|
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 3303 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The application for review of Judgment 2990 is rejected in accordance with Article 7 of the Tribunal’s Rules. |
| 3302 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints were dismissed for non-exhaustion of internal remedies under Article 7 of the Tribunal’s Rules. |
| 3301 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant through five irreceivable complaints requested information concerning facts that occurred before his retirement for disability. |
| 3300 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismissed the complaint filed against the decision not to consider the complainant's disability as resulting from an occupational disease. |
| 3299 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully impugns a decision to keep in her personal file a warning letter and the non-renewal of her contract. |
| 3298 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants contest the conditions of their reassignment and allege unequal treatment. |
| 3297 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant was dismissed for misconduct following a disciplinary investigation, which found that he had forged and falsified documents. |
| 3296 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant alleges that he has been harassed and that he was appointed only in 2006 to a post whose functions he had been fulfilling since 2001. |
| 3295 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaint concerning a disciplinary measure was dismissed by the Tribunal on the grounds that he had not demonstrated the existence of an error warranting the cancellation of the sanction. |
| 3294 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the decision to refuse to reclassify one of her former posts. |
| 3293 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the amount of the reinstallation allowance which was granted to him. |
| 3292 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the decision not to grant him a reinstallation allowance. |
| 3291 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismisses fifty-six similar complaints on the grounds that they are directed against general and not individual decisions. |
| 3290 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | Following the abolition of the complainant's post for lack of financial resources, the reassignment process was organized but was ultimately unsuccessful in finding the complainant another post. |
| 3289 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant received a written censure for failing to comply with the procedure of authorizing outside activities and remuneration. |
| 3288 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant unsuccessfully challenges a recruitment process. |
| 3287 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, who reported his suspicions that someone was unlwafully accessing his professional email account, impugned the decision to deny him access to the investigation report. |
| 3286 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | Non-extension of a fixed-term contract. Failure to investigate allegations of harassment. |
| 3285 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | In his first complaint, the complainant impugns the decision denying him an extension of employment beyond the age of 65. By his second complaint, he seeks to challenge the appointment of his successor. |
| 3284 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to conduct a review of the grade assigned to his post. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >
|
