ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2025, published 114th ILC session (2026)

Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) - Bangladesh (Ratification: 1972)
Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 - Bangladesh (Ratification: 2022)

Other comments on C029

Direct Request
  1. 2025
  2. 2021
  3. 2017
  4. 2014
  5. 1994
  6. 1990

Display in: French - SpanishView all

Articles 1(1) and 2(1) of the Convention. Restrictions on freedom of workers to terminate employment. For many years, the Committee has been referring to certain provisions of the Essential Services (Maintenance) Act No. LIII, 1952, and the Essential Services (Second) Ordinance No. XLI, 1958, which impose restrictions on termination of employment by any person employed by the central Government and in essential services, punishable with sanctions of imprisonment. It noted the Government’s information that the above Acts entitle the Government to restrict the sudden termination of the labour relation with an employee only if he/she is engaged in such employment or class of employment which is deemed as essential to the Government, aimed at ensuring the delivery of certain services, which if obstructed would affect the normal life of the people. However, the Committee observed that section 5 of the Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952, and section 4 of the Essential Services (Second) Ordinance No. XLI, 1958, prohibit the termination of employment by workers in essential services without the previous consent of the employer, even if a notice has been given. The Government indicated that the above provisions were never used in practice.
The Committee once again notes the Government’s reference in its report to section 27 of the Labour Act, 2006 which ensures the freedom for all workers to terminate their employment with notice. Referring to paragraph 290 of the 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, the Committee once again recalls, that without being limited to cases of emergency within the meaning of Article 2(2)(d) of the Convention, statutory provisions depriving workers of the right to terminate their employment by giving notice of reasonable length are incompatible with the Convention. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to formally repeal section 5 of the Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952, and section 4 of the Essential Services (Second) Ordinance No. XLI, 1958, so as to bring the national legislation into conformity with the Convention and the indicated practice, and thereby ensuring legal certainty.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer