ILO is a specialised agency of the United Nations
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >

Judgment No. Session No. Full text
3283 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant challenged the decision not to promote him earlier to grade A3.
3282 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to renew his contract based on an "overall assessment" that his performance was below the acceptable level.
3281 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
Tax refunds due as a result of tax credits.
3280 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant requests that the 2010 promotion exercise, which was allegedly cancelled for budgetary reasons, be held.
3279 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complaints regarding the classification of the complainants’ duties following an administrative reform were dismissed by the Tribunal.
3278 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant unsuccessfully impugns the decision confirming the classification of his employment in a new grade bracket.
3277 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant unsuccessfully challenges the classification of her employment in a new grade bracket following an administrative reform.
3276 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainants unsuccessfully impugn the reclassification of their posts following the reform of the Staff Regulations, which allegedly deprives them of any career advancement.
3275 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainants challenge the reclassification of their posts as inadequate, not equivalent to their former positions and depriving them of any career advancement.
3274 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complaint about a post reclassification resulting from an administrative reform was dismissed by the Tribunal.
3273 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant challenges the decision to place his post in a certain grade group following an allegedly flawed assessment process.
3272 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant successfully challenges the decision not to appoint her to a vacant post due to procedural flaw and violation of her right to due process.
3271 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The application for interpretation of Judgment 2938 is rejected by the Tribunal, while the application for execution of the same judgment is allowed.
3270 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant challenges the date on which her classification in grade G5 took effect.
3269 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant alleges that she was submitted to harassment and denounces flaws in the inquiry relating to her harassment allegations.
3268 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant successfully impugns the establishment of a staff report containing negative comments.
3267 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant impugned the decision not to waive the time limit for lodging an internal appeal, claiming that his heavy workload constituted an exceptional circumstance justifying the grant of a waiver.
3266 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to promote him on the ground that the standard used was too demanding (exceptional performance).
3265 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant having been allowed to contribute again at the full rate to the pension scheme, the Tribunal need not rule on his complaint seeking the cancellation of the decision to lower the contribution rate.
3264 116th Session, 2014 EN, FR
 
The complainant successfully impugns the decision not to renew her contract after an extension of her probationary period and is granted damages.

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262 | next >


 
Last updated: 08.06.2026 ^ top