Supervision (879,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Supervision
Total judgments found: 4

• Judgment 4962

  
  139th Session, 2025
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges her performance appraisal for 2019 and the subsequent decisions to “freeze” her step advancement and to place her on a performance improvement plan.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; performance evaluation; rating; step; supervision; supervisor;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4961

  
  139th Session, 2025
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to reject her complaint of moral harassment, as well as what she regards as a decision to cancel her performance appraisal for 2019 and the decision to reinstate her former line manager and to make him responsible for conducting her annual appraisal for 2019.

  Consideration 19

  Extract:

  Le Tribunal considère […] qu’il est […] parfaitement concevable, en vue d’assurer un fonctionnement continu et correct de toute organisation internationale, de rétablir la chaîne hiérarchique normale lorsque la plainte pour harcèlement déposée par un fonctionnaire envers l’un ou l’autre de ses supérieurs a été rejetée en interne, ce qui a été le cas en l’espèce.

  Keywords:

  harassment; supervision; supervisor;
  

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint allowed; harassment; performance evaluation; rating; supervision; supervisor;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4881

  
  138th Session, 2024
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges his change of immediate supervisor.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint dismissed; supervision; supervisor;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4241

  
  129th Session, 2020
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complaint challenges the decision to dismiss her complaint of harassment as unsubstantiated.

  Considerations 21-22

  Extract:

  In the Tribunal’s view, the humiliating circumstances were exacerbated on the evidence, which the IOS correctly accepted, that the DXD/MER did not invite the complainant for whom she was the first-level supervisor to regular one-on-one meetings. This was an essential supervisory duty. The IOS found that the DXD/MER could not have reasonably known that neglecting to invite the complainant to such meetings regularly would offend, humiliate or intimidate her and that her harassment complaint did not state that the DXD/MER “persistently refused to meet with her” on that basis. According to the IOS, it was open to the complainant to request such meetings if she believed that they were warranted, and it noted that the complainant was also said to be reluctant to meet with the DXD/MER. It therefore concluded that there was no evidence to support the allegation that the latter’s conduct constituted harassment in this respect. This finding was mistaken.
  Regular one-on-one meetings with the complainant as a Department Director to discuss technical and administrative matters, was an essential management requirement for the DXD/MER as her first-level supervisor. It was not dependent upon a request and justification by the complainant.

  Keywords:

  harassment; supervision;