks, without limiting this possibility to exceptional cases in which it is recognized that the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week cannot be applied, as provided in Article 5 of the Convention. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in application of this Article of the Convention is conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, and its approval under regulations adopted by the competent authority, which is not provided for under section 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee requests the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention and to make it conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, approved by the competent authority. It further notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act still allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government once again to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Article 6, paragraphs 1(b) and 2. Temporary exceptions. The Committee notes that, in its report, the Government refers to the provisions of section 35(3)(b) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to work overtime, in particular in cases of emergency, in order to prevent threats against life and property. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that its previous comments on the application of Article 6, paragraphs 1(b) and 2, of the Convention referred to section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers could also be compelled to perform overtime hours if they were employed in enterprises the very nature of which required overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision, to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to exceptional cases of pressure of work and to specify if legislative provisions establish the maximum number of additional hours of work authorized in each case. Finally, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the wage rate for additional hours has to be increased by not less than 25 per cent of the regular wage, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to have fixed rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, hours of work are usually fixed by the rules of each enterprise. It requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 8, paragraph 2. Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not reply to its previous comments on this point. It therefore asks the Government once again to indicate whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside the hours fixed or during rest periods is considered an offence, as stipulated by this provision of the Convention.

Part VI of the report form. The Committee requests the Government to provide general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice by providing, for example, extracts from the reports of the inspection services and, if possible, details on the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of violations recorded with respect to the provisions of the Labour Act concerning hours of work, and on any remedial action taken.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Total and partial exceptions. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Articles 7 and 8 of Convention No. 106.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes the adoption of the regulation issued under the Labour Act (L.I. 1833), but regrets that the Government’s report does not reply in a specific and detailed way to the questions raised by the Committee in its previous comment.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, task workers in commercial establishments are entitled to a limitation of their working time, as well as to rest periods. It nevertheless draws the Government’s attention to the fact that, in accordance with section 44 of the Labour Act, section 33 of this Act with respect to maximum hours of work does not apply to task workers. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the statutory provisions limiting the hours of work for this category of workers.

Articles 6 and 8. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes with regret that the Government has merely reproduced the provisions of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, which allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of four weeks, without limiting this arrangement, as provided under Article 6 of the Convention, to exceptional cases where the circumstances in which the work has to be carried on make the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week inapplicable. Furthermore, the granting of exceptions in accordance with the Articles of the Convention, requires the adoption of regulations made after consultation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, special regard being paid to collective agreements concluded by these organizations. Such regulations are not provided for under article 34(b) of the Labour Act. The Committee asks the Government once again to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act to the cases envisaged by the Convention, and to make them conditional upon regulations made by the competent and national authority, adopted after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned. Furthermore, it requests the Government once again to limit to ten hours the daily working hours for the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, as prescribed by this provision of the Convention. The Government is also asked to indicate whether shift work, covered under section 36 of the Labour Act, is a form of organization of work found in commercial establishments or establishments in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work. The Committee also notes that section 34(c) of the Labour Act allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of one year in enterprises with a seasonal activity, without other conditions. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to bring the introduction of such a scheme averaging hours of work under regulations adopted by the competent national authority, made after consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned.

Article 7, paragraph 2, and Article 8. Temporary exceptions. The Committee notes the Government’s reference in its report to section 38 of the Labour Act, which allows enterprises to require workers to perform additional hours without extra pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including in the case of “an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the enterprise”. In this respect, it notes that, according to the Government, it is up to the employers to specify the circumstances other than an accident under which additional hours of work without pay may be performed. The Committee recalls, however, that Article 7, paragraph 2, of the Convention only allows the granting of temporary exceptions, apart from accidents, in very specific circumstances: in case of urgent work to machinery or plant; in case of force majeure; in order to prevent the loss of perishable goods or avoid endangering the technical results of the work; in order to allow for special work such as stocktaking and the preparation of balance sheets; or in the case of an abnormal pressure of work. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will take measures to limit, in a manner that is in conformity with the Convention, the situations in which employers are authorized to ask their employees to do additional hours of work.

Furthermore, the Committee notes with regret that the Government has not replied to its previous comments on section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, under which workers may be compelled to do overtime work if they are employed in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime in order to be viable. The Committee requests the Government once again to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision; to indicate whether the possibility of demanding workers to do overtime is limited to cases in which such enterprises have to deal with cases of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances, in so far as the employer cannot ordinarily be expected to resort to other measures; and to stipulate whether legal provisions establish the number of additional hours of work allowed in the day and in the year. Furthermore, the Committee draws the Government’s attention once again to the fact that the rate of pay of overtime has to be increased by at least 25 per cent in relation to the regular rate, whereas section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to fix rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the statutory minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate once again the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Finally, the Committee notes that the Government mentions in its report that it consults employers’ and workers’ organizations on labour matters at all times. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the consultations previously held which led to the determination of the types of temporary exceptions provided under the Labour Act.

Article 11, paragraph 2. Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that according to the information provided by the Government in its report under the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1), hours of work are generally stipulated in enterprise rules. It requests the Government to indicate whether, if there are no such provisions in the enterprise rules, employers are bound – and in which manner – to inform their employees of the hours of work. The Government is also asked to specify whether employers are required to keep records of additional hours worked by their employees.

Article 11, paragraph 3. Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not contain any reply to its previous comments on this point. It requests the Government once again whether legal provisions stipulate that employing a person outside established working hours or during rest periods is considered an offence, as provided by this provision of the Convention.

Article 12. Penalties. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comment, the Government refers to section 173 of the Labour Act. It nevertheless points out that this section only concerns the responsibility of governing bodies of legal entities and does not contain any provision of substance concerning the penalties to be applied for a violation of regulations on working time. The Committee therefore requests the Government once again to provide information on the system of penalties to ensure the enforcement of the national legislation on hours of work.

Part V of the report form. The Committee requests the Government to provide general information on the way in which the Convention is applied in practice, by giving, for example, extracts from reports of the inspection services and, if possible, details on the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of the violations of the provisions of the Labour Act pertaining to working time, and any remedial action taken.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Articles 7 and 8 of the Convention. Permanent and temporary exemptions. The Committee notes that the Labour Act, 2003 does not appear to authorize, or otherwise regulate, work during the weekly rest period neither by reason of standard needs (special weekly rest schemes) nor on grounds of unforeseen circumstances (temporary exemptions). Given the fact that there is a real need to keep certain establishments in operation on the day of rest, which may be inherent (for example in the case of hospitals, hotels, newspapers, continuous processes, transport, etc.) or exceptional (for example in the case of major accidents, force majeure or urgent work to equipment), the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged in order to give full effect to these Articles of the Convention, including the obligation to grant compensatory rest of a total duration of at least 24 hours to those performing work on a weekly rest day.

Article 10, paragraph 2. Sanctions. The Committee observes that the Labour Act does not appear to provide for specific penalties for failure to apply its provisions on weekly rest. It therefore requests the Government to specify the legal provisions, and transmit a copy of any relevant text, establishing penalties to ensure the enforcement of the standards concerning weekly rest.

Part V of the report form. The Committee notes the general statistical information contained in the Government’s report. It would be grateful if the Government would provide in its next report more detailed information on the practical application of the Convention, including, for instance, the approximate number of workers covered by the relevant legislation, labour inspection results showing the number of infringements of the legislation on weekly rest observed and sanctions imposed, copies of collective agreements containing clauses on special weekly rest schemes, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Article 3 of the Convention. Prohibition of night work for women. Further to its previous comment in which the Committee noted that the new Labour Act, 2003 no longer gives effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indications that the Ministry of Manpower, Youth and Employment has been advised of the Committee’s recommendations and will duly examine, in consultation with other competent authorities such as the Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs (MOWAC), the National Labour Commission and the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), the possibility of ratifying the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171).

In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 92–93 of its General Survey of 2001 on the night work of women in industry, in which it noted with concern the large number of member States which opted to no longer apply one of the relevant Conventions Nos 4, 41 or 89 without however taking any concrete measures under ILO constitutional procedures with a view to formally terminating their obligations arising out of those Conventions. The Committee accordingly insisted that the governments concerned should take the necessary action to remove any contradiction between international treaty obligations, that might had grown outdated over time, and domestic legislation in the interest of preserving a coherent body of international labour standards and giving full meaning to the Organization’s supervisory organs. For all useful purposes, the Committee recalls that Convention No. 89 may be denounced every ten years and will again be open to denunciation for a period of one year as from 27 February 2011. The Committee therefore once again encourages the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of Convention No. 171. It also requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any decision taken with respect to Convention No. 89.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

The Committee notes the Government’s report which limits itself to reproducing the report submitted in 2004. It also notes that the Labour Act of 8 October 2003 (Act No. 651) came into force on 31 March 2004. The Committee requests the Government to respond to the issues raised in its previous comments concerning compliance with Articles 2 (application of the Labour Act to task workers and the working hours of shift workers), 3 (additional hours worked), 5 (average number of hours worked), 6 (temporary exceptions) and 8 (notification of working hours and recording of additional hours worked) of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to communicate to the Office a copy of the implementing regulations of the Labour Act, as soon as they have been adopted.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the adoption of the Labour Act of 8 October 2003 (Act No. 651). It requests the Government to indicate the date of entry into force of the Act and to provide the Office with a copy of its implementing regulations as soon as they have been adopted. Furthermore, the Committee would be grateful to be provided with fuller information on the following points.

Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that under the terms of section 1, the Labour Act applies to all workers and employers (except the Armed Forces, the Police Service, the Prison Service and the Security and Intelligence Agencies). However, section 44 of the Act provides that sections 33, 34 and 40 to 43, with respect to maximum hours of work and rest periods, do not apply to task workers. These workers are defined in section 175 of the Act as persons who perform a piece of work for a fee. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any provisions as to hours of work applicable to task workers and their application in practice.

Weekly hours of work. The Committee notes with interest that the new Labour Act reduces the statutory weekly hours of work from 45 to 40 hours.

Shift work. The Committee notes that, in the context of shift work, section 36 of the Labour Act allows the average number of hours worked to be calculated over a period of four weeks or less, whereas Article 2(c) of the Convention provides that the reference period must not exceed three weeks. As the Committee emphasized in its General Survey of 2005 on hours of work (paragraph 106), "the effect of the exception is to allow greater elasticity in the changing of shifts, without increasing the working hours averaged over a period of three weeks or less". The use of a reference period of three weeks is sufficient, in the context of work involving three successive shift teams, to reconcile the average daily and weekly hours of work and the changing of shifts. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 36 of the Labour Act into conformity with the Convention on this point. It also notes that, under the terms of section 36 of the Labour Act, this provision is only applicable if there is an established timetable for the shifts. The Committee requests the Government to clarify the meaning of this expression so that it can assess its scope.

Article 3. Overtime hours - exceptional circumstances. The Committee notes that, under the terms of section 38 of the Labour Act, a worker may be required to work beyond the fixed hours of work without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the undertaking. It requests the Government to specify the circumstances other than an accident in which this provision may be applied.

Article 5. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes that section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows for the average number of hours of work to be reckoned over a period of four weeks, without limiting this possibility to exceptional cases in which it is recognized that the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week cannot be applied, as provided in Article 5 of the Convention. Furthermore, the implementation of this provision does not require the conclusion of an agreement between workers’ and employers’ organizations given the force of regulations by decision of the competent authority. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to restrict the application of this provision to the cases envisaged by the Convention and to make it conditional upon the conclusion of an agreement between employers’ and workers’ organizations, approved by the competent authority. The Committee also notes that this latter condition is not envisaged in section 34(c) of the Labour Act, under which the average number of hours of work may be reckoned over a period of one year in the case of enterprises of which the work is of a seasonal nature. It requests the Government to ensure that such an exception is only authorized when an agreement has been concluded between employers’ and workers’ organizations, and has been given the force of regulations by the competent authority.

Article 6, paragraphs 1(b) and 2. Temporary exceptions. The Committee notes that, under section 35(3)(a) of the Labour Act, workers may be compelled to perform overtime hours if they are employed in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime in order to be viable. It requests the Government to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision. The Government is also requested to indicate whether, as required by the Convention, legislative measures limit the authorization of additional hours to cases in which such enterprises have to deal with exceptional cases of pressure of work and determine the maximum number of additional hours authorized in each instance. Finally, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that the wage rate for additional hours has to be increased by not less than 25 per cent of the regular rate. However, it notes that section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the enterprise has to have fixed rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the statutory minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Article 8, paragraph 1. Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that, under section 39 of the Labour Act, the hours at which work begins and ends have to be fixed by the rules of each enterprise. It requests the Government to provide additional information on the manner in which employers meet their obligation to notify hours of work to workers, for example, by providing them with a copy of the enterprise rules. The Government is also requested to indicate whether employers are legally required to keep records of additional hours worked. In this respect, the Committee notes that, according to the information provided by the Government in its report on Convention No. 30, the information required in accordance with Article 8, paragraph 1, of the Convention is contained in collective agreements. The Government refers to section 98 of the Labour Act, under which a sectoral collective agreement may include provisions on, among other matters, the conditions of work, including the hours of work, rest periods, meal breaks, etc. The Committee wishes to emphasize that the existence of sectoral collective agreements is not sufficient to ensure compliance with this provision in relation to all the workers covered by the Convention. Moreover, section 98, referred to above, does not require the inclusion of such provisions in collective agreements but merely provides for this possibility.

Article 8, paragraph 2. Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee recalls that under this provision of the Convention it must be made an offence against the law to employ any person outside the hours fixed or during rest intervals. It requests the Government to indicate the legal provisions which give effect to this rule.

Part VI of the report form. The Committee notes with interest that, according to the information provided by the Government in its report on Convention No. 30, a training workshop was organized in September 2004 for labour inspectors to familiarize them with the new Labour Act and ensure its effective enforcement. It also notes that in 2003 inspections were carried out in 254 establishments employing 8,196 workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide, where possible, data on the number and nature of the contraventions reported during these inspections and to continue providing information of a general nature on the effect given to the Convention in practice.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the adoption of the Labour Act of 8 October 2003 (Act No. 651). It requests the Government to indicate its date of entry into force and to transmit a copy of its implementing regulations to the Office as soon as they have been adopted. Furthermore, the Committee would be grateful to be provided with fuller information on the following points.

Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that under the terms of section 1, the new Labour Act applies to all workers and employers (with the exception of the armed forces, the police service, the prison service and the security and intelligence agencies). However, under the terms of section 44, the section of the Labour Act relating to rest periods, including section 42 on the weekly rest period, is not applicable to task workers. These workers are defined in section 175 as persons who perform a piece of work for a fee. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the whole of the staff employed in any industrial undertaking, public or private, or in any branch thereof must enjoy a period of weekly rest of at least 24 consecutive hours. Consequently, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the Convention is applied with regard to task workers employed in industrial establishments.

Part V of the report form. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide general indications on the way in which the Convention is applied in practice providing, for example, extracts from inspection services reports and information on the number of workers protected by the legislation, the number and nature of contraventions reported, etc.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the adoption of the Labour Act of 8 October 2003 (Act No. 651). It requests the Government to indicate the date of entry into force of the Act and to provide the Office with a copy of its implementing regulations as soon as they have been adopted. The Committee would also be grateful to be provided with fuller information on the following points.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that, under the terms of section 1, the Labour Act applies to all workers and to all employers (except the Armed Forces, the Police Service, the Prison Service and the Security and Intelligence Agencies). However, section 44 of the Act provides that sections 33, 34 and 40 to 43, with respect to maximum hours of work and rest periods, do not apply to task workers, who are defined in section 175 of the Act as persons who perform a piece of work for a fee. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether certain workers employed in commercial establishments or establishments in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work are paid on a piecework basis. If so, the Government is requested to provide information on any provisions as to hours of work applicable to task workers, and their application in practice.

Article 3. Weekly hours of work. The Committee notes with interest that the new Labour Act reduces the statutory weekly hours of work from 45 to 40 hours.

Article 6. Averaging of hours of work. The Committee notes that section 34(b) of the Labour Act allows for the averaging of hours of work over a period of four weeks, without limiting this possibility to exceptional cases where the circumstances in which the work has to be carried out make the limits of eight hours in the day and 48 hours in the week inapplicable. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to limit the application of this provision to the cases envisaged by the Convention. It also requests the Government to limit to ten hours the daily working hours for the application of section 34(b) of the Labour Act, as prescribed by the Convention. The Committee further notes that, in the context of shift work, section 36 of the Labour Act permits the averaging of hours of work over a period of four weeks or less. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether this form of organization of work is found in commercial establishments or establishments in which the persons employed are mainly engaged in office work.

Article 7, paragraph 2(a). Temporary exceptions - Exceptional circumstances. The Committee notes that, under section 38 of the Labour Act, workers may be required to perform additional hours without additional pay in certain exceptional circumstances, including an accident threatening human lives or the very existence of the enterprise. It requests the Government to specify the circumstances other than an accident in which this provision may be applied.

Article 7, paragraphs 2(d), 3 and 4. Temporary exceptions - Abnormal pressure of work. The Committee notes that, under section 35, subsection 3(a), of the Labour Act, workers may be compelled to do overtime work if they are employed in enterprises the very nature of which requires overtime in order to be viable. It requests the Government to provide information on the enterprises covered by this provision. The Government is also requested to indicate whether, as required by the Convention, legislative measures limit the authorization of overtime hours to cases in which such enterprises have to deal with cases of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances, in so far as the employer cannot ordinarily be expected to resort to other measures, and whether the number of additional hours of work which may be allowed in the day and in the year has been determined. Finally, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that the rate of pay for overtime has to be increased by at least 25 per cent in relation to the regular rate. However, it notes that section 35(2) of the Labour Act only provides that the undertaking has to fix rates of pay for overtime work, without establishing the statutory minimum rate. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure compliance with the increased rate of pay prescribed by the Convention.

Article 8. Consultation with workers’ and employers’ organizations. The Committee notes that the Labour Act makes provisions for those exceptions allowed under Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention. However, the Government has not indicated the manner in which the consultation of workers’ and employers’ organizations is ensured in this respect. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether such consultations are held in practice.

Article 11, paragraph 2. Posting of hours of work and record of additional hours. The Committee notes that, under section 39 of the Labour Act, the hours at which work begins and ends must be fixed by the rules of each enterprise. It requests the Government to provide additional information on the manner in which employers meet their obligation to notify hours of work and rest periods to workers, for example, by providing them with a copy of the enterprise rules. The Government is also requested to indicate whether employers are legally obliged to keep records of additional hours worked. In this respect, the Committee notes that, according to the information provided by the Government in its report, the information required by Article 11, paragraph 2, of the Convention is contained in collective agreements. The Government refers to section 98 of the Labour Act, under which a sectoral collective agreement may include provisions on, among other matters, the conditions of work, including the hours of work, rest periods, meal breaks, etc. The Committee wishes to emphasize that the existence of sectoral collective agreements is not sufficient to ensure compliance with this provision in relation to all the workers covered by the Convention. Moreover, section 98, referred to above, does not require the inclusion of such provisions in collective agreements but merely provides for this possibility.

Article 11, paragraph 3. Employment of a person outside the hours fixed. The Committee recalls that, under this provision of the Convention, it must be made an offence to employ any person outside the hours fixed or during rest periods. It requests the Government to indicate the legal provisions which give effect to this rule.

Article 12. Penalties. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the penalties established to ensure the enforcement of the provisions of the national legislation on hours of work, as envisaged in the Convention.

Part V of the report form. The Committee notes with interest that a training workshop was organized in September 2004 for labour inspectors to familiarize them with the new Labour Act and to ensure its effective enforcement. It also notes that in 2003 inspections were carried out in 254 establishments employing 8,196 workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide, where possible, data on the number and nature of the contraventions reported during these inspections and to continue providing information of a general nature on the effect given to the Convention in practice.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes the adoption of the Labour Act of 8 October 2003 (Act No. 651). It requests the Government to indicate its date of entry into force and to transmit to the Office a copy of its implementing rules as soon as they have been adopted. Furthermore, the Committee would be grateful to be provided with fuller information on the following points.

Article 1 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes that under the terms of section 1, the new Labour Act applies to all workers and employers (with the exception of the armed forces, the police service, the prison service and the security and intelligence agencies). However, under the terms of section 44, the section of the Labour Act relating to rest periods, including section 42 on the weekly rest period, is not applicable to task workers. These workers are defined in section 175 as persons who perform a piece of work for a fee. The Committee requests the Government to state whether certain workers employed in commercial establishments, or establishments whose staff primarily carry out office work, are remunerated as task workers. Should this be the case, the Government is invited to indicate the way in which it ensures that the Convention is applied to these workers.

Part V of the report form. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide general indications on the way in which the Convention is applied in practice providing, for example, extracts from inspection services reports, information on the number of workers protected by the relevant legislation, the number and nature of contraventions reported, etc.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

The Committee recalls that for several years it has been drawing the Government’s attention to the inconsistencies between certain provisions of its national legislation and the requirements of the Convention, in particular as regards the possibility of suspending the prohibition of night work for women. In its reply, the Government states that measures have been taken to address the Committee’s concerns and refers to draft new labour legislation which is designed to ensure the overall conformity with the Convention. In fact, the Committee notes that the Labour Act, 2003, has in the meantime been enacted and entered into force. It also notes that the general prohibition of night work for women has now been removed and that under section 55(1)(a) of the new Labour Act it would only be prohibited to assign or employ pregnant women workers to do any night work without their consent between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Committee is bound therefore to conclude that following the adoption of the new Labour Act, the Convention has for all practical purposes ceased to apply.

In this connection, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraphs 191 to 202 of the 2001 General Survey on the night work of women in industry in which it concluded that there can be no doubt that the present trend is clearly in support of lifting all restrictions on women’s night work and formulating gender-sensitive night work regulations offering safety and health protection to both men and women. It also noted that many countries are in the process of easing or eliminating legal restrictions on women’s employment during the night with the aim of improving women’s opportunities in employment and strengthening non-discrimination. The Committee recalled that member States are under an obligation to periodically review their protective legislation in the light of scientific and technological knowledge with a view to revising all gender-specific provisions and discriminatory constraints. This obligation stems from article 11(3) of the 1979 UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (to which parenthetically Ghana became a party in 1986) as later reaffirmed in point 5(b) of the 1985 ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment. The Committee further indicated that the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), was drafted for those countries which would be prepared to eliminate all women-specific restrictions on night work (except for those aimed at protecting women’s reproductive and infant nursing role) while seeking to improve the working and living conditions of all night workers.

Considering, therefore, that the Convention no longer applies in either law or practice, and also recalling the need for an appropriate legal framework addressing the problems and hazards of night work in general, the Committee once again invites the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), which shifts the emphasis from a specific category of workers and sector of economic activity to the safety and health protection of night workers irrespective of gender in nearly all branches and occupations. The Committee asks the Government to keep it informed of any decision taken in this regard.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s latest report, on the period ending June 1999. It recalls that for many years its comments have related to the need to give effect to Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention by amending sections 50 and 53 of Labour Decree No. 342 of 3 April 1969. Already in 1989, the Committee noted in a direct request that the Labour Advisory Committee had proposed to the Government an amendment of the 1969 Decree to this effect. The Committee regrets that no progress has been made since then and that the Government has merely indicated in its successive reports that the review procedure is proceeding. The Committee trusts that the draft codification of national labour legislation mentioned in the Government’s latest report will be adopted very shortly and that copies of the texts relating to application of the Convention will be transmitted to the ILO as soon as possible.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to its previous comments. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:

In its previous comments, the Committee had noted the need to amend section 41(1a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the provisions of the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of women’s night work when work is interrupted by reason of a strike.

The Committee notes with regret that no progress was made in this respect. The Government reiterates in its report that the National Advisory Committee on Labour has addressed the issue and has recommended the deletion of the word "strike" in the above-cited section of the Labour Decree.

The Committee also notes the Government’s statement that the new Labour Code, which is now under consideration with a view to synchronizing the provisions of labour laws with international labour standards, is expected to reflect the suggested amendment. However, the Committee notes that according to article 78(1a) of the draft Labour Act, 2000, the general prohibition of night work for women would appear to have been lifted, except for pregnant women workers who may not be assigned to night work without their consent between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

The Committee hopes that the necessary measures will be adopted without further delay to ensure that the discrepancy to which the Committee has been drawing attention for 30 years is eliminated. It requests the Government to provide information in its next report on the progress achieved in this regard.

The Committee takes this opportunity to invite the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of either the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), or the Protocol of 1990 to Convention No. 89.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

The Committee notes the Government’s latest report, on the period ending June 1999. It recalls that for many years its comments have related to the need to give effect to Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention by amending sections 50 and 53 of Labour Decree No. 342 of 3 April 1969. Already in 1989, the Committee noted in a direct request that the Labour Advisory Committee had proposed to the Government an amendment of the 1969 Decree to this effect. The Committee regrets that no progress has been made since then and that the Government has merely indicated in its successive reports that the review procedure is proceeding. The Committee trusts that the draft codification of national labour legislation mentioned in the Government’s latest report will be adopted very shortly and that copies of the texts relating to application of the Convention will be transmitted to the ILO as soon as possible.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

The Committee notes the information supplied in the Government’s reports. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted the need to amend section 41(1a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the provisions of the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of women’s night work when work is interrupted by reason of a strike.

The Committee notes with regret that no progress was made in this respect. The Government reiterates in its report that the National Advisory Committee on Labour has addressed the issue and has recommended the deletion of the word "strike" in the above-cited section of the Labour Decree.

The Committee also notes the Government’s statement that the new Labour Code, which is now under consideration with a view to synchronizing the provisions of labour laws with international labour standards, is expected to reflect the suggested amendment. However, the Committee notes that according to article 78(1a) of the draft Labour Act, 2000, the general prohibition of night work for women would appear to have been lifted, except for pregnant women workers who may not be assigned to night work without their consent between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

The Committee hopes that the necessary measures will be adopted without further delay to ensure that the discrepancy to which the Committee has been drawing attention for 30 years is eliminated. It requests the Government to provide information in its next report on the progress achieved in this regard.

The Committee takes this opportunity to invite the Government to give favourable consideration to the ratification of either the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), or the Protocol of 1990 to Convention No. 89.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 4(a) of the Convention. In its previous observations, the Committee had reiterated the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. The Government states, in its report, that the issue has been referred to the tripartite National Advisory Committee on Labour and it hopes that the Committee which is presently addressing other equally important issues would appropriately tackle the issue with the view of amending the offending provision of the law.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future and requests it to indicate any progress achieved in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1998, published 87th ILC session (1999)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government's report for the period ending June 1993 and the draft amendment of articles 50 and 53 of the Labour Regulations attached to the report.

It notes in particular that pursuant to its previous comments the Government intends with these amendments to bring the national legislation into full conformity with Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention. The Committee trusts that the new texts will be adopted shortly; it would be grateful if the Government would inform the ILO of this immediately and send it copies of the final texts.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1996, published 85th ILC session (1997)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report.

Article 4(a) of the Convention. In its previous observations, the Committee had reiterated the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. The Government states, in its report, that the issue has been referred to the tripartite National Advisory Committee on Labour and it hopes that the Committee which is presently addressing other equally important issues would appropriately tackle the issue with the view of amending the offending provision of the law.

The Committee notes this information and hopes that the Government would indicate any progress achieved in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 83rd ILC session (1996)

The Committee notes the Government's report for the period ending June 1993 and the draft amendment of articles 50 and 53 of the Labour Regulations attached to the report.

It notes in particular that pursuant to its previous comments the Government intends with these amendments to bring the national legislation into full conformity with Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention. The Committee trusts that the new texts will be adopted shortly; it would be grateful if the Government would inform the ILO of this immediately and send it copies of the final texts.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 4(a) of the Convention. The Committee referred to its previous comments which it has reiterated for several years concerning the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. The Committee noted that the necessary steps have still not been taken to bring the legislation into conformity with the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee takes note of the information supplied in the Government's report and by a Government representative to the Conference Committee in June 1989. Further to its previous comments, it notes with interest that the National Advisory Committee, reconstituted in 1989, has submitted a memorandum to the Labour Minister proposing that sections 50 and 53 of the Labour Regulations of 1969 be amended to bring them into conformity with Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention.

The Committee trusts that the appropriate amendments to the legislation will be adopted in the near future and that they will ensure that full effect is given to the Convention. It requests the Government to supply the International Labour Office with a copy of the new provisions in due course.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation:

Article 4(a) of the Convention. The Committee referred to its previous comments which it has reiterated for several years concerning the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. The Committee noted that the necessary steps have still not been taken to bring the legislation into conformity with the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee takes note of the information supplied in the Government's report and by a Government representative to the Conference Committee in June 1989. Further to its previous comments, it notes with interest that the National Advisory Committee, reconstituted in 1989, has submitted a memorandum to the Labour Minister proposing that sections 50 and 53 of the Labour Regulations of 1969 be amended to bring them into conformity with Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention.

The Committee trusts that the appropriate amendments to the legislation will be adopted in the near future and that they will ensure that full effect is given to the Convention. It requests the Government to supply the International Labour Office with a copy of the new provisions in due course.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

Article 4(a) of the Convention. The Committee refers to its previous comments which it has reiterated for several years concerning the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. The Committee notes that the necessary steps have still not been taken to bring the legislation into conformity with the Convention. It trusts that the Government will shortly be able to report progress in this respect.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

Article 4(a) of the Convention. The Committee refers to its previous comments concerning the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. It recalls that this question has been the subject of its comments for several years. It notes from the Government's last report that the National Advisory Committee on Labour will examine the possibility of amending the legislation in question in order to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. The Committee hopes that the necessary measures will be taken in the near future and requests the Government to report any progress accomplished in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

The Committee takes note of the information supplied in the Government's report and by a Government representative to the Conference Committee in June 1989. Further to its previous comments, it notes with interest that the National Advisory Committee, reconstituted in 1989, has submitted a memorandum to the Labour Minister proposing that sections 50 and 53 of the Labour Regulations of 1969 be amended to bring them into conformity with Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention.

The Committee trusts that the appropriate amendments to the legislation will be adopted in the near future and that they will ensure that full effect is given to the Convention. It requests the Government to supply the International Labour Office with a copy of the new provisions in due course.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 4(a) of the Convention. The Committee refers to its previous comments concerning the need to amend section 41(2)(a) of the Labour Decree of 1967 which, contrary to the Convention, permits the suspension of the prohibition of night work by women when work is interrupted by reason of a strike. It recalls that this question has been the subject of comments for several years. It hopes that the necessary measures will be adopted in the near future to ensure the conformity of the legislation with these provisions of the Convention, and requests the Government to report any progress accomplished in this respect.