ILO is a specialised agency of the United Nations
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Oral proceedings (166, 167, 633, 795, 796, 707, 797, 798, 799,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Oral proceedings
Total judgments found: 210

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | next >

  • Judgment 4954


    139th Session, 2025
    International Atomic Energy Agency
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to close his harassment complaint and not to provide him with a copy of the investigation report.

    Consideration 12

    Extract:

    T]he complainant’s request for oral proceedings […] is also rejected, as the Tribunal finds that the parties have presented sufficiently extensive and detailed submissions and documents to allow it to be properly informed of their arguments and the relevant evidence.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4937


    139th Session, 2025
    International Organization for Migration
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decisions to abolish the post she encumbered and to terminate her contract.

    Consideration 6

    Extract:

    As a precursor to considering these grounds, the Tribunal will consider a procedural issue the complainant raises. In the complaint form, she highlights the box which signifies that she did not want oral proceedings (hearing) under Article 12(1) of the Tribunal’s Rules. However, in her rejoinder, the complainant asks the Tribunal to conduct an oral hearing and hear two witnesses. The Tribunal considers that the parties have presented sufficiently extensive and detailed submissions and documents to permit it to make an informed decision on this case. The application for oral proceedings is therefore rejected.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4916


    139th Session, 2025
    Energy Charter Conference
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant contests her Performance Appraisal Report for the period from 1 November 2019 to 31 October 2020 and the decision not to renew her appointment due to unsatisfactory performance and loss of trust.

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    The complainant appears to request oral proceedings, as she lists Mr K., the former Head of the Investment Unit, as a witness. This request is rejected, as the Tribunal considers the written submissions and the evidence produced by the parties to be sufficiently clear and detailed to enable it to render an informed decision.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4915


    139th Session, 2025
    International Bureau of Weights and Measures
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant contests the BIPM’s decision to close his harassment complaint and to reject his requests for compensation.

    Consideration 1

    Extract:

    The complainant applies for oral proceedings. The Tribunal observes that the parties have presented ample written submissions and documents to permit the Tribunal to reach an informed and just decision on the case. Thus, the request is rejected.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4914


    139th Session, 2025
    Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant contests the decision to close the investigation concluding that certain allegations against him were substantiated and to postpone the initiation of disciplinary proceedings until such time as he might be in a position to participate in such proceedings.

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    The complainant has requested oral proceedings. However, as the submissions and documents produced by the parties are sufficient to enable the Tribunal to resolve the issues raised in this complaint, the request is rejected.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4895


    138th Session, 2024
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the date of his promotion with retroactive effect and seeks promotion from an earlier date.

    Consideration 11

    Extract:

    [T]he Tribunal notes first of all that, in the absence of an express provision to the contrary, all that the right to a hearing requires is that the complainant should be free to put his case, either in writing or orally; the appeal body is not obliged to offer him both possibilities (see, in particular, Judgments 4743, consideration 13, 3447, consideration 8, and 3023, consideration 11). It is plain from the written submissions in this regard that the complainant had ample opportunity to present his allegations and arguments in writing and that he was informed, by letter of 19 November 2019, that the chairperson of the chamber to which the internal appeal had been referred had decided not to hold a hearing, since the matter could be properly addressed on the basis of the documentation already filed by the complainant with the Committee.
    In this case, the right to be heard orally by the Appeals Committee was indeed applicable at the time when the complainant filed his internal appeal on 23 May 2014. However, following the amendments introduced to the Implementing Rule for Articles 106 to 113 of the Service Regulations by Administrative Council decision CA/D 7/17 of 29 June 2017, which entered into force on 1 July 2017, Article 8(1) of the Service Regulations replaced the right to be heard orally with an option for the chairperson or presiding member of the chamber dealing with the appeal to hold a hearing if she or he considers it useful. According to the Tribunal’s case law, any amendment to the procedural rules applicable before an internal appeals body applies directly to cases pending before that body, unless a transitional provision provides otherwise (see, in particular, Judgment 3895, consideration 4). This not being the case in this instance, the chairperson of the chamber concerned, when he ruled on this point on 19 November 2019, correctly applied Article 8 of the aforementioned Service Regulations, in their new version then in force.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3023, 3447, 3895, 4743

    Keywords:

    applicable law; internal appeal; internal appeals body; oral proceedings; right to be heard;

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    applicable law; competence of tribunal; complaint dismissed; discretion; internal appeal; internal appeals body; judicial review; oral proceedings; order; promotion; retroactivity; right to be heard; work appraisal;



  • Judgment 4855


    138th Session, 2024
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the appointment of another official to the position of Deputy Director, Investment Centre Division, following a competition.

    Consideration 16

    Extract:

    The complainant sought oral proceedings, but the Tribunal is satisfied it is in a position to make a fair and balanced decision having regard to the written material provided by the parties.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4854


    138th Session, 2024
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the appointment of another official to the position of Director, Office of Strategy, Planning and Resources Management, following a competitive selection process.

    Consideration 20

    Extract:

    The complainant sought oral proceedings, but the Tribunal is satisfied it is in a position to make a fair and balanced decision having regard to the written material provided by the parties.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4853


    138th Session, 2024
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the direct appointment, ad interim, of Mr F. to the position of Director, Agricultural Development Economics Division.

    Consideration 13

    Extract:

    The complainant sought oral proceedings, but the Tribunal is satisfied it is in a position to make a fair and balanced decision having regard to the written material provided by the parties.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4852


    138th Session, 2024
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the appointment, by lateral transfer, of another official to the position of Director, FAO Liaison Office in Geneva.

    Consideration 18

    Extract:

    The complainant sought oral proceedings, but the Tribunal is satisfied it is in a position to make a fair and balanced decision having regard to the written material provided by the parties.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4837


    138th Session, 2024
    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant, who separated from service, contests the placement in his personnel file of a letter stating that he was found to have committed sexual harassment during his employment and that, had he not separated from service, he would have been imposed the disciplinary measure of a final letter of warning.

    Considerations 18-21

    Extract:

    [T]he complainant submits, in substance, that the Appeals Commission prevented him from attending the hearing of the witnesses it called to permit him to test the evidence, and, in any event, that he was not even provided with the statements of such witnesses […] The Federation relies on Judgment 4408, where the Tribunal concluded, in consideration 4, that an interview conducted as an “investigative measure” to enable an appeal body to obtain general information not relating specifically to the situation of the complainant was not a hearing where the complainant was required to be present or where the content of the discussion had to be disclosed to him or her […] It is obvious from the content of the Appeals Commission report that the information sought by the Commission was not of a general nature and that it was relating specifically to the investigation and disciplinary procedure at issue. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the complainant had a right, at least to have been apprised of the content of the interviews and to provide his comments if he so wished. Since this was not done, the complainant’s right to be heard was violated […] For this, which is an infringement of due process, he will be awarded 15,000 Swiss francs.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 4408

    Keywords:

    due process; internal appeal; internal appeals body; internal procedure; moral damages; oral proceedings; right to be heard; witness;



  • Judgment 4836


    138th Session, 2024
    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges his non-selection for several positions.

    Considerations 13-17

    Extract:

    [T]he complainant submits, in substance, that the Appeals Commission prevented him from attending the hearing of the witnesses it called to permit him to test the evidence, and, in any event, that he was not even provided with the statements of such witnesses […] The Federation relies on Judgment 4408, where the Tribunal concluded, in consideration 4, that an interview conducted as an “investigative measure” to enable an appeal body to obtain general information not relating specifically to the situation of the complainant was not a hearing where the complainant was required to be present or where the content of the discussion had to be disclosed to him or her […] It is obvious from the content of the Appeals Commission report that the information sought by the Commission was not of a general nature and that it was relating specifically to the selection procedures at issue. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the complainant had a right, at least to have been apprised of the content of the interviews and to provide his comments if he so wished. Since this was not done, the complainant’s right to be heard was violated […] For this, which is an infringement of due process, he will be awarded 15,000 Swiss francs.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 4408

    Keywords:

    due process; internal appeal; internal appeals body; internal procedure; moral damages; oral proceedings; right to be heard; witness;



  • Judgment 4835


    138th Session, 2024
    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to rescind an offer of employment that had been extended to him, on the basis that he had been disciplined for sexual misconduct.

    Considerations 4-6

    Extract:

    [T]he complainant submits, in substance, that the Appeals Commission prevented him from attending the hearing of the witnesses it called to permit him to test the evidence, and, in any event, that he was not even provided with the statements of such witnesses […] The Federation relies on Judgment 4408, where the Tribunal concluded, in consideration 4, that an interview conducted as an “investigative measure” to enable an appeal body to obtain general information not relating specifically to the situation of the complainant was not a hearing where the complainant was required to be present or where the content of the discussion had to be disclosed to him or her […] It is obvious […] that the Commission interviewed these Federation staff on various issues which touched and concerned “the circumstances in which the offer was rescinded”. This tends to demonstrate that the information sought by the Commission was not of a general nature, and that it was relating specifically to the rescission of the offer of employment at issue. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the complainant had a right, at least to have been apprised of the content of the interviews and to provide his comments if he so wished. Since this was not done, the complainant’s right to be heard was violated […] For this, which is an infringement of due process, he will be awarded 15,000 Swiss francs.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 4408

    Keywords:

    due process; internal appeal; internal appeals body; internal procedure; moral damages; oral proceedings; right to be heard; witness;



  • Judgment 4834


    138th Session, 2024
    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the non-extension of his fixed-term appointment.

    Considerations 12-15

    Extract:

    [T]he complainant submits, in substance, that the Appeals Commission prevented him from attending the hearing of the witnesses it called to permit him to test the evidence, and, in any event, that he was not even provided with the statements of such witnesses […] The Federation relies on Judgment 4408, where the Tribunal concluded, in consideration 4, that an interview conducted as an “investigative measure” to enable an appeal body to obtain general information not relating specifically to the situation of the complainant was not a hearing where the complainant was required to be present or where the content of the discussion had to be disclosed to him or her […] While the Appeals Commission’s report is almost silent about the content of those interviews, its statement that “[…]” tends to demonstrate that the interviews were not about the Federation’s budgetary framework but about the specific situation of the complainant and the decision not to extend his contract. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the complainant had a right, at least to have been apprised of the content of the interviews and to provide his comments if he so wished. Since this was not done, the complainant’s right to be heard was violated […] For this, which is an infringement of due process, he will be awarded 15,000 Swiss francs.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 4408

    Keywords:

    due process; internal appeal; internal appeals body; internal procedure; moral damages; oral proceedings; right to be heard; witness;



  • Judgment 4804


    137th Session, 2024
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant impugns the decision to reject his appeal seeking, in the main, moral damages for breach of confidentiality and defamation.

    Consideration 1

    Extract:

    The complainant applies for oral proceedings. He does not list witnesses. The parties have presented ample written submissions and documents to permit the Tribunal to reach an informed and just decision on the case. The request for oral proceedings is, therefore, rejected.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4795


    137th Session, 2024
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges his performance evaluation report for 2018.

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    The complainant has requested oral proceedings. However, in view of the ample and sufficiently clear written submissions and evidence produced by the parties, the Tribunal considers that it is fully informed about the case and will not, therefore, grant this request.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4763


    137th Session, 2024
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to reject her claim that her illnesses be recognized as service-incurred.

    Consideration 1

    Extract:

    The complainant has applied for oral proceedings under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Tribunal’s Rules by ticking this option in the complaint form. The Tribunal observes that the parties have presented ample written submissions and documents to permit the Tribunal to reach an informed and just decision on the case. Thus, the request for oral proceedings is rejected.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4743


    137th Session, 2024
    European Molecular Biology Laboratory
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to close a complaint of harassment he had filed and two related matters.

    Consideration 13

    Extract:

    According to the Tribunal’s case law, the general principles applicable to an appeal body do not require that a complainant be given an opportunity to present oral submissions in person or through a representative. All that the right to a hearing requires is that the complainant should be free to put his case, either in writing or orally; the appeal body is not obliged to offer him both possibilities (see, for example, Judgment 3447, consideration 8).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3447

    Keywords:

    internal appeals body; oral proceedings; right to be heard;



  • Judgment 4727


    136th Session, 2023
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant asserts that the EPO failed to assist him in his attempts to obtain corrected identity cards for his children.

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    The complainant requested oral proceedings. However, in view of the abundant and sufficiently clear submissions and evidence produced by the parties, the Tribunal considers that it is fully informed about the case and does not therefore deem it necessary to grant this request.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;



  • Judgment 4716


    136th Session, 2023
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges his staff report for 2014.

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    The complainant’s request for oral proceedings is rejected as the Tribunal considers that the parties have presented sufficiently extensive and detailed submissions and documents to allow it to be properly informed of their arguments and of the relevant evidence. In any event, the contentions which the complainant raises turn essentially on questions of law, which render oral proceedings unnecessary.

    Keywords:

    oral proceedings;

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | next >


 
Last updated: 24.04.2025 ^ top