Third party (960,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Third party
Total judgments found: 6

• Judgment 5152

  
  141st Session, 2026
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant seeks a review of the measures taken following the Organization’s acknowledgment of the violation of its duty of care towards him and asks that it be ordered to publish a press release to clear his reputation and to pay him additional amounts in moral damages and legal “fees”.

  Consideration 12

  Extract:

  [T]he claims aimed at third parties, in the present case the request that media be ordered to remove articles or to publish retractions, go well beyond the Tribunal’s competence.

  Keywords:

  competence of tribunal; injunction; third party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5045

  
  140th Session, 2025
  International Atomic Energy Agency
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the communication, addressed by the IAEA to all of its staff members of British nationality, informing them that officials holding a residence permit under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union would be considered as having obtained permanent residence status in the country of their duty station (Austria), which would affect their home leave and repatriation grant entitlements as well as the privileges and immunities granted to them.

  Consideration 19

  Extract:

  [The complainant] seeks an order that benefits for all staff be reinstated and that damages be granted to them. It is not open to him to seek relief beyond enforcing his rights.

  Keywords:

  claim; third party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5044

  
  140th Session, 2025
  International Atomic Energy Agency
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the communication, addressed by the IAEA to all of its staff members of British nationality, informing them that officials holding a residence permit under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union would be considered as having obtained permanent residence status in the country of their duty station (Austria), which would affect their home leave and repatriation grant entitlements as well as the privileges and immunities granted to them.

  Consideration 16

  Extract:

  [The complainant] seeks an order that benefits for all staff be reinstated and, in a subsequent claim, that all current and former staff members be provided 'full recompense'. It is not open to him to seek relief beyond enforcing his rights.

  Keywords:

  claim; third party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 5043

  
  140th Session, 2025
  International Atomic Energy Agency
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the communication, addressed by the IAEA to all of its staff members of British nationality, informing them that officials holding a residence permit under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union would be considered as having obtained permanent residence status in the country of their duty station (Austria), which would affect their home leave and repatriation grant entitlements as well as the privileges and immunities granted to them.

  Consideration 20

  Extract:

  The complainant seeks an order reinstating all benefits and entitlements which have been withheld, delayed or otherwise diminished to all staff, whether or not they have appealed. However, it is not open to him to seek relief beyond enforcing his rights. This claim is rejected.

  Keywords:

  claim; third party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4987

  
  139th Session, 2025
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant contests the decision to close the area of competence G01R in Berlin.

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  In any event, the complainant has no cause of action with regard to an individual decision affecting a third party.

  Keywords:

  cause of action; third party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4575

  
  135th Session, 2023
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complaints concern compensation following the refusal to allow the Central Staff Committee to publish two documents on the EPO’s Intranet.

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  As to the receivability of the complainants’ request for an award of moral damages in the amount of one euro per staff member, the Tribunal notes that its jurisdiction ratione personae, pursuant to Article II of the Statute, is of an individual nature. The Tribunal can only order that the Organisation pay compensation for damages to the complainants (Article II, paragraph 5, of the Statute of the Tribunal), and not to third parties. For this reason, the Tribunal will not follow Judgment 2857, which underpins the complainants’ argument on this topic.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 2857
  

  Keywords:

  cause of action; moral damages; receivability of the complaint; staff representative; third party;