|
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 4543 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges her performance evaluation for 2016. |
| 4542 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges her performance evaluation during her probationary period. |
| 4541 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision not to notify her of the outcome of the investigation into her internal complaint of moral harassment, the decision not to send her the full report drawn up following that investigation, and the decision not to inform her of the outcome of her internal complaint. |
| 4540 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges her dismissal as a result of disciplinary proceedings. |
| 4539 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate him from service on 31 October 2018, being the date on which he reached his retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4538 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 30 September 2018, being the date on which she reached her retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4537 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 31 July 2018, being the date on which she reached her retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4536 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate him from service on 31 October 2018, being the date on which he reached the mandatory age of retirement of 62 according to the Staff Rules then in force. |
| 4535 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate him from service on 31 October 2018, being the date on which he reached his retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4534 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, a former staff member of UNAIDS, challenges the decision to separate him from service on 31 October 2018, being the date on which he reached his retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4533 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 31 December 2018, being the date on which she reached her retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of her appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4532 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 22 November 2018, after having reached the end of the extension period previously granted beyond the mandatory age of retirement of 62 according to the Staff Rules then in force. |
| 4531 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 31 August 2018, being the date on which she reached her retirement age according to the Staff Rules then in force, as well as the decision not to approve an exceptional extension of her appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 4530 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the effective date of termination of his appointment, which had previously been deferred on a number of occasions due to his sick leave. |
| 4529 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests WHO’s decision to select Ms V. for the post of Proofreader (Spanish), at grade G-4, in WHO’s Headquarters’ Word Processing Centre. |
| 4528 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to separate her from service on 31 December 2018, being the date on which she reached the mandatory age of retirement of 62 according to the Staff Rules then in force. |
| 4527 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants impugn WHO’s decision to postpone implementation of the mandatory age of separation adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in Resolution 70/244 of 23 December 2015. |
| 4526 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to terminate his contract for misconduct. |
| 4525 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the refusal of his request to be awarded monetary compensation for the material and moral injury he allegedly sustained as a consequence of the IAEA’s failure to investigate allegations of harassment made against him. |
| 4524 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to appoint, as a development reassignment, Ms V.M. to the post of Client Relationship Manager. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >
|
