Decision quashed (124, 125, 126, 842, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Decision quashed
Total judgments found: 402

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 | next >

• Judgment 5163

  
  141st Session, 2026
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant, as a staff union representative and Vice-President of the Staff Committee, contests the decision to use external suppliers and cancel an ongoing recruitment process for regular staff for the functions thus outsourced.

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  [L]e Tribunal considère, en tout état de cause, que l’annulation des décisions du Directeur général du 27 octobre 2020 et du 15 décembre 2022, pour les motifs ci-dessus évoqués, suffit, en soi, à réparer le préjudice moral que pourrait avoir subi le syndicat que le requérant représente (voir, par exemple, les jugements 4575, au considérant 9, et 4551, au considérant 16).

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 4551, 4575
  

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; moral injury;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5055

  
  140th Session, 2025
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: Le requérant conteste la décision de renvoi sans préavis dont il a fait l’objet.

  Considerations 5-6

  Extract:

  Le Tribunal considère qu’il ressort de l’ensemble des dispositions [applicables], telles qu’elles sont conçues, qu’un examen préalable de toute allégation de faute par le DIR/IOS et une enquête officielle par l’unité d’investigation de ce service sont requis avant que la Directrice générale ne puisse décider d’ouvrir une procédure disciplinaire. L’intervention d’un service autonome chargé de donner un avis en toute indépendance quant au caractère établi et, le cas échéant, fautif des faits reprochés au fonctionnaire apparaît en effet comme une garantie essentielle reconnue à tout membre du personnel visé par des allégations de faute.
  Le Tribunal relève du reste, que, comme le fait valoir à juste titre le requérant, le paragraphe 16 du point 11.3 du Manuel RH prévoit qu’une copie du rapport d’enquête doit être annexée à la lettre de notification des charges, ce qui confirme le caractère obligatoire de l’enquête.
  Il s’ensuit que l’absence d’intervention de l’IOS dans la phase préalable à l’ouverture de la procédure disciplinaire proprement dite a entaché cette dernière d’un vice de procédure substantiel qui justifie, à lui seul, l’annulation de la décision attaquée.
  Il résulte de ce qui précède que la décision de la Directrice générale du 3 juillet 2023 ainsi que celle du 25 mars 2020 doivent être annulées, sans qu’il soit besoin de se prononcer sur les autres moyens de la requête.

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; investigation; procedural flaw;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5054

  
  140th Session, 2025
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: Le requérant conteste la décision de le réaffecter dans un bureau hors Siège de l’Organisation.

  Consideration 13

  Extract:

  Les vices constatés aux considérants 5 à 12 ci-dessus, qui relèvent du contrôle restreint exercé par le Tribunal en la matière, suffisent à justifier la censure de la décision de réaffecter le requérant au Bureau régional de Kingston.
  Il en résulte que la décision attaquée du 7 août 2023 ainsi que la décision du 6 janvier 2020 doivent être annulées.

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; judicial review; transfer;
  

  Consideration 14

  Extract:

  [L]e Tribunal relève que le requérant reste en défaut d’expliciter dans sa requête l’existence du préjudice moral qu’il prétend avoir subi du seul fait de la décision de le réaffecter au Bureau de Kingston. Dans les circonstances très particulières de l’espèce, où la réaffectation en question n’a jamais connu de matérialisation effective et où, de surcroît, le requérant a fait preuve d’un comportement manifestement peu coopératif à l’égard de l’Organisation, le Tribunal considère que la simple constatation de l’illégalité de la décision attaquée suffit à réparer l’éventuel préjudice moral qu’aurait subi l’intéressé du fait de cette décision.
  Il n’y a donc pas lieu de lui accorder de dommages-intérêts à ce titre.

  Keywords:

  compensation; decision quashed; moral injury; transfer;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5017

  
  140th Session, 2025
  International Criminal Police Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: La requérante considère avoir été privée de ses fonctions par suite d’une restructuration et demande réparation du préjudice qu’elle estime avoir subi en raison de ce qu’elle estime être une résiliation de facto de son engagement.

  Consideration 13

  Extract:

  [L]a requérante met en doute, en premier lieu, le respect du délai […] dans lequel le Secrétaire général doit saisir la Commission mixte de recours. Mais, outre que l’intéressée ne soutient même pas formellement dans ses écritures que ce délai aurait été méconnu, le Tribunal relève que ce grief ne saurait, en tout état de cause, constituer une erreur substantielle de nature à vicier la régularité de la procédure suivie. En effet, des délais de cette nature ne sont pas prescrits à peine de nullité de la décision rendue après leur expiration et leur éventuelle méconnaissance n’entache pas celle-ci d’illégalité mais peut seulement ouvrir droit à réparation au profit du fonctionnaire concerné lorsqu’elle présente un caractère fautif et qu’il en est résulté un préjudice concret pour celui-ci, qu’il lui appartient d’établir (voir les jugements 4584, au considérant 4, 4408, aux considérants 5 et 6, ou 2885, au considérant 14).
  [L]e délai dans lequel intervient l’avis d’un tel organe est, en soi, sans incidence sur la légalité de la décision prise au vu de celui-ci (voir, par exemple, le jugement 4662, au considérant 12).

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 2885, 4408, 4584, 4662
  

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; injury; internal appeal; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4916

  
  139th Session, 2025
  Energy Charter Conference
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant contests her Performance Appraisal Report for the period from 1 November 2019 to 31 October 2020 and the decision not to renew her appointment due to unsatisfactory performance and loss of trust.

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  The complainant […] seeks the annulment of her 29 October 2020 [Performance Appraisal Report – PAR], covering the period from 1 November 2019 to 31 October 2020, and the re-opening of the performance appraisal procedure for that period to correct the substantive and procedural errors committed in her PAR. However, given the time that has elapsed since the complainant’s separation from the organisation, the Tribunal finds no useful purpose to order the re-opening of the performance appraisal procedure for the aforementioned period.
  As the complainant has established that her 29 October 2020 PAR and the resulting decision not to renew her appointment were tainted by an error of law, […] the complainant’s 29 October 2020 PAR must be annulled.

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; mistake of law; non-renewal of contract; performance; performance evaluation; performance report;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4816

  
  138th Session, 2024
  South Centre
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant contests the calculation of the compensation for the short notice, due by the South Centre, after the non-renewal of his short-term appointment as well as the calculation of his last salary.

  Considerations 7-8

  Extract:

  The foregoing considerations lead the Tribunal not only to dismiss the organization’s objections to receivability and to find that the impugned decision was unlawful, but also to note that the complainant has been unduly deprived of the benefit of an internal procedure for which provision is made in the Staff Regulations of the South Centre. It should be noted that, as the Tribunal’s case law has long emphasised, the right to an internal appeal is a safeguard which international civil servants enjoy in addition to their right of appeal to a judicial authority. Consequently, save in cases where the staff member concerned forgoes the lodging of an internal appeal, an official should not in principle be denied the possibility of having the decision which she or he challenges effectively reviewed by the competent appeal body. The Tribunal recalls its statement, in consideration 4 of Judgment 4027, that an internal appeal body’s consideration of an appeal is vitally important and, in particular, enables the official to decide whether or not to bring further proceedings, notably before the Tribunal.
  In the foregoing premises, the case will be remitted to the South Centre for the complainant’s internal appeal to be considered in compliance with Staff Regulation 11.2 and procedures set out in Annex VII cited in consideration 5 of this judgment, unless the case is settled in the meantime.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 4027
  

  Keywords:

  case sent back to organisation; decision quashed; internal appeal; internal appeals body; right of appeal;
  

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  administrative decision; case sent back to organisation; compensation; competence; complaint allowed; decision quashed; internal appeal; internal appeals body; payslip; receivability of the complaint; right of appeal; safeguard;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4504

  
  134th Session, 2022
  World Intellectual Property Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to demote her from grade P4 to grade P3 for a period of two years.

  Consideration 17

  Extract:

  [T]he impugned decision will be set aside to the extent that it found that demotion from grade P4, step PP1 to grade P3, step PP2 for a period of two years was a proportionate disciplinary measure. The matter will be remitted to WIPO for reconsideration of whether, in all the circumstances, any lesser disciplinary sanction should be imposed and, if so, what.
  As a result of setting aside the impugned decision to the extent determined in this consideration, WIPO will be ordered to reimburse the complainant, as material damages, all salaries and allowances which she would have been paid if the disciplinary sanction of demotion was not imposed upon her.

  Keywords:

  decision quashed; disciplinary measure; material damages;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4501

  
  134th Session, 2022
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision not to extend her fixed-term appointment beyond its expiry date while she was on sick leave.

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  [A] decision that is set aside by the Tribunal is deemed never to have been taken, owing to the retrospective effect of that setting aside (see, for example, Judgment 1306, consideration 6). As the Tribunal has stated, for this reason, “any subsequent or consequential decision based entirely on a decision that has been set aside necessarily lacks legal foundation and is a nullity” (see Judgment 3107, consideration 3).

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 1306, 3107
  

  Keywords:

  decision quashed;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4434

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainants challenge the refusal to organise a strike ballot under the new rules governing the exercise of the right to strike at the European Patent Office.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; right to strike; strike;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4433

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to treat his participation in a strike as an unauthorised absence.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; deduction; right to strike; salary; strike; unauthorised absence;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4431

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges a decision of the Administrative Council introducing new rules for employees of the European Patent Office concerning the right to strike.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  case sent back to organisation; complaint allowed; decision quashed; general decision; internal appeal; right to strike; strike;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4430

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainants challenge the new rules governing the exercise of the right to strike at the European Patent Office.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; general decision; right to strike; strike;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4429

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainants challenge a statement of the President of the European Patent Office alleging defamation.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  case sent back to organisation; complaint allowed; decision quashed;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4428

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the refusal of her request to combine a half day of absence for strike participation with a half day of leave.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; deduction; right to strike; salary; strike;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4427

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to maintain his transfer to a patent examiner post.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; transfer;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4425

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant impugns the decision to reject her request for reimbursement of the cost of her spa cure as a type A cure undergone for “absolute medical necessity”.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; insurance; medical expenses;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4424

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the outcome of his appeals concerning absences and reduced working hours for medical reasons.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; medical grounds; unauthorised absence;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4423

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to consider as irreceivable his request to be entitled to 12 additional days of annual leave pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the Service Regulations.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  annual leave; complaint allowed; decision quashed; unequal treatment;
  

  Consideration 13

  Extract:

  As the IAC majority opinion was fundamentally flawed, the Vice-President of DG4’s endorsement of that opinion tainted the impugned decision and, accordingly, it will be set aside. As in their respective pleadings in the present complaint, the complainant and the EPO addressed the merits of the internal appeal, the matter will not be remitted to the EPO.

  Keywords:

  decision quashed;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4415

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant contests the decision to impose upon him the disciplinary measure of dismissal for misconduct.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; disciplinary measure; health reasons; medical grounds; misconduct; termination of employment; termination of employment for health reasons;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4412

  
  132nd Session, 2021
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decisions not to renew her short-term appointment beyond 31 March 2016 and not to select her for a G-3 position advertised through a vacancy announcement.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; decision quashed; non-renewal of contract; selection procedure; short-term;
  

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 | next >